Looksmaxxing Forum Logo

Join 54,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

Register Log in
  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

I fucking hate sheboons

hannah said:
what is there to dislike?
Click to expand...
the bodies are fine imo its just that

(i mean this in the least racist way possible. i cannot stress that enough that this is as unsubjective as i can be)

the attitude of *some* black women is that of monstrous baboons of sewer people that cannot be trusted in stores or around civilized society and absolutely love to complain and take absolutely zero accountability for their life situations all while raising thugs on food stamps who would go on in life to line the pockets of private prison ceo's
 
nawtsi said:
it's cause i associate their n****r mannerisms with their faces
its just pattern recognition atp
Click to expand...
1000009535.jpg
 
vespertine said:
the bodies are fine imo its just that

(i mean this in the least racist way possible. i cannot stress that enough that this is as unsubjective as i can be)

the attitude of *some* black women is that of monstrous baboons of sewer people that cannot be trusted in stores or around civilized society and absolutely love to complain and take absolutely zero accountability for their life situations all while raising thugs on food stamps who would go on in life to line the pockets of private prison ceo's
Click to expand...
i guess ive just never got to experience this because in the areas ive lived in, most black women are civilized and just like any other person, no ghetto ppl here. i can see the distaste towards ghetto people though
 
hannah said:
i guess ive just never got to experience this because in the areas ive lived in, most black women are civilized and just like any other person, no ghetto ppl here. i can see the distaste towards ghetto people though
Click to expand...
I live around ghetto blacks rn as we speak they deserve death but my neighbor is a black women she's the kindest person Ibe meet shes a nurse and she's curvy (had to throw it in) I think people online think all blacks the same which is a like low iq of seeing the world around you
 
nawtsi said:
Holy fucking makeup and filter fraud
I will never understand why they cake on makeup so much more than any other race
fucking hell man THE LASHES TOO
Click to expand...
Because make-up is beautiful also arabs and Indians use makeup way more
 
Clone said:
I live around ghetto blacks rn as we speak they deserve death but my neighbor is a black women she's the kindest person Ibe meet shes a nurse and she's curvy (had to throw it in) I think people online think all blacks the same which is a like low iq of seeing the world around you
Click to expand...
all blacks are definitely not the same its just majority of the american ones are retarded asf
 
Clone said:
I live around ghetto blacks rn as we speak they deserve death but my neighbor is a black women she's the kindest person Ibe meet shes a nurse and she's curvy (had to throw it in) I think people online think all blacks the same which is a like low iq of seeing the world around you
Click to expand...
did you ejaculate inside her yet
 
nawtsi said:
all blacks are definitely not the same its just majority of the american ones are retarded asf
Click to expand...
Not all American ones either that's what you call generalization
 
nawtsi said:
View attachment 200800
You only ever see american sheboons doing this retarded shit
Click to expand...
this is acc more popular in the uk, and its crazy to say that the majority of black women are like that. sure it is more popular in their group, but not the majority
 
@FORUM it seems some people are afraid of pussy 🤷‍♂️
 
Clone said:
Post extreme example theory I've never and neither have you seen women with this long of lashes
Click to expand...
Yeah im cherry picking but still, the makeup and filters these girls use are just excessive bruh
1761366657950.png

like cmon brah none of them look like this irl
this doesnt just apply to only black women tho plently of these instagram models fraud no matter what race i think ur just an idiot if youre attracted to these filter infested faces
 
Clone said:
All anglos are pure bred due to inbreeding that's why they were roman slaves
Click to expand...

1. “How inbred Anglos are compared to other populations”​


Genetic studies of modern English (and broader Anglo) populations show low levels of inbreeding by historical standards.


  • Pre-industrial rural isolation: Before mass transportation, small communities everywhere (not just in England) had higher “runs of homozygosity,” i.e., more genetic similarity, because people tended to marry within a few miles. That wasn’t unique to “Anglos.”
  • Modern England: Genome-wide data (e.g., UK Biobank studies) show that inbreeding coefficients in modern Britons are among the lowest recorded, comparable to other large, urbanized European populations.
  • Comparison: Some isolated mountain or island populations (e.g., in the Caucasus or Iceland) show higher endogamy; England, by contrast, has had constant migration — Celts, Romans, Saxons, Vikings, Normans, later global influxes — which diluted any inbreeding.

