Join 33,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Mog Battle Bomer vs Hexum

Is it because his measurable objective ratios are better, or its that your personal opinion?
Bomer has near perfect harmony, his dimorphism is perfectly ideal. While hexum has good harmony, its not super high and his dimorphism is extremely high leading him to be a little ogreish looking. I think while hexum is still objectively a 9+ bomer is scientifically more attractive aswell as more appealing.
 
Bomer has near perfect harmony, his dimorphism is perfectly ideal. While hexum has good harmony, its not super high and his dimorphism is extremely high leading him to be a little ogreish looking. I think while hexum is still objectively a 9+ bomer is scientifically more attractive aswell as more appealing.
Bomer looks AI generated while hexum looks ethereal. Like someone that transcends his features that is what makes hexum unmoggable.



 
They are both obviously top-tier males that any normie should aspire to look like but anyone that says Bomer mogs is retarded. He's overrated as fuck and does not at all come close to Hexum.

Bomer 8.85/10 (lower nine if he frauds his forehead)
Hexum 9.5/10
 
Bomer has near perfect harmony, his dimorphism is perfectly ideal.
Bomer's main unharmonious ratios is his eye spacing (slightly close-set, typically not bad for males since slightly close-set eyes are dominant), bi-temporal width (too large forehead), brow-ridge inclination (very flat & smooth like that of a female) and his lips are very thin and of poor proportion, also a feminine quality. His lip seal and mouth corners also look gay as fuck.

These uneven mixes of masculinized and feminized ratios on his already masculine skull, instead of adding general softness to his face, just makes him look uncanny and gay in most photos. So no his dimorphism is not 'perfectly ideal'. That's your own personal opinion.
While hexum has good harmony, its not super high and his dimorphism is extremely high leading him to be a little ogreish looking.
Hexum's main unharmonious ratios is his philtrum (a few mm too long, doesn't harmonize well with his facial third distribution), his lips are also of poor proportion (ogre-ish looking, his lip seal is also not the greatest and his vermillion borders are fucking invisible, adding further to the ogre-ish look), and his labiomental angle, 5+ degrees out of the 'ideal range'. Which is why his chin just looks off in most photos.

I would include his gonial angle since it's over on the higher side but it looks very harmonious and perfect in most photos and in motion so you'd really have to nitpick and get a protractor out to really notice anything out of the arbitrary 'ideal' range, and because I'm not a retarded nitpicker I'm not including it.

Hexum also probably has ptosis or some form of orbital asymmetry or something causing his lower eyelids to droop down, that and his lateral canthus obviously lacks height but his lower eyelids pose more of an issue since the position of the lateral canthus does not really add to anyone's 'harmony score', more the shape and quality of the orbital bones.

His visible NCT adds softness to his face, which is harmonious and looks good on him, and if you see any morph of him giving him perfect orbitals and lower eyelid symmetry + PCT he'll just look like a fucking alien and there is a reason for that.
 
For some reason Bomer's psl doubles when he's on the phone
1730747478442-jpeg.51830
1730747533259.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • 1730747478442.jpeg
    1730747478442.jpeg
    20.2 KB · Views: 16
Bomer's main unharmonious ratios is his eye spacing (slightly close-set, typically not bad for males since slightly close-set eyes are dominant),
His eye spacing is perfectly ideal, 45.6% which is proven to be scientifically perfect for males.
These uneven mixes of masculinized and feminized ratios on his already masculine skull, instead of adding general softness to his face, just makes him look uncanny and gay in most photos. So no his dimorphism is not 'perfectly ideal'. That's your own personal opinion.
His dimorphism is high... What do you mean dimorphism can be measured and his has been measured multiple times.. Wide and dominant lower third relative to his other facial thirds, high facial leanness, wide bi-temporal width, wide and tall chin, masculine browridge. So no his dimorphism is pretty perfect without being too ogre or too feminine, not my opinion its a fact.
 
His eye spacing is perfectly ideal, 45.6% which is proven to be scientifically perfect for males.

His dimorphism is high... What do you mean dimorphism can be measured and his has been measured multiple times.. Wide and dominant lower third relative to his other facial thirds, high facial leanness, wide bi-temporal width, wide and tall chin, masculine browridge. So no his dimorphism is pretty perfect without being too ogre or too feminine, not my opinion its a fact.
I just explained why his dimorphism isn't perfect. His uneven mix of masculinized and feminized ratios make him look gay. Which he does. His face isn't more harmonious or better dimorphic than Hexum's and I went into full detail of his flaws which you just outright ignored.
 
