πŸŽ„ Join 58,000+ Looksmaxxing Members! πŸŽ„

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

goated user died today πŸ˜°πŸ˜”

Register to hide this ad
Darkeningstar
 
Add to that β€œyes man” and the classic β€œstudy or source otherwise it's not true” approach and the result is grotesque
give me the study that says this is true
 

~β€”β€’ APATHEIA β€’β€”~​


Add to that β€œyes man” and the classic β€œstudy or source otherwise it's not true” approach and the result is grotesque

@Quicksand

"Yes man"

I have disagreed with users I like, if that is what you are referring to.

But, in my more recent comments, I will admit, I was being a "yes man".

"classic β€œstudy or source otherwise it's not true” approach"

Going back to my recent posts, I was not in any shape to talk about the relation of IQ and EQ, but regarding the "lookism blackpill" which is my main focus on these forums, I have tried to debate with users in evolutionary psychology in terms of the "lookism blackpill", and they say studies support their opinions such as @kapp747, @GUPAGUPA, @Patrickbatman when I ask for the said studies, they never seem to deliver and when they do they did not even read over the study themselves (GupaGupa), recommended me some reality tv show (Patrickbatman) or just insult me. (kapp747)

On the other hand, I also ask for their studies because I am genuinely curious about how they came to a certain conclusion, and see if I can use their citations to add to my "knowledgeability" of the subject.

Ultimately, the "blackpill" wants to be rooted in science, specifically evolutionary psychology. That is why I use evolutionary psychology to defend my positions.

But, I have only found the "lookism blackpill" to be mainly empty and exaggerated with only nuggets of truth within it so far. Just an extremely flawed ideology that sees the opposite gender/dating/mate preferences as binary.

How do you say I can improve as a user?

worst post format ever
who tf has their sig on top?

The "sig" is not going away though.
 

~β€”β€’ APATHEIA β€’β€”~​




@Quicksand



I have disagreed with users I like, if that is what you are referring to.

But, in my more recent comments, I will admit, I was being a "yes man".



Going back to my recent posts, I was not in any shape to talk about the relation of IQ and EQ, but regarding the "lookism blackpill" which is my main focus on these forums, I have tried to debate with users in evolutionary psychology in terms of the "lookism blackpill", and they say studies support their opinions such as @kapp747, @GUPAGUPA, @Patrickbatman when I ask for the said studies, they never seem to deliver and when they do they did not even read over the study themselves (GupaGupa), recommended me some reality tv show (Patrickbatman) or just insult me. (kapp747)

On the other hand, I also ask for their studies because I am genuinely curious about how they came to a certain conclusion, and see if I can use their citations to add to my "knowledgeability" of the subject.

Ultimately, the "blackpill" wants to be rooted in science, specifically evolutionary psychology. That is why I use evolutionary psychology to defend my positions.

But, I have only found the "lookism blackpill" to be mainly empty and exaggerated with only nuggets of truth within it so far. Just an extremely flawed ideology that sees the opposite gender/dating/mate preferences as binary.

How do you say I can improve as a user?



The "sig" is not going away though.
HOLY SHIT YOU’RE BACK
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top