In short: “Anglos” are one of the least inbred populations in Europe today, and probably have been for centuries.

2. “To what extent were the peoples of England Roman slaves?”​


Only marginally and briefly.


  • When Rome invaded Britain in 43 CE, they conquered southern and central Britain. Some native Britons were enslaved and exported to the continent — the Roman economy was slave-heavy.
  • But most Britons were not individually enslaved; they became provincial subjects under Roman rule, paying taxes and serving in the army.
  • The Roman system was not based on ethnically targeted slavery — it was pragmatic and opportunistic. Romans enslaved whoever they conquered, from Gauls to Greeks to Syrians.
  • After the Roman withdrawal (~410 CE), Britain was no longer under Roman control. By that time, the Anglo-Saxon ancestors of “Anglos” hadn’t even arrived yet — they came from northern Germany and Denmark in the 5th–6th centuries.

So: the ancestors of “Anglos” were never Roman slaves, and the Britons who were enslaved under Rome weren’t enslaved for being “inbred.”


3. “Was inbreeding the reason for any slavery imposed on them?”​


No, that idea is historically incoherent.


Slavery in the Roman world was a matter of conquest, debt, or birth, not genetics.
Romans didn’t even have a concept of “inbreeding” as a social marker; they enslaved whole captured populations regardless of their genetic diversity.


The only contexts where inbreeding mattered were elite family lines trying to preserve property (e.g., Roman or Egyptian dynasties), not the treatment of conquered peoples.


So, to the extent there was any enslavement of Britons, it was because Rome conquered them, not because of any biological or genetic characteristic.

---

i didn't use chatgpt for this btw. i only have really good memory
 
nawtsi said:
Yeah im cherry picking but still, the makeup and filters these girls use are just excessive bruh
View attachment 200813
like cmon brah none of them look like this irl
this doesnt just apply to only black women tho plently of these instagram models fraud no matter what race i think ur just an idiot if youre attracted to these filter infested faces
Click to expand...
They are extra feminine so they need very high test men like me to satisfy their needs
 
vespertine said:

1. “How inbred Anglos are compared to other populations”​


Genetic studies of modern English (and broader Anglo) populations show low levels of inbreeding by historical standards.


  • Pre-industrial rural isolation: Before mass transportation, small communities everywhere (not just in England) had higher “runs of homozygosity,” i.e., more genetic similarity, because people tended to marry within a few miles. That wasn’t unique to “Anglos.”
  • Modern England: Genome-wide data (e.g., UK Biobank studies) show that inbreeding coefficients in modern Britons are among the lowest recorded, comparable to other large, urbanized European populations.
  • Comparison: Some isolated mountain or island populations (e.g., in the Caucasus or Iceland) show higher endogamy; England, by contrast, has had constant migration — Celts, Romans, Saxons, Vikings, Normans, later global influxes — which diluted any inbreeding.

In short: “Anglos” are one of the least inbred populations in Europe today, and probably have been for centuries.

2. “To what extent were the peoples of England Roman slaves?”​


Only marginally and briefly.


  • When Rome invaded Britain in 43 CE, they conquered southern and central Britain. Some native Britons were enslaved and exported to the continent — the Roman economy was slave-heavy.
  • But most Britons were not individually enslaved; they became provincial subjects under Roman rule, paying taxes and serving in the army.
  • The Roman system was not based on ethnically targeted slavery — it was pragmatic and opportunistic. Romans enslaved whoever they conquered, from Gauls to Greeks to Syrians.
  • After the Roman withdrawal (~410 CE), Britain was no longer under Roman control. By that time, the Anglo-Saxon ancestors of “Anglos” hadn’t even arrived yet — they came from northern Germany and Denmark in the 5th–6th centuries.

