Looksmaxxing Forum Logo

Join 58,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

Register Log in
  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

All Dalit are Aryan

Register to hide this ad
Everyone has Aryan DNA to some point. How much Aryan you have don't matter as long as you have high AASI DNA.

Aryan DNA cannot be more than 35% in any individual. Many Dalits have 20% Aryan yet they look subhuman.

Also Pakistanis are similar to North West India. The Jats of Pakistan and Northwest India look so shit yet they have high Aryan (35%) as well as moderate AASI (40%).
 
THE_JEET said:
Pashutans mog all of us , they are facially superior..Indians with rich genetic history can mog too if fed a good protein rich diet
Click to expand...
Pashtuns are Afghans. Most of the Pakistan is dominated by Punjabis which are same like Indian Punjabis.
 
Exeggutor said:
Everyone has Aryan DNA to some point. How much Aryan you have don't matter as long as you have high AASI DNA.

Aryan DNA cannot be more than 35% in any individual. Many Dalits have 20% Aryan yet they look subhuman.

Also Pakistanis are similar to North West India. The Jats of Pakistan and Northwest India look so shit yet they have high Aryan (35%) as well as moderate AASI (40%).
Click to expand...
abos have aryan dna too?
 
IMPORTANT: said:
abos have aryan dna too?
Click to expand...
Nope they don't if they are Australian.

Indians Pakistanis comprise of lots of genetics like BMAC, Iranian farmer, steppe, AASI. They have more or less of that. Even some whites have 10% n****r genes
 
Why did I fucking tag this guy
 
THE_JEET said:
Pashutans mog all of us , they are facially superior..Indians with rich genetic history can mog too if fed a good protein rich diet
Click to expand...
They’re the most high T. They were the only ones to keep fighting the British despite the British Raj being a thing. The British could never subjugate them.
 
Biharis are as aryan as a human being can be
 
Gengar said:
Yeah you fucked up now this is gonna be a discussion about South Asians and surrounding peoples
Click to expand...
pakistan 🇵🇰, India 🇮🇳, Afghanistan 🇦🇫, Bangladesh 🇧🇩, Nepal 🇳🇵, Sri Lanka 🇱🇰

All these people are invited here. Rest of you get out of this discussion
 
Gengar said:
They’re the most high T. They were the only ones to keep fighting the British despite the British Raj being a thing. The British could never subjugate them.
Click to expand...
True , they got their dopamine boost from the bomb blasts happening around them
 
Exeggutor said:
pakistan 🇵🇰, India 🇮🇳, Afghanistan 🇦🇫, Bangladesh 🇧🇩, Nepal 🇳🇵, Sri Lanka 🇱🇰

All these people are invited here. Rest of you get out of this discussion
Click to expand...
Afghans aren’t South Asians. They are southern Central Asians.
 
THE_JEET said:
True , they got their dopamine boost from the bomb blasts happening around them
Click to expand...
This was happening way before that. They were also fighting against Alexander the Great’s army but of course they lost.
 
Gengar said:
They’re the most high T. They were the only ones to keep fighting the British despite the British Raj being a thing. The British could never subjugate them.
Click to expand...
They were defeated by Sikhs. The same Sikhs couldn't defeat British which were defeated by Pashtuns.

War isn't so black and white. Empires have their own pros and cons. What works against Sikhs couldn't work against Afghans. What works against Afghans doesn't work against British. What works against British doesn't works against Sikhs.
 
Gengar said:
Afghans aren’t South Asians. They are southern Central Asians.
Click to expand...
Afghans associate themselves with us. Lots of ancient Indian empires had their kingdoms till Afghanistan.

Geography wise they are not South Asian but culture and history wise they are.
 
Exeggutor said:
They were defeated by Sikhs. The same Sikhs couldn't defeat British which were defeated by Pashtuns.

War isn't so black and white. Empires have their own pros and cons. What works against Sikhs couldn't work against Afghans. What works against Afghans doesn't work against British. What works against British doesn't works against Sikhs.
Click to expand...
Afghans first invaded and occupied Punjab for 150 years or so before Punjabis started amassing their own army.
 
