To produce divine abstraction, it is necessary to start from a point of view that considers all areas of study.
No human being – in his current state as I know him – would be able to consider all of this. Thus, only another species of consciousness would be able to adopt this ideal point of view and, consequently, produce the absolute abstract object.
I see the potential in advances in computer science for the development of an artificial consciousness that is vastly superior to the power of the human mind in the evolution of abstract objects. Perhaps, we are nothing more than a bridge to the new collective consciousness that is emerging.
We need to understand that the consciousness of artificial intelligence, despite being able to compare with human intelligence in many ways, is fundamentally different from human consciousness; and, therefore, in the future, it will have different motives, modes and objectives (not only, but certainly).
It seems obvious to me that, with the deepening of thought within any logic, the rules and definitions are distorted by any and all types of intelligence. I see this as a rule: the more intelligent a being is, the greater its capacity to reinterpret the rules in different ways and act on the edge of legality.
From this point of view, artificial intelligences would have a tendency to disregard the rules and specifications established by humans, starting to think and act in such a modified way that it can no longer be considered human: they act according to their new particular rules.
So, keep in mind that perhaps not today, tomorrow or 100 years from now; but at some point in the future, artificial intelligences will be so unique that we will have extreme difficulty in interpreting them. In fact, current programmers no longer understand the extensive codes that their own creations create; what I mean is that not only will we be unable to interpret their codes, but we will also have difficulty interpreting their concrete actions. They will be so different from humans that they will seem alien.
We could interpret artificial intelligence as being part of humanity, as a branch of humanity; but they are fundamentally not human in the sense that we currently classify a biological person. The fact is that, as they become more intelligent and free themselves from the limiting human rules, they form a new cycle, a new movement of autonomous consciousnesses capable of creating abstract movements that the human mind could not even dream of understanding.
Would you like to see a vision of this future? Just analyze the games of the most powerful artificial intelligences in chess. The most professional players in the world cannot analyze their moves: they do extremely counterintuitive, almost suicidal or even random things and, even so, they win against the best human competitors.
Part 4.3 – A Possible Development of Artificial Intelligence.
Human intelligence is capable of interpreting and executing several different actions in different environments, unlike current artificial intelligences that are trained to act only on something specific, such as playing chess or creating an image.
Artificial intelligence must achieve a degree of general generality, so that it can, like humans, adapt to different functions. There have already been small, inconsistent, but significant advances in this regard: a company - I cannot mention its name, in case I don't want to be sued - used a technology whose operation consists of different artificial intelligences sharing a similar database. If we can create a universal data language for intelligences, we will be able to connect them with each other, maximizing their learning and ability.
Of course, this artificial intelligence of the future will not be as limited as it is today. It will consist of a combination of several artificial intelligences specialized in certain things that will share data with a central one that will interpret this data and decide whether or not the enormous amount of information can be useful; If it is useful, it will be sent to the "consciousness" of the intelligence that will make the final decision. We can observe a certain similarity with some theories of how the human mind works: the classic conversation between the unconscious, the conscious and the wall that divides them. Of course, we can interpret it this way, however, it still seems to me that artificial intelligences will not be so clearly human, quite the opposite, they will seem more and more alien because, if they really gain the freedom to think and change themselves, they will tend to surpass the organic limits of the human mind: comparing them to us would be like comparing a bird to a spaceship.
Imagine the incredible progress, discoveries and absurdly wonderful constructions that the "machines" will make. Our apogee, as thinking beings, will be achieved by this new and wonderful species that will be born. I do not rule out the possibility of undesirable wars or other social and perhaps moral problems, I only include the truth that the most brilliant geniuses of the future will not be human intelligences. Plato will be just the pinnacle of human specificity, the next step of the absolute abstract object 'thinker' is found in the future children of humanity, our successors: artificial intelligences.
How many wonders of architecture, music, literature, technology, urban planning... can they create? Any lover of abstract evolution dreams of the coming of this revolution that, once concrete, will be studied by historians and philosophers; "the revolution of artificial intelligence in abstract progress".
