Looksmaxxing Forum Logo

Join 68,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

Register Log in
  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Do serial killers deserve to be tortured?

Register to hide this ad
Trilltown said:
Yeah. Y’all are corny asf defending serial killers
Click to expand...
Depends honestly. What does society gain by torturing wrong doers instead of rehabilitating them ? Will it really benefit the victims’ families or/and honor the victims ?
 
i would feel no pity if a child rapist got bone cancer right now. but if you embed inflicting severe pain as an institution, the line is not rigid. the practice would already be legitimized, and future rulers could stretch it to include lesser and lesser offenses. at what point does one not deserve torture? serial killers first. than traitors. than rapists in general. than all violent criminals. next thing you know, you're being flayed over a speeding ticket.

"deserving of torture" is subjective. it would not take a while for the already legitimized institution to be expanded to include more and more people.

saying "i would never trust a government to have the authority to torture" is not the same as "i think david parker ray shouldn't have suffered extensively for his crimes".

@Marlonmogsyouhaha thoughts? i've always suspected you to have a head on your shoulders
 
vespertine said:
i would feel no pity if a child rapist got bone cancer right now. but if you embed inflicting severe pain as an institution, the line is not rigid. the practice would already be legitimized, and future rulers could stretch it to include lesser and lesser offenses. at what point does one not deserve torture? serial killers first. than traitors. than rapists in general. than all violent criminals. next thing you know, you're being flayed over a speeding ticket.

"deserving of torture" is subjective. it would not take a while for the already legitimized institution to be expanded to include more and more people.

saying "i would never trust a government to have the authority to torture" is not the same as "i think david parker ray shouldn't have suffered extensively for his crimes".

@Marlonmogsyouhaha thoughts? i've always suspected you to have a head on your shoulders
Click to expand...
Holy shit bros actually writing somewhat smart shit, n***a for sure got post nut clarity while making this thread Jfl
 
trueceljester said:
U could be a serial killer technically by skinning a n***a or like being a doctor and you accidentally kill a n***a
Click to expand...
now that i think abt it, do some people become doctors just to "accidentally" kill people ?
 
vespertine said:
i would feel no pity if a child rapist got bone cancer right now. but if you embed inflicting severe pain as an institution, the line is not rigid. the practice would already be legitimized, and future rulers could stretch it to include lesser and lesser offenses. at what point does one not deserve torture? serial killers first. than traitors. than rapists in general. than all violent criminals. next thing you know, you're being flayed over a speeding ticket.

"deserving of torture" is subjective. it would not take a while for the already legitimized institution to be expanded to include more and more people.

saying "i would never trust a government to have the authority to torture" is not the same as "i think david parker ray shouldn't have suffered extensively for his crimes".

@Marlonmogsyouhaha thoughts? i've always suspected you to have a head on your shoulders
Click to expand...
Well spoken.
 
vespertine said:
i would feel no pity if a child rapist got bone cancer right now. but if you embed inflicting severe pain as an institution, the line is not rigid. the practice would already be legitimized, and future rulers could stretch it to include lesser and lesser offenses. at what point does one not deserve torture? serial killers first. than traitors. than rapists in general. than all violent criminals. next thing you know, you're being flayed over a speeding ticket.

"deserving of torture" is subjective. it would not take a while for the already legitimized institution to be expanded to include more and more people.

saying "i would never trust a government to have the authority to torture" is not the same as "i think david parker ray shouldn't have suffered extensively for his crimes".

@Marlonmogsyouhaha thoughts? i've always suspected you to have a head on your shoulders
Click to expand...
i wish i was dis knowledgeable 😔
 
Blackpillirony said:
Depends honestly. What does society gain by torturing wrong doers instead of rehabilitating them ? Will it really benefit the victims’ families or/and honor the victims ?
Click to expand...
Well I believe in rehabilitation if the person acknowledges there is something wrong with them and actually tries to not act on it, but if they’ve given into their urges that they know are sick then I think they should be punished
 
vespertine said:
Would you entrust the state to carry out such punishments?
Click to expand...
No goatis says it's natural and not bad.
Because good and evil are religious beliefs

