Rage female gaze/pretty boy/twink reevaluated/debunked

[looksmaxxed]

why would a 6'6 robust jock bully who gets sex on demand ever think that mousy effete hollywood celebrities like timothy chalamet and tom holland were the epitome of female attraction? and why would he ever humiliate himself by styling himself after them?

female gaze is obviously cope for losers who get shoved in lockers and dunked in urinals. it's the looksmax equivalent of the pua concept of sigmas. genetically inferior omegas who can't compete with alphas and betas so they invent arbitrary parameters and criteria in which they are "the best". this delusion is further enforced by hollywood promoting ugly twink faggots to top positions to help these losers cope.

female gaze/femboy ideology is a byproduct of civilizaitional decadence. it's the "tails" created by weak men to rationalize their weakness and pure inferiority as a virtue, while expecting positive outcomes as a result. you can't have a society that selects for weakness, which preening pretentious fops like female gaze copers are, and expect strength and virility as a consequence. there must be objective universal standards for how we judge attraction that is rooted in scientific observations and facts, divorced from socially conditioned variables like whatever's popular on tv or social media. and this is what female gaze should actually reflect. female gaze should describe men who look and function like this:

this also necessitates that twinks, prettyboys, and "female gaze" maxxers stop coping and propagating their delusions and giving false hope to subhumans who would better off be helping chad breed instead of competing with chad with their eyeliners cringey mop hair, and horrendous upper eyelid exposure. i would go so far as to say men like timothy chalemet should be actively sabotaged and killed if necessary for being the antithesis to what society most requires at the moment.

tldr: female gaze are just incels in denial with an extra step

 

[IMPORTANT:]

why would a 6'6 robust jock bully who gets sex on demand ever think that mousy effete hollywood celebrities like timothy chalamet and tom holland were the epitome of female attraction? and why would he ever humiliate himself by styling himself after them?

female gaze is obviously cope for losers who get shoved in lockers and dunked in urinals. it's the looksmax equivalent of the pua concept of sigmas. genetically inferior omegas who can't compete with alphas and betas so they invent arbitrary parameters and criteria in which they are "the best". this delusion is further enforced by hollywood promoting ugly twink faggots to top positions to help these losers cope.

female gaze/femboy ideology is a byproduct of civilizaitional decadence. it's the "tails" created by weak men to rationalize their weakness and pure inferiority as a virtue, while expecting positive outcomes as a result. you can't have a society that selects for weakness, which preening pretentious fops like female gaze copers are, and expect strength and virility as a consequence. there must be objective universal standards for how we judge attraction that is rooted in scientific observations and facts, divorced from socially conditioned variables like whatever's popular on tv or social media. and this is what female gaze should actually reflect. female gaze should describe men who look and function like this:

View attachment 231115
View attachment 231116

this also necessitates that twinks, prettyboys, and "female gaze" maxxers stop coping and propagating their delusions and giving false hope to subhumans who would better off be helping chad breed instead of competing with chad with their eyeliners cringey mop hair, and horrendous upper eyelid exposure. i would go so far as to say men like timothy chalemet should be actively sabotaged and killed if necessary for being the antithesis to what society most requires at the moment.

tldr: female gaze are just incels in denial with an extra step

every good girl needs a lil thug

 

[IMPORTANT:]

Agreed as a Pajeet moid

Actually our males are the reason they are like that. Males tolerate their wrong behaviour in the name of simping. Men give them too much attention and orbit around them like faggots. If a girl slaps a boy, boy does nothing.

Men are the reason for their princess syndrome. Men are the reason for their egoistic behaviour. Also looks don't matter that much here. We have excess men, less women. Competition is none for foids. We have simps sitting in Supreme Court who do anything to impress women.

Men, you should stop appreciating women. Try to keep their self-esteem low. Actually this could be reason why some Pajeets marry white foids. Unfortunately, those pajeets are top tier males and white foids are mid or below average in their respective lands.

 

[+Enrique+]

i guess

 

[failednormieemocel]

timothy chalamet and tom holland

bad examples, theres a bunch of random tiktok thirst trappers that get way more attention from this generation and usually they have narrow jaws, high gonial angles, etc