- Joined
- Sep 5, 2025
- Messages
- 2,862
- Solutions
- 2
- Time Online
- 14d 3h
- Reputation
- 13,743
abstract:
this study aimed to determine which fine shyt demonstrated the highest responsiveness to a standardized rizz stimulus. using a controlled experimental design, identical flirtatious comments were administered across four independent subjects. a consistent variable, @glamourpursuer 2.0 , administered an unplanned control response “yea u are” across all trials. data suggests significant variance in rizz receptivity, with one subject displaying notably elevated enthusiasm
introduction:
rizz responsiveness is a critical metric in assessing interpersonal charm dynamics within online environments. the present study explores behavioral differences among four fine shyts following exposure to identical rizz stimuli
pompom’s hypothesis:
fine shyt #2 (sovvton) will yield the most engaged response, indicating superior rizz receptivity
methodology:
subjects: four subjects, herein referred to as fine shyt 1–4
stimulus: identical rizz comment posted on each fine shyt’s profile
control variable: glamourpursuer, a commenter whose default reply “yea u are”appeared consistently
dependent variable: degree of enthusiasm, flirtatious reciprocity
data collection period: immediate post-comment observation phase
results:
fine shyt 1: @AuggyDauggy
HOLY AIRBALL
fine shyt displayed total emotional resistance (did he even see it?!??! wtf?!???)
fine shyt 2: @Sovvton X
wow…
haha… ok
displayed high emotional intensity, suggesting strong engagement
fine shyt 3: @Nairod
HOLY AIRBALL x2
(it’s ok tho he’s been inactive since september
)
likely immune to stimuli
fine shyt 4: @iluvegirl (psychomandible, baptist homo)
autistic but predicted response pattern. self-referential and detached from main stimulus (does he even recognize my rizz?????)
conclusion:
findings support the hypothesis: fine shyt 2 exhibited superior rizz reactivity.
future research directions:
increase sample size (more fine shytsssss
)
anyway i am in my monk era. so no future experiments/research
this study aimed to determine which fine shyt demonstrated the highest responsiveness to a standardized rizz stimulus. using a controlled experimental design, identical flirtatious comments were administered across four independent subjects. a consistent variable, @glamourpursuer 2.0 , administered an unplanned control response “yea u are” across all trials. data suggests significant variance in rizz receptivity, with one subject displaying notably elevated enthusiasm
introduction:
rizz responsiveness is a critical metric in assessing interpersonal charm dynamics within online environments. the present study explores behavioral differences among four fine shyts following exposure to identical rizz stimuli
pompom’s hypothesis:
fine shyt #2 (sovvton) will yield the most engaged response, indicating superior rizz receptivity
methodology:
subjects: four subjects, herein referred to as fine shyt 1–4
stimulus: identical rizz comment posted on each fine shyt’s profile
control variable: glamourpursuer, a commenter whose default reply “yea u are”appeared consistently
dependent variable: degree of enthusiasm, flirtatious reciprocity
data collection period: immediate post-comment observation phase
results:
fine shyt 1: @AuggyDauggy
HOLY AIRBALL
fine shyt displayed total emotional resistance (did he even see it?!??! wtf?!???)
fine shyt 2: @Sovvton X
wow…
haha… okdisplayed high emotional intensity, suggesting strong engagement
fine shyt 3: @Nairod
HOLY AIRBALL x2
(it’s ok tho he’s been inactive since september
)likely immune to stimuli
fine shyt 4: @iluvegirl (psychomandible, baptist homo)
autistic but predicted response pattern. self-referential and detached from main stimulus (does he even recognize my rizz?????)
conclusion:
findings support the hypothesis: fine shyt 2 exhibited superior rizz reactivity.
future research directions:
increase sample size (more fine shytsssss
)anyway i am in my monk era. so no future experiments/research
