Join 58,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Serious At What Point Are Standards Too High

Register to hide this ad
Well that means your standards are low but if the other person has a great personality and y'all are compatible it's good too
what if this isn’t for ltr like i said in post?
 
Feelings happen randomly.
Having standards in general is weird asf and in the relationship you label things with such standards (you don't label in relationships.) One day they will change and you might get tired since it's not up to date with your selfish standards.
 
a ltb thinking she can date a cl would be crazy
i dont think there is a world that would happen
i guess my question is would you smash a bigger woman if it was a one time thing?
 
Haven't blatent standards isn't worth it. You'll be looking for your Rapunzel for an eternity.
If she's attractive, she's attractive. Don't base your dating life off 7 or above.
 
Haven't blatent standards isn't worth it. You'll be looking for your Rapunzel for an eternity.
If she's attractive, she's attractive. Don't base your dating life off 7 or above.
It's also the fact people solely focus on pure looks and i know it's BP but if you are going into an LTR rapunzel might be a bitch and most would stay because they are only there for said looks.
Pretty sad shit.
 
i guess my question is would you smash a bigger woman if it was a one time thing?
im still in hs and in hs u could get ur looksmatch if ur willing to put in effort
but if im putting myself in the shoes of a bigger woman that would def inflate my ego
 
It's also the fact people solely focus on pure looks and i know it's BP but if you are going into an LTR rapunzel might be a bitch and most would stay because they are only there for said looks.
Pretty sad shit.
BP was constructed by incels who's only means of picking up chicks was dating apps.
Dating apps are, of course, very looks-biased. Real life isn't entirely like that.
Yes, looks matter (we've known for millenias), but personality is the determining factor in a successful relationship.

Autists will try to improve their looks, as it's easier than improving their mind.
 
BP was constructed by incels who's only means of picking up chicks was dating apps.
Dating apps are, of course, very looks-biased. Real life isn't entirely like that.
Yes, looks matter (we've known for millenias), but personality is the determining factor in a successful relationship.

Autists will try to improve their looks, as it's easier than improving their mind.
I kinda disagree, some people with great personalities will never get a look from those from the opposite gender because of their looks. It starts with looks but stays with personality.
 
It starts with looks but stays with personality.
Very true, my point was more-so that autists believed that improving their looks will improve their relationships entirely.
They completely disregard that women aren't engineered solely to go for looks.
 
Very true, my point was more-so that autists believed that improving their looks will improve their relationships entirely.
They completely disregard that women aren't engineered solely to go for looks.
Brutal personality pill. I agree, NDcels will think looks = dateability when they can't get out of their misogynistic perspective.
 

~—• APATHEIA •—~​


BP was constructed by incels who's only means of picking up chicks was dating apps.
Dating apps are, of course, very looks-biased. Real life isn't entirely like that.
Yes, looks matter (we've known for millenias), but personality is the determining factor in a successful relationship.

Autists will try to improve their looks, as it's easier than improving their mind.
Brutal personality pill. I agree, NDcels will think looks = dateability when they can't get out of their misogynistic perspective.

It is reflected in evolutionary psychology studies too, in speed-dating situations, it is very looks-biased, in real life scenarios, like say, college: It is much more nuanced, although it tends to be relatively assortative. That is why dating apps do not prove the blackpill in real life. Majority of people genuinely just have to "muh go outside" and garner social skills.

If you look into evolutionary psychology regarding attraction for a good minute, you start to understand that the "significant correlation" blackpillers state something has, has no better probability in real life than a simple coin flip, and exaggerated blackpill theories start being quickly shut down. Attraction is extremely multi-faceted. I know this is probably common sense to you but people in here cannot wrap their heads around the fact that there is no clear rule set on attraction, only things that will increase probabilities of attraction. (Albeit, some more than others, like extraversion) That is why no one pill is going to be correct all the time.

Despite what I said, even pro-social skills like extraversion has a much larger correlation and probability with the number of sex partners someone has had than height or looks.

I can send my sources if you would like.

1757546229094.png

1757547979629.webp

1757548068560.jpeg

https://datepsychology.com/facial-attractiveness-less-important-for-male-dateability/

That is why you can end up with things like:

1757546551559.jpeg

1757547062845.jpeg


or

1757546670936.webp
1757546680026.webp
1757546690055.webp

1757546905603.webp
1757546950368.webp
1757547092350.webp

 

Attachments

  • 1757546539041.jpeg
    1757546539041.jpeg
    70.8 KB · Views: 1
  • 1757547975428.webp
    1757547975428.webp
    17.3 KB · Views: 1

~—• APATHEIA •—~​





It is reflected in evolutionary psychology studies too, in speed-dating situations, it is very looks-biased, in real life scenarios, like say, college: It is much more nuanced, although it tends to be relatively assortative. That is why dating apps do not prove the blackpill in real life. Majority of people genuinely just have to "muh go outside" and garner social skills.

If you look into evolutionary psychology regarding attraction for a good minute, you start to understand that the "significant correlation" blackpillers state something has, has no better probability in real life than a simple coin flip, and exaggerated blackpill theories start being quickly shut down. Attraction is extremely multi-faceted. I know this is probably common sense to you but people in here cannot wrap their heads around the fact that there is no clear rule set on attraction, only things that will increase probabilities of attraction. (Albeit, some more than others, like extraversion) That is why no one pill is going to be correct all the time.

Despite what I said, even pro-social skills like extraversion has a much larger correlation and probability with the number of sex partners someone has had than height or looks.

I can send my sources if you would like.


Absolutely. Good point on how attraction is very multi-faceted and is different for each person.
Anyone who's love is soley based on appearance is filled with vain and emptiness.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top