Join 75,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

fall 26' is the ONLY wait to beat hypergamy

Adamlul

Cute Boy Summer / Flush Boy Fall ‘26
Established
Joined
Jun 27, 2026
Messages
1,101
Online time
3d 10h
Reputation
1,400
cardigans turtle necks silver jewlery frameless glasses black jackets bombers leathers crossbodies etc and most importantly a flushed face whos ready boys

 
Register to hide this ad
Hypergamy isn't as common as stated. People date their looksmatch or under their looksmatch all the time. It's just more common in the audience this type of content attracts.
Cope ahh statement imo

This is usually because a woman settles when she can't keep Chad. But she'll leave LTN for a man with a higher SMV any day
 
Cope ahh statement imo

This is usually because a woman settles when she can't keep Chad. But she'll leave LTN for a man with a higher SMV any day
Men will also leave a LTN for a woman with higher SMV. As I said, depends on the character not the gender
 
Men will also leave a LTN for a woman with higher SMV. As I said, depends on the character not the gender
These are two different things though because you also have to realize any average woman has plenty of options in partners, but an average man has nearly zero or none at all. Also women naturally look to marry up whereas men are generally content with a stable, loyal partner who treats them well, regardless of her social status. So it does depend on the gender because each are wired with different psychology, and we've seen this though out the entirety of man kind.
 
cardigans turtle necks silver jewlery frameless glasses black jackets bombers leathers crossbodies etc and most importantly a flushed face whos ready boys


Lol thats me
 
These are two different things though because you also have to realize any average woman has plenty of options in partners, but an average man has nearly zero or none at all. Also women naturally look to marry up whereas men are generally content with a stable, loyal partner who treats them well, regardless of her social status. So it does depend on the gender because each are wired with different psychology, and we've seen this though out the entirety of man kind.
as I said, these kinds of women are more common in the communities you engage in. I surround myself with good people that do not do these things, carrying the same morals as mine. Many women are also very content with a stable loyal partner regardless their looks. I am not saying all, but you are seeing a higher frequency of the opposite due to the sites and communities you find yourself in. If you take a quick look at all the options women have available, very few are men of good heart, and therefore, bad options. This whole forum is crawling with men such as yourself who prioritize looks over everything else. Of course you are going to attract women who want looks over all else too. You share common interests.

And no, if you look at evolution and psychology you will very easily see that it is the men who want to mate with as many women as possible while women want a stable partner as they are the ones that have a 9 month vunerability period and need care during that time of pregnancy.
 
as I said, these kinds of women are more common in the communities you engage in. I surround myself with good people that do not do these things, carrying the same morals as mine. Many women are also very content with a stable loyal partner regardless their looks. I am not saying all, but you are seeing a higher frequency of the opposite due to the sites and communities you find yourself in. If you take a quick look at all the options women have available, very few are men of good heart, and therefore, bad options. This whole forum is crawling with men such as yourself who prioritize looks over everything else. Of course you are going to attract women who want looks over all else too. You share common interests.

And no, if you look at evolution and psychology you will very easily see that it is the men who want to mate with as many women as possible while women want a stable partner as they are the ones that have a 9 month vunerability period and need care during that time of pregnancy.
You do make a decent argument, however You are confusing a woman's desire for safety with her standard for who qualifies to provide it. A man's evolutionary drive to mate doesn't give him the actual options to do so, women hold the absolute power of selection. Also You are judging the entire dating market based on your personal friend group and the people you know which contradicts what you said about people in the communities im in.
 
Hypergamy isn't as common as stated. People date their looksmatch or under their looksmatch all the time. It's just more common in the audience this type of content attracts.
In high school and college hypergamy is much more true than after those.
A woman would much more rather sit in a nice house with a 6+ than be poor with 7/8 or even 9+ though it's unlikely anything 8+ would be poor although not impossible (using test score ratings here, might all be lower based on bell curve rating).
Much of the looksmaxxing community seems to have come out of high school/college based individuals (though LM'ing is still a very real and valid philosophy).
 
In high school and college hypergamy is much more true than after those.
A woman would much more rather sit in a nice house with a 6+ than be poor with 7/8 or even 9+ though it's unlikely anything 8+ would be poor although not impossible (using test score ratings here, might all be lower based on bell curve rating).
Much of the looksmaxxing community seems to have come out of high school/college based individuals (though LM'ing is still a very real and valid philosophy).
This is the exact point I am tryna make lol. Thank you @VRYAH
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top