Join 45,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

face is darker than body

I didnt use sunscreen for a long time... yeah ik it was dumb thing to do😭
Now i use sunscreen daily
Help me to fix this
Sunscreen bad, try eating fat rich diet and stop using harmful skincare products and sunscreen instead use beef tallow, coconut oil or butter to moisturise ur face and as natural sunscreen
 
Just keep using the sunscreen. Using retinoids might help in your case.
 
I didnt use sunscreen for a long time... yeah ik it was dumb thing to do😭
Now i use sunscreen daily
Help me to fix this
Dress like a whore and ur body will tan
 
go tanning by the pool or in ur backyard and wear like a triangle bikini, cover ur face w a hat during it and ur body will be tanner and u get cute tan lines! if u dont like staying outside for a long time use the hawaiian tropic tanning oil it makes u tan superr fast
 
It doesn’t if u have enough cholesterol in ur body, the uv rays in this case will only convert the cholesterol into vitamin d3
That's not true. I think I understand the process you're referring to, but don't see how it's relevant to the conclusion that it prevents UV radiation from causing cancer and that you should avoid sunscreen. I'm actually a bit flabbergasted in how they're related. You might have to expand a bit more.

I made a thread about this subject, if you'd like to learn more:
 
That's not true. I think I understand the process you're referring to, but don't see how it's relevant to the conclusion that it prevents UV radiation from causing cancer and that you should avoid sunscreen. I'm actually a bit flabbergasted in how they're related. You might have to expand a bit more.

I made a thread about this subject, if you'd like to learn more:
Hmm, I will look into also I wanna add up, that the chemicals used in sunscreens are bs and are endocrine disrupters and also other harmful stuffs,


This study is an estimate

 
Hmm, I will look into also I wanna add up, that the chemicals used in sunscreens are bs and are endocrine disrupters and also other harmful stuffs,


This study is an estimate

As a consumer, you should look into the ingredients you use. Some companies use ingredients in food that's really harmful. The conclusion should not be 'Don't eat food', it should be 'pick something that has ingredients you feel comfortable with '. Sunscreen is made in several ways (chemical vs mineral as an example). You will have options.
 
As a consumer, you should look into the ingredients you use. Some companies use ingredients in food that's really harmful. The conclusion should not be 'Don't eat food', it should be 'pick something that has ingredients you feel comfortable with '. Sunscreen is made in several ways (chemical vs mineral as an example). You will have options.
This is showing that mineral based sunscreen are not a good option

And of course chemical based is bad as I shown studies above
 
As a consumer, you should look into the ingredients you use. Some companies use ingredients in food that's really harmful. The conclusion should not be 'Don't eat food', it should be 'pick something that has ingredients you feel comfortable with '. Sunscreen is made in several ways (chemical vs mineral as an example). You will have options.
Also excessive sun burn is caused by high amounts of omega 6 present in ur body which leads to inflammations
 
As a consumer, you should look into the ingredients you use. Some companies use ingredients in food that's really harmful. The conclusion should not be 'Don't eat food', it should be 'pick something that has ingredients you feel comfortable with '. Sunscreen is made in several ways (chemical vs mineral as an example). You will have options.

Studies prove that omega 3 intake reduces sub burn and inflammations, that is why raw animal fat is superior, if u get easily sun burned even when u are living in a place which is ur ethnicity, this shows ur body has lot of inflammations caused by omega 6 fatty acids
 
This is showing that mineral based sunscreen are not a good option

And of course chemical based is bad as I shown studies above
This song and dance we do every time is normally exhausting because in most cases it's clear you don't fully understand what you're saying.

The breast cancer link talks about the importance of sunscreen and that there's no evidence it causes breast cancer (it's on the very top), the 'trouble with sunscreen ingredients' link is mainly asking for the FDA to change its review process and to mainly avoid oxybenzone (it even mentions some mineral sunscreen ingredients that are safe, also on top) and the first study says that there's not enough evidence to show these ingredients cause harm to humans just that it might have the potential to.

I don't plan to read the rest because it's clear you haven't read them, so why should I?

You are just confidently incorrect in a lot of cases. I love your desire to learn and share information with others, but you're just normally incorrect.

I always point out the flaws in the studies or links you share, and it doesn't seem like you've made any effort to take the time to understand what you send. I thought you would've made some change by now. I can't have a discussion with someone where I spend a majority of the time pointing out basic flaws in what they send me, because it's not interesting to me as someone who seeks discussion.

This might be a discussion you can have in the future, but it's clear it's not one you should have now. Sunscreen is good in a majority of cases and your advice to avoid it goes against science. There's not much more to say besides that.
 