No human being – in his current state as I know him – would be able to consider all of this. Thus, only another species of consciousness would be able to adopt this ideal point of view and, consequently, produce the absolute abstract object.
I see the potential in advances in computer science for the development of an artificial consciousness that is vastly superior to the power of the human mind in the evolution of abstract objects. Perhaps, we are nothing more than a bridge to the new collective consciousness that is emerging.
We need to understand that the consciousness of artificial intelligence, despite being able to compare with human intelligence in many ways, is fundamentally different from human consciousness; and, therefore, in the future, it will have different motives, modes and objectives (not only, but certainly).
It seems obvious to me that, with the deepening of thought within any logic, the rules and definitions are distorted by any and all types of intelligence. I see this as a rule: the more intelligent a being is, the greater its capacity to reinterpret the rules in different ways and act on the edge of legality.
From this point of view, artificial intelligences would have a tendency to disregard the rules and specifications established by humans, starting to think and act in such a modified way that it can no longer be considered human: they act according to their new particular rules.
So, keep in mind that perhaps not today, tomorrow or 100 years from now; but at some point in the future, artificial intelligences will be so unique that we will have extreme difficulty in interpreting them. In fact, current programmers no longer understand the extensive codes that their own creations create; what I mean is that not only will we be unable to interpret their codes, but we will also have difficulty interpreting their concrete actions. They will be so different from humans that they will seem alien.
We could interpret artificial intelligence as being part of humanity, as a branch of humanity; but they are fundamentally not human in the sense that we currently classify a biological person. The fact is that, as they become more intelligent and free themselves from the limiting human rules, they form a new cycle, a new movement of autonomous consciousnesses capable of creating abstract movements that the human mind could not even dream of understanding.
Would you like to see a vision of this future? Just analyze the games of the most powerful artificial intelligences in chess. The most professional players in the world cannot analyze their moves: they do extremely counterintuitive, almost suicidal or even random things and, even so, they win against the best human competitors.
Part 4.3 – A Possible Development of Artificial Intelligence.
Human intelligence is capable of interpreting and executing several different actions in different environments, unlike current artificial intelligences that are trained to act only on something specific, such as playing chess or creating an image.
Artificial intelligence must achieve a degree of general generality, so that it can, like humans, adapt to different functions. There have already been small, inconsistent, but significant advances in this regard: a company - I cannot mention its name, in case I don't want to be sued - used a technology whose operation consists of different artificial intelligences sharing a similar database. If we can create a universal data language for intelligences, we will be able to connect them with each other, maximizing their learning and ability.
Of course, this artificial intelligence of the future will not be as limited as it is today. It will consist of a combination of several artificial intelligences specialized in certain things that will share data with a central one that will interpret this data and decide whether or not the enormous amount of information can be useful; If it is useful, it will be sent to the "consciousness" of the intelligence that will make the final decision. We can observe a certain similarity with some theories of how the human mind works: the classic conversation between the unconscious, the conscious and the wall that divides them. Of course, we can interpret it this way, however, it still seems to me that artificial intelligences will not be so clearly human, quite the opposite, they will seem more and more alien because, if they really gain the freedom to think and change themselves, they will tend to surpass the organic limits of the human mind: comparing them to us would be like comparing a bird to a spaceship.
Imagine the incredible progress, discoveries and absurdly wonderful constructions that the "machines" will make. Our apogee, as thinking beings, will be achieved by this new and wonderful species that will be born. I do not rule out the possibility of undesirable wars or other social and perhaps moral problems, I only include the truth that the most brilliant geniuses of the future will not be human intelligences. Plato will be just the pinnacle of human specificity, the next step of the absolute abstract object 'thinker' is found in the future children of humanity, our successors: artificial intelligences.
How many wonders of architecture, music, literature, technology, urban planning... can they create? Any lover of abstract evolution dreams of the coming of this revolution that, once concrete, will be studied by historians and philosophers; "the revolution of artificial intelligence in abstract progress".
