Discussion An argument for the existence of God

[Ivy]

P1 If Information Structural Reality Model of Meta Ontology is true, then that with first order properties necessarily exist

P2 Informational structural realist Model of Meta ontology is true

C1 That with first order properties necessarily exist

P3 For anything with first order properties, it exists either as just a mere concept or as something more than just a mere concept (it has an extramental instantiation, which is to say it is mind independent)

P4 God has first order properties

C2 God exists either as a mere concept or as something more than just a mere concept, ie, something mind independent.

P5 God either exists as a mere concept or something more than just a mere concept, ie, as a mind independent object (follows from C2)

P6 It is logically impossible and thus necessarily false that God exists as a mere concept

C3 God exists in a way that isn't just a mere concept, and thus as a mind independent object, ergo, God exists objectively..

 

[𐲀 𐲢 𐲠 𐲀 𐲇 𐲰]

n*****s see one edit of thomas aquinas and start acting like they are into theology

 

[Xx_Sh4tteredHe4rt_xX]

P1 If Information Structural Reality Model of Meta Ontology is true, then that with first order properties necessarily exist

P2 Informational structural realist Model of Meta ontology is true

C1 That with first order properties necessarily exist

P3 For anything with first order properties, it exists either as just a mere concept or as something more than just a mere concept (it has an extramental instantiation, which is to say it is mind independent)

P4 God has first order properties

C2 God exists either as a mere concept or as something more than just a mere concept, ie, something mind independent.

P5 God either exists as a mere concept or something more than just a mere concept, ie, as a mind independent object (follows from C2)

P6 It is logically impossible and thus necessarily false that God exists as a mere concept

C3 God exists in a way that isn't just a mere concept, and thus as a mind independent object, ergo, God exists objectively..

@grok summirize this

 

[Ivy]

n*****s see one edit of thomas aquinas and start acting like they are into theology

I don't like Thomas Aquinas , also Thomas Aquinas literally says the Father is identical to the Son in a way that's bullshit , also I'm not Christian I'm agnostic

 

[submissivechud]

P1 If Information Structural Reality Model of Meta Ontology is true, then that with first order properties necessarily exist

P2 Informational structural realist Model of Meta ontology is true

C1 That with first order properties necessarily exist

P3 For anything with first order properties, it exists either as just a mere concept or as something more than just a mere concept (it has an extramental instantiation, which is to say it is mind independent)

P4 God has first order properties

C2 God exists either as a mere concept or as something more than just a mere concept, ie, something mind independent.

P5 God either exists as a mere concept or something more than just a mere concept, ie, as a mind independent object (follows from C2)

P6 It is logically impossible and thus necessarily false that God exists as a mere concept

C3 God exists in a way that isn't just a mere concept, and thus as a mind independent object, ergo, God exists objectively..

god as a concept exists
i dont see how this means anything