This song and dance we do every time is normally exhausting because in most cases it's clear you don't fully understand what you're saying.

The breast cancer link talks about the importance of sunscreen and that there's no evidence it causes breast cancer (it's on the very top), the 'trouble with sunscreen ingredients' link is mainly asking for the FDA to change its review process and to mainly avoid oxybenzone (it even mentions some mineral sunscreen ingredients that are safe, also on top) and the first study says that there's not enough evidence to show these ingredients cause harm to humans just that it might have the potential to.

I don't plan to read the rest because it's clear you haven't read them, so why should I?

You are just confidently incorrect in a lot of cases. I love your desire to learn and share information with others, but you're just normally incorrect.

I always point out the flaws in the studies or links you share, and it doesn't seem like you've made any effort to take the time to understand what you send. I thought you would've made some change by now. I can't have a discussion with someone where I spend a majority of the time pointing out basic flaws in what they send me, because it's not interesting to me as someone who seeks discussion.

This might be a discussion you can have in the future, but it's clear it's not one you should have now. Sunscreen is good in a majority of cases and your advice to avoid it goes against science. There's not much more to say besides that.
I never said sunscreen caused cancer according to these studies, I pointed out the questionable ingredients present in them via studies, it also depends on ur ethnicity, vitamin d3 is very crucial for us, practising sun avoidance is not good for us human beings
 
I never said sunscreen caused cancer according to these studies, I pointed out the questionable ingredients present in them via studies, it also depends on ur ethnicity, vitamin d3 is very crucial for us, practising sun avoidance is not good for us human beings
I never claimed you said anything about cancer? The link is by a breast cancer organization. As I said later in the paragraph about the first study, it doesn't state there's any harm to humans. It doesn't appear to effect thyroid function, for example.

If you mean because of the vitamin D deficiency, you fix it by taking a supplement. Most people who are experiencing sun avoidance are people who do not leave the house and it's not normally related to sunscreen. Most people who wear sunscreen are not avoiding the sun.

As I said previously, the advice of 'avoid sunscreen ' is incorrect. If it's specific ingredients you're concerned about, you avoid those ingredients, not sunscreen as a whole. Nothing you've said supports your original argument, and I don't want to keep going through random links just for me to explain to you that the link you sent does not say what you think it says.

If the OP wants to reduce the sun exposure on her face, she should continue to wear sunscreen. It's very simple.
 
I never claimed you said anything about cancer? The link is by a breast cancer organization. As I said later in the paragraph about the first study, it doesn't state there's any harm to humans. It doesn't appear to effect thyroid function, for example.

If you mean because of the vitamin D deficiency, you fix it by taking a supplement. Most people who are experiencing sun avoidance are people who do not leave the house and it's not normally related to sunscreen. Most people who wear sunscreen are not avoiding the sun.

As I said previously, the advice of 'avoid sunscreen ' is incorrect. If it's specific ingredients you're concerned about, you avoid those ingredients, not sunscreen as a whole. Nothing you've said supports your original argument, and I don't want to keep going through random links just for me to explain to you that the link you sent does not say what you think it says.

If the OP wants to reduce the sun exposure on her face, she should continue to wear sunscreen. It's very simple.
Supplements? You recommend supplements, so u recommend synthetic vitamins and heavy metals into her body? Supplements will can never replace natural vitamins u get from food and sun
 
I never claimed you said anything about cancer? The link is by a breast cancer organization. As I said later in the paragraph about the first study, it doesn't state there's any harm to humans. It doesn't appear to effect thyroid function, for example.

If you mean because of the vitamin D deficiency, you fix it by taking a supplement. Most people who are experiencing sun avoidance are people who do not leave the house and it's not normally related to sunscreen. Most people who wear sunscreen are not avoiding the sun.

As I said previously, the advice of 'avoid sunscreen ' is incorrect. If it's specific ingredients you're concerned about, you avoid those ingredients, not sunscreen as a whole. Nothing you've said supports your original argument, and I don't want to keep going through random links just for me to explain to you that the link you sent does not say what you think it says.

If the OP wants to reduce the sun exposure on her face, she should continue to wear sunscreen. It's very simple.
If OP wants to reduce her tan, she should eat lots omega 3 rich foods and also it depends on her ethnicity, if she is north European or Australian, then she could have pale skin naturally, eating a diet rich in fish and meat would help her. If she is an immigrant then yeah sure she can avoid sun, depends on ur ethnicity and ur place. Omega 3 naturally reduces damages caused by the sun
 
Back
Top