Join 58,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Discussion Having a type is a low sentience trait

Joined
Oct 8, 2025
Messages
17
Time Online
6h 3m
Reputation
47
Having a set of arbitrary physical requirements that dictate whether you'd date someone is a robotic npc trait

That's why blackpill ideology is deemed inherently misogynistic because it tends to portray all women as behaving this way (majority undeniably are but I don't believe it applies to every single one)

But a lot of men have the same thought process (e.g. "i'd only date x race"). And I just can't take people like that seriously.

If she's gl then she's gl
 
Register to hide this ad
this is wrong


to make a better argument you could have just said a "type" is a fetish and that's why most men would choose someone of a race even if there is a better looking person but they don't match his "type"

I've seen this happen far too often and it's true
 
Thanks for the high iq replies guys
Having a "type" is literally a fetish though man you are wrong

you didn't even really hold a argument yourself you basically just texted a load of bullshit with your claim at the bottom
 
Having a "type" is literally a fetish though man you are wrong

you didn't even really hold a argument yourself you basically just texted a load of bullshit with your claim at the bottom
Lowkey feel like the word "fetish" describes this in a weird freaky way. But I agree with your point
 
Having a set of arbitrary physical requirements that dictate whether you'd date someone is a robotic npc trait

That's why blackpill ideology is deemed inherently misogynistic because it tends to portray all women as behaving this way (majority undeniably are but I don't believe it applies to every single one)

But a lot of men have the same thought process (e.g. "i'd only date x race"). And I just can't take people like that seriously.

If she's gl then she's gl
this is real this is real

but then again having a type "evolutionarily" is about being able to pick out which mate is best fit to carry/ give you kids. Before today's civilization, it was probably way more necessary to have a type than it is now
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top