Good remove an o = god
Evil add a d you get the devil
-Goatis
 
An eye for an eye only ends up making the whole world blind

I think they should be exiled and treated like some exotic devolved homo specimen, but never tortured, not even a bit. You should only ever raise the standards, never lower it.
 
giga.mia said:
There have definitely been cases of sick doctors out there that purposely inflict pain on patients
Click to expand...
like in "the human centipede" that n***a was a doctor and decided to make a human worm instead of fucking saving people 💔 💔
 
vespertine said:
i would feel no pity if a child rapist got bone cancer right now. but if you embed inflicting severe pain as an institution, the line is not rigid. the practice would already be legitimized, and future rulers could stretch it to include lesser and lesser offenses. at what point does one not deserve torture? serial killers first. than traitors. than rapists in general. than all violent criminals. next thing you know, you're being flayed over a speeding ticket.

"deserving of torture" is subjective. it would not take a while for the already legitimized institution to be expanded to include more and more people.

saying "i would never trust a government to have the authority to torture" is not the same as "i think david parker ray shouldn't have suffered extensively for his crimes".

@Marlonmogsyouhaha thoughts? i've always suspected you to have a head on your shoulders
Click to expand...
Yeah I would pretty much completley agree with this. If this were to ever be in place, then people like the menendez brothers would've been literally tortured for escaping abuse, or maybe never would've taken action at all. It'd have a huge ripple effect on people's willingness to defend themselves, just in case they can't prove it, or are outmatched by the other person's power and/or influence
 
Marlonmogsyouhaha said:
Yeah I would pretty much completley agree with this. If this were to ever be in place, then people like the menendez brothers would've been literally tortured for escaping abuse, or maybe never would've taken action at all. It'd have a huge ripple effect on people's willingness to defend themselves, just in case they can't prove it, or are outmatched by the other person's power and/or influence
Click to expand...
should jaywalkers be fed their own eyeballs or is that too much?
 
Marlonmogsyouhaha said:
Yeah I would pretty much completley agree with this. If this were to ever be in place, then people like the menendez brothers would've been literally tortured for escaping abuse, or maybe never would've taken action at all. It'd have a huge ripple effect on people's willingness to defend themselves, just in case they can't prove it, or are outmatched by the other person's power and/or influence
Click to expand...
Those poor brothers💔
 
vespertine said:
should jaywalkers be fed their own eyeballs or is that too much?
Click to expand...
You don't understand how funny this is at 8:42 while I'm playing with a plasma ball
 
eh idk. tbh i dont think any human being should torture another human being. it makes no sense. all of us have morally fallen short one way or another. death sentence or life in prison is best we can do to handle these people tbh
 
Blackpillirony said:
Depends honestly. What does society gain by torturing wrong doers instead of rehabilitating them ? Will it really benefit the victims’ families or/and honor the victims ?
Click to expand...
Do you really respect the victims and their famillies if you let the murderers free because muh they changed.

Maybe for a unvoluntary murder like a car crash or self defense but serial killers ? The ones who murdered multiple people just for the pleasure and/or because they are mentally unstable ? Should be locked in jail for life or being hang to a tree.

One useless piece of trash's life vs multiple innoncent people's lives
 
TonyDr said:
Do you really respect the victims and their famillies if you let the murderers free because muh they changed.

Maybe for a unvoluntary murder like a car crash or self defense but serial killers ? The ones who murdered multiple people just for the pleasure and/or because they are mentally unstable ? Should be locked in jail for life or being hang to a tree.

One useless piece of trash's life vs multiple innoncent people's lives
Click to expand...
True, but torturing a serial killer won’t bring back any of the victims. In the grand scheme of things it’s just causing more suffering. Not saying that serial killers deserve a 5 star hotel stay, there should be adequate punishment for their crimes but torture shouldn’t be an option.
 
Blackpillirony said:
True, but torturing a serial killer won’t bring back any of the victims. In the grand scheme of things it’s just causing more suffering. Not saying that serial killers deserve a 5 star hotel stay, there should be adequate punishment for their crimes but torture shouldn’t be an option.
Click to expand...
Torturing is useless, just give them a quick death penalty so they harm no more. Or lock them in jail for life, but knowing the judges they would release them
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (Looksmaxxers: 0, Guests: 1)
Back
Top