Join 45,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Hypothesis Foids look worse than moids

Joined
Mar 29, 2025
Messages
68
Time Online
3h 29m
Reputation
93
Men are better looking than women, but because of women's high standards and men's low standards it is hard to realize. Think about, why would the gender under less sexual selection evolve faster? The fact women are judged less harshly should prove my point entirely.

All foids have to do is look good is have face and have fat in the right places, they don't need to be lean, tall, have defined facial features, broad shoulders, etc.

The fact height is never selected for in women should make this obvious, because the height of the mother matters just as much as that father, but it is never considered.
 
Men are better looking than women, but because of women's high standards and men's low standards it is hard to realize. Think about, why would the gender under less sexual selection evolve faster? The fact women are judged less harshly should prove my point entirely.

All foids have to do is look good is have face and have fat in the right places, they don't need to be lean, tall, have defined facial features, broad shoulders, etc.

The fact height is never selected for in women should make this obvious, because the height of the mother matters just as much as that father, but it is never considered.
Your comparison using height is flawed. Height has been specifically valued in men for decades, if not longer. Men and women are judged by different standards when it comes to attraction, and what’s considered desirable in one gender isn’t always the same in the other. For example, features like doe eyes might be seen as attractive on women but undesirable on men. While a strong jawline/ square faceshape might be praised in men but considered harsh or unfeminine on women.
 
Then why am I borderline subhuman if women barley have to do anything ig it's the fat thing
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top