I just explained why his dimorphism isn't perfect. His uneven mix of masculinized and feminized ratios make him look gay. Which he does. His face isn't more harmonious or better dimorphic than Hexum's and I went into full detail of his flaws which you just outright ignored.
Like I said his eye spacing is perfect, his lower lip to upper lip ratio is perfect (his lips are thin which isnt a harmony factor its misc), His bizygo to bitemportal width is perfect. With his only frontal flaws being mediocre orbital bones, thin lips, and too long face shape (only harmony flaw).
His lip seal and mouth corners also look gay as fuck.
Your subjective opinion, it doesn't deduct harmony or dimorphism points.
His face isn't more harmonious or better dimorphic than Hexum's
He is more harmonious then hexum, hexums frontal score is 73% while bomers is 96%
 
Like I said his eye spacing is perfect, his lower lip to upper lip ratio is perfect (his lips are thin which isnt a harmony factor its misc), His bizygo to bitemportal width is perfect. With his only frontal flaw being mediocre orbital bones, thin lips, and too long face shape (only harmony flaw).

Your subjective opinion, it doesn't deduct harmony or dimorphism points.

He is more harmonious then hexum, hexums frontal score is 73% while bomers is 96%
Yeah you're another CreatingAttractive glazer with zero braincells. Literally saw those same numbers on his shitty youtube channel where he used the worst pics to measure. Dont reply to me
 
Yeah you're another CreatingAttractive glazer with zero braincells.
Okay, id rather use objective measurements then muh subjective opinion such as yours. Everything he uses to measure OBJECTIVE BEAUTY is backed up by scientific studies.
Literally saw those same numbers on his shitty youtube channel where he used the worst pics to measure. Dont reply to me
"Worst pictures to measure" he literally used pictures where there is perfect posture with 0 lens distortion to measure matt bomer if thats what you wanna imply.
 
Okay, id rather use objective measurements then muh subjective opinion such as yours. Everything he uses to measure OBJECTIVE BEAUTY is backed up by scientific studies.

"Worst pictures to measure" he literally used pictures where there is perfect posture with 0 lens distortion to measure matt bomer if thats what you wanna imply.
When are you opening up your own tiktok account where you rate random celebrities and use ca's false measurements and shitty calculator and get 100k followers and then sell it
 
When are you opening up your own tiktok account where you rate random celebrities and use ca's false measurements and shitty calculator and get 100k followers and then sell it
Why dont you go ahead and prove they are false measurements cunt
 
Why dont you go ahead and prove they are false measurements cunt
I've measured Hexum & Bomer plenty of times with several pictures, these 'ideal ranges' you brainlets use to measure and calculate by is arbitrary and not accurate, I listed all of their flaws and unharmonious measurements above

According to CA:

Hexum has 73% harmony
Barrett has 75% harmony
Meeks has 90% harmony (implied that it was even higher than that because of his ethnicity)
Bomer has 96% harmony

???

Makes zero sense LOL, theres a reason he deleted every video off of his page
 
I've measured Hexum & Bomer plenty of times with several pictures, these 'ideal ranges' you brainlets use to measure and calculate by is arbitrary and not accurate, I listed all of their flaws and unharmonious measurements above

According to CA:

Hexum has 73% harmony
Barrett has 75% harmony
Meeks has 90% harmony (implied that it was even higher than that because of his ethnicity)
Bomer has 96% harmony

???

Makes zero sense LOL, theres a reason he deleted every video off of his page
How does it make zero sense?
Like I said all the ideal ratios are backed up by scientific studies
The "flaws and unharmonious measurements" you listed don't even have to do with harmony and one of them was just your opinion
 
How does it make zero sense?
Like I said all the ideal ratios are backed up by scientific studies
The "flaws and unharmonious measurements" you listed don't even have to do with harmony and one of them was just your opinion
The ideal ranges for harmonious ratios are loose man-made measurements and even the word scientific is a loose term to back up these numerical value ranges that are supposed to reflect objective and true beauty.

I am looking at a beautiful face, my brain innately recognizes the face I am looking at is beautiful. The idea of numbers and measurements and angles and ratios don't even exist in this scenario, the brain simply recognizes an attractive and gorgeous face in a fraction of a second.

Now, why this face is so beautiful can be explained in scientific terms relating to the nature of what is subjectively attractive and beautiful to us on a neurobiological level.

And there are also factors that could potentially make a face more beautiful or aesthetically pleasing to look at for the human brain, like more compact orbitals, thicker eyebrows, lighter eye color, thick full lips, etc.

And there are also general proportions and ratios that can make a face more harmonious and even more beautiful and aesthetically pleasing to the human brain. Such as eye spacing, facial third distribution, forehead width to cheekbone width, proportions of the lips or philtrum to the proportions of facial thirds, etc.

Things like that.

Now, naturally we use objective numerical values to measure these proportions and ratios on a face, see what measurements are unideal or unharmonious.

But with this process comes the issue that most of these 'ideal vs unideal' measurements and ratios that have been attributed numerical values becomes completely arbitrary and nothing more than just number porn.

Thus, these measurements and harmony percentage scores to gauge what's supposed to be objective beauty starts to makes no sense.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
N30N Ratings 2
dextermogin Off-Topic 6
N30N Ratings 34
alurmo Off-Topic 8

Similar threads


Back
Top