Join 49,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Here's what I don't get about the feminist criticism of the Sydney Sweeney ad...

ZoomerPsycho

I refuse to die until things are better
Joined
Oct 18, 2024
Messages
243
Time Online
18h 57m
Reputation
571
Location
United States
Feminist and ugly sub5 women are calling the Sydney Sweeney ad racist cause she said she has "good jeans' (genes) for having blue eyes and blonde hair

But how come the feminists and sub5 women are mad? Shouldn't they agree since they always go for Chads with blonde hair blue eyes too? If feminists disagree with the ad, how come they don't wanna date Pajeets and Asians? Shouldn't the feminists and sub5 women agree that Aryan Chads have good genes since they all have a preference for them?

That's why I can't take the liberal feminist criticism of Sydney Sweeney ad seriously. Women have no problem discriminating against men with bad genes
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top