Join 58,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

being called insentient is a complement

Jawggernaut Mewlord

Awoke doctor
Reputable
Established ★
Joined
Aug 25, 2025
Messages
4,161
Time Online
17d 12h
Reputation
9,457
I don't get why people mix up iq and sentience. Being calld low sentience is only bad if it's coupled with an insect or AI.

otherwise they're just calling you a stoic machiavellian terrachad. With the exception being perhaps they just wanna call you not feely or touchy
 
Register to hide this ad
I don't get why people mix up iq and sentience. Being calld low sentience is only bad if it's coupled with an insect or AI.

otherwise they're just calling you a stoic machiavellian terrachad. With the exception being perhaps they just wanna call you not feely or touchy
its not lol, tf are these conclusions
 
I don't get why people mix up iq and sentience. Being calld low sentience is only bad if it's coupled with an insect or AI.

otherwise they're just calling you a stoic machiavellian terrachad. With the exception being perhaps they just wanna call you not feely or touchy
Tbh “machiavellianists” shouldn’t exist. The prince is written as political theory, not a guide or something humans should strive for.
 
Pre sups in order to meet necessary conditions for his worldview? Every worldview is circular brother, what he’s saying is logical
idk bro seems shit
 
Tbh “machiavellianists” shouldn’t exist. The prince is written as political theory, not a guide or something humans should strive for.
bro knows ball
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top