Join 48,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!
Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.
y? What's the diet made mainly of? I'd guess raw meat no? What makes it more expensive than others diet
?
Muscle meat is cheapest part of diet, and easily sourcable.
@osteochondromyxoma jfl fuck this expensive ahh diet, at least (according to aajonus's hypotheses) you lower your chance of balding, slightly lighten eye color, improve muscular and bone density, improve hair quality and skin, and live past 100
Bro idk I never could really follow primal tbh, I always ate some candy with raw organs lol, also why would you want to live past 100, 70's a good age considering ur dick "stops" working around that age
It'd be better to just not stress and eat kinda clean
Its cope to an extent, just get muh micronutrient
TAILS made a vid on it and i think it sums it up pretty much, you dont really need raw meat as a normal person
while he wasnt fuelled by money he was def fuelled by ego, joever
Unironically sounds like fairy tales
Even the Queen Elizabeth didn't eat this good, wtf did I just read
had to google his name, seems an interesting man
Yeah, the only failure of this diet is pure lack of evidence and Aajonus's own egotistical drive
Yeah, insane diet and sourcing. Optimal, but negligible improvements. You won't become chad from this even after many generations
Did he live till 100?
Died at 67 due to trauma (falling through deck in thailand) he claimed many of his patients lived above it
He refused surgery and drugs at the hospital bro. There are also conspiracies that he was murdered, I need a good source to confirm this
Those are cope, no one was out to get him
He really shouldn’t refuse the medical assistance, he could have lived, was he anti-vax/meds too?
ye, claimed vaccines are toxic
cuck
unironically diet of kings
True , other shi way more toxic. Claims that they dont work either and that microbes dont carry disease
A really good animal based diet + soft maxxing is law. Ascended me tbh.
@HDm7CoQ prob thinks its cope, but easy way to obtain nutrient dense foods
Because the guy is very literal and denies anything without a bunch of studies behind it. I honestly believe that while you're still developing, eating a good animal based diet + soft maxxing can noticeably improve your looks. I'm not talking truecel to chad, but you can go up a point. I've seen too much personal and anecdotal evidence along with supporting studies to convince me of something. It might not be substantial, but something must come out of this. The adverse is shown to be detrimental.
Just deny biology bro, I mean if he has empirical evidence suggesting that microbes really don’t carry diseases, fair enough but otherwise it’s just retarded and broscience
Blatant denalism tbh, its like HIV is correlated with deaht but doesnt cause it, or ebola is correlated with death bht doesnt transmit or cause it
This isn't necessarily true either, if you can back up these claims with actual evidence and plausible moas (mechanisms of action), then maybe occur but you still have to be careful around the wording, that is your hypothesis and not an established theory.
It's way too excessive, you don't need these much nutrients and effort. You can eat raw meat, milk, and eggs if they are super fresh, but I am a strong believer in the germ theory and that pathogens, parasites, and bacteria are the carriers of the disease. Any longer than absolutely fresh, harmful bacteria will proliferate, this is proven.
Sounds about right, I've done my research on this guy in the past couple days, seems like half the stuff is truth and the rest he pulls out of his butt
www.healthline.com
www.health.harvard.edu
www.healthline.com
This guy does seem very egotistical from his lectures
You put a lot of efforts in ur post brah mirin, genuinely, do you consume adderal whenever you log in?This isn't necessarily true either, if you can back up these claims with actual evidence and plausible moas (mechanisms of action), then maybe occur but you still have to be careful around the wording, that is your hypothesis and not an established theory.
It's way too excessive, you don't need these much nutrients and effort. You can eat raw meat, milk, and eggs if they are super fresh, but I am a strong believer in the germ theory and that pathogens, parasites, and bacteria are the carriers of the disease. Any longer than absolutely fresh, harmful bacteria will proliferate, this is proven.
Sounds about right, I've done my research on this guy in the past couple days, seems like half the stuff is truth and the rest he pulls out of his butt
He exaggerates a lot of stuff, and lacks knowledge in a good amount of stuff, his empirical knowledge and experiences are often based on faulty links.
I'd say, the best way to preserve nutrients and get rid of harmful bacteria, if you can't get the stuff fresh, is to microwave meat, vegetables, and eggs. This will get rid of most of the harmful stuff (plant toxins, "antinutrients", bacteria) and preserve the nutrients along with the water soluble content.
Microwaving alone reduces anti nutrients (not combined with other factors to reduce them) https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10159748/?
Microwaving efficiently destroys harmful bacteria in meat:
Microwaving is the most effective way to preserve nutrients:
Microwave Ovens and Health
There is a lot of controversy surrounding microwave ovens. Some people claim that they can destroy nutrients in foods and produce harmful radiation.Ask the doctor: Microwave's impact on food - Harvard Health
Microwave cooking is one of the least likely forms of cooking to damage nutrients. That’s because nutrients tend to break down the longer they’re being cooked, and microwave cooking tak...Microwave oven - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Microwave Ovens and Health
There is a lot of controversy surrounding microwave ovens. Some people claim that they can destroy nutrients in foods and produce harmful radiation.
My hypothesis on the Pottenger's Cat study I've seen you post about is that a large amount of their issues were due to dehydration, which leads to lack of cellular health and optimal performance in the long run. The cooked meat has way less water content in it, so even if the nutrients are similar you are going to be dehydrated. These poor cats were not properly hydrated, and consumed the greens to compensate (Plant matter is around 90-95% water).
And again, more nutrients doesn't mean better whether that's supplements, foods, or whatever. Meet the requirements, and you will have good health. Not really an ideal diet, but just different ways to be healthy.
while i like you, i think u should be spending this time doing more productive things