So: the ancestors of “Anglos” were never Roman slaves, and the Britons who were enslaved under Rome weren’t enslaved for being “inbred.”


3. “Was inbreeding the reason for any slavery imposed on them?”​


No, that idea is historically incoherent.


Slavery in the Roman world was a matter of conquest, debt, or birth, not genetics.
Romans didn’t even have a concept of “inbreeding” as a social marker; they enslaved whole captured populations regardless of their genetic diversity.


The only contexts where inbreeding mattered were elite family lines trying to preserve property (e.g., Roman or Egyptian dynasties), not the treatment of conquered peoples.


So, to the extent there was any enslavement of Britons, it was because Rome conquered them, not because of any biological or genetic characteristic.

---

i didn't use chatgpt for this btw. i only have really good memory
Click to expand...
Dnr does not fit my agenda
 
vespertine said:

1. “How inbred Anglos are compared to other populations”​


Genetic studies of modern English (and broader Anglo) populations show low levels of inbreeding by historical standards.


  • Pre-industrial rural isolation: Before mass transportation, small communities everywhere (not just in England) had higher “runs of homozygosity,” i.e., more genetic similarity, because people tended to marry within a few miles. That wasn’t unique to “Anglos.”
  • Modern England: Genome-wide data (e.g., UK Biobank studies) show that inbreeding coefficients in modern Britons are among the lowest recorded, comparable to other large, urbanized European populations.
  • Comparison: Some isolated mountain or island populations (e.g., in the Caucasus or Iceland) show higher endogamy; England, by contrast, has had constant migration — Celts, Romans, Saxons, Vikings, Normans, later global influxes — which diluted any inbreeding.

In short: “Anglos” are one of the least inbred populations in Europe today, and probably have been for centuries.

2. “To what extent were the peoples of England Roman slaves?”​


Only marginally and briefly.


  • When Rome invaded Britain in 43 CE, they conquered southern and central Britain. Some native Britons were enslaved and exported to the continent — the Roman economy was slave-heavy.
  • But most Britons were not individually enslaved; they became provincial subjects under Roman rule, paying taxes and serving in the army.
  • The Roman system was not based on ethnically targeted slavery — it was pragmatic and opportunistic. Romans enslaved whoever they conquered, from Gauls to Greeks to Syrians.
  • After the Roman withdrawal (~410 CE), Britain was no longer under Roman control. By that time, the Anglo-Saxon ancestors of “Anglos” hadn’t even arrived yet — they came from northern Germany and Denmark in the 5th–6th centuries.

So: the ancestors of “Anglos” were never Roman slaves, and the Britons who were enslaved under Rome weren’t enslaved for being “inbred.”


3. “Was inbreeding the reason for any slavery imposed on them?”​


No, that idea is historically incoherent.


Slavery in the Roman world was a matter of conquest, debt, or birth, not genetics.
Romans didn’t even have a concept of “inbreeding” as a social marker; they enslaved whole captured populations regardless of their genetic diversity.


The only contexts where inbreeding mattered were elite family lines trying to preserve property (e.g., Roman or Egyptian dynasties), not the treatment of conquered peoples.


So, to the extent there was any enslavement of Britons, it was because Rome conquered them, not because of any biological or genetic characteristic.

---

i didn't use chatgpt for this btw. i only have really good memory
Click to expand...
But wait AI is wrong on two things i see
 
nawtsi said:
These girls are beautiful
I realised i meant more like american ig model black girls, like the ones you see on baddies etc, those ones are truly insufferable and ugly
Click to expand...
"Heyyyyyy Bitch heyyy gurl that's my maaaannnnn omgggg"
 
nawtsi said:
These girls are beautiful
I realised i meant more like american ig model black girls, like the ones you see on baddies etc, those ones are truly insufferable and ugly
Click to expand...
All ig models are ugly as fuck honestly anyone who's attracted to them are walking red flags
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (Looksmaxxers: 0, Guests: 2)
Back
Top