🎄 Join 58,000+ Looksmaxxing Members! 🎄

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Guys should I remove the sigmoid or keep it in my formula?

Keep the sigmoid?

  • Yes

    Votes: 4 66.7%
  • No (Please explain why to me.)

    Votes: 2 33.3%

  • Total voters
    6
  • Poll closed .

Deleted Member 55049

TexasRed
Reputable
Established
Joined
Dec 26, 2024
Messages
1,991
Solutions
1
Time Online
7d 3h
Reputation
8,343
A sigmoid squashes numbers, so you can't be a merchant anymore.

I'll give you an example:
H 9.23
A 7
D 7
M 7

On my old formula it would be a: 7.78 or a high-CL.

However, with a sigmoid it's going to be a: 6.85. So, people who are merchants on one side would not benefit as much *cough* *cough* Tom Cruise. From what I've seen this is pretty accurate; however, it might include some underrating to some people who use a similar formula to the one above. So, please tell me if I should keep it or remove it.

 
Register to hide this ad
Will a sigmoid not cause the ratings to be compressed more towards the mean?
That would help people who are slightly below average, but fuck people slightly above.

I'd say keeping it out would be the better choice.
 
Will a sigmoid not cause the ratings to be compressed more towards the mean?
That would help people who are slightly below average, but fuck people slightly above.

I'd say keeping it out would be the better choice.
Right, but I could also say that well a increase in attractiveness from a 8 to an 8.5 is less noticeable than a 5.5 to a 6.
So, a sigmoid kinda mimics that feeling we get. Like look at Archie and Marlon. People say Marlon is on the same attractiveness as archie
Even tho objectively Marlon is a 7.35 and Archie is like a 7.8.

But, you'll never see this debate about a High-MTN to Low-HTN
 
Will a sigmoid not cause the ratings to be compressed more towards the mean?
That would help people who are slightly below average, but fuck people slightly above.

I'd say keeping it out would be the better choice.
You might be right mess. I'll remove it, seems too unfair. Maybe too harsh on some people
 
A sigmoid squashes numbers, so you can't be a merchant anymore.

I'll give you an example:
H 9.23
A 7
D 7
M 7

On my old formula it would be a: 7.78 or a high-CL.

However, with a sigmoid it's going to be a: 6.85. So, people who are merchants on one side would not benefit as much *cough* *cough* Tom Cruise. From what I've seen this is pretty accurate; however, it might include some underrating to some people who use a similar formula to the one above. So, please tell me if I should keep it or remove it.

Just make the rating system so that I'm chad and not ltn
 
A sigmoid squashes numbers, so you can't be a merchant anymore.

I'll give you an example:
H 9.23
A 7
D 7
M 7

On my old formula it would be a: 7.78 or a high-CL.

However, with a sigmoid it's going to be a: 6.85. So, people who are merchants on one side would not benefit as much *cough* *cough* Tom Cruise. From what I've seen this is pretty accurate; however, it might include some underrating to some people who use a similar formula to the one above. So, please tell me if I should keep it or remove it.

What is the m in the rating, I’m pretty sure the others are angularity harmony and dimorphism but what would the m be
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top