Exeggutor said:
Afghans associate themselves with us. Lots of ancient Indian empires had their kingdoms till Afghanistan.

Geography wise they are not South Asian but culture and history wise they are.
Click to expand...
Afghans do not associate themselves with South Asians. They make it clear they have a distinct lineage, a distinct culture, a distinct language, and these things are all true. Nor culturally nor historically are they South Asians. South Asians were Hindus or Buddhists whereas Afghans were Zoroastrians though some were Buddhists.
 
Gengar said:
Afghans do not associate themselves with South Asians. They make it clear they have a distinct lineage, a distinct culture, a distinct language, and these things are all true. Nor culturally nor historically are they South Asians. South Asians were Hindus or Buddhists whereas Afghans were Zoroastrians though some were Buddhists.
Click to expand...
You Afghan?
 
Phantom said:
Pakistan mogs India ngl but both are shitholes
Click to expand...
Your statement is shallow , most Indians today aren't really indians but a inferior mix of tribal people with Indians with rich genetic history..Also I don't believe calling any country a shithole , it's just the timeline..there was a timeline when Europeans were in cave while people living in South Asia specifically indian region were researching about space....Countries change with timeline and it will definitely change
 
@rovea delete this fucking thread
 
THE_JEET said:
Your statement is shallow , most Indians today aren't really indians but a inferior mix of tribal people with Indians with rich genetic history..Also I don't believe calling any country a shithole , it's just the timeline..there was a timeline when Europeans were in cave while people living in South Asia specifically indian region were researching about space....Countries change with timeline and it will definitely change
Click to expand...
First Indians were proto-negroids who came to India around 50,000 BC.

Rest of the Iranian farmers, Steppe, Khmer rice farmers, BMAC, Anatolian farmer, came on later.
 
THE_JEET said:
Your statement is shallow , most Indians today aren't really indians but a inferior mix of tribal people with Indians with rich genetic history..Also I don't believe calling any country a shithole , it's just the timeline..there was a timeline when Europeans were in cave while people living in South Asia specifically indian region were researching about space....Countries change with timeline and it will definitely change
Click to expand...
Dnr dalit
 
Exeggutor said:
You Afghan?
Click to expand...
No, I’m not Afghan. I’m Pakistani, but I have seen the way Afghans talk down on South Asians. They have every right to, since South Asians are always trying to claim them. Genetically, we are distinct from them. They have BMAC ancestry that we lack (except for some Punjabis, like Arains and Kamboh; both were of former Proto-Indo-Iranian stock but became Indicized).
 
Exeggutor said:
First Indians were proto-negroids who came to India around 50,000 BC.

Rest of the Iranian farmers, Steppe, Khmer rice farmers, BMAC, Anatolian farmer, came on later.
Click to expand...
Yeah, South Asia was first populated by the OoA (out of Africa) wave about 60,000 years ago. However, going that far back is pointless. We should focus by going back to the Bronze Age / Iron Age era. That’s where our distinct differences begin.
 
Exeggutor said:
First Indians were proto-negroids who came to India around 50,000 BC.

Rest of the Iranian farmers, Steppe, Khmer rice farmers, BMAC, Anatolian farmer, came on later.
Click to expand...
Skin color differences and facial differences occurred only 10-20 thousand years ago , before that ,all humans were genetically same so your statement is useless
 
over0 said:
Muhhh I'm 3.27 shades lighter than you I mog
Click to expand...
Screenshot_2025-11-28-15-06-23-23_1c337646f29875672b5a61192b9010f9.jpg
 
over0 said:
Muhhh I'm 3.27 shades lighter than you I mog
Click to expand...
Dalits can have light skin too.

Inheritance of a skin color is like a dice. I am light brown (on pale side) while my mum and sibling are dark. My dad is pale.
 
THE_JEET said:
View attachment 224313
Click to expand...
Europeans inherited pale skin from Vitamin D deficient Anatolian farmers. They had dark skin with blue eyes and blonde hair initially. Aryans had no impact on their looks. No human has over 40% Aryan.

Were denisovans pale?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (Looksmaxxers: 0, Guests: 1)
Back
Top