- Joined
- Jul 22, 2024
- Messages
- 1,111
- Time Online
- 1d 6h
- Reputation
- 4,392
This is a morph of literally
50 chads
As you can see it looks exactly fucking like him
He has 100% harmony
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s 98-99Yeah his front mogs, what is it like 95%+?
He only has one t3+ and that’s his medial canthus alignmentYeah his front mogs, what is it like 95%+?
You're such a r****d highest harmony is definitely no higher than 95It’s 98-99
The deviation between his ipsilateral alar angle and jaw frontal seems to be higher but in my opinion I like it when the jaw angle is more obtuseHe only has one t3+ and that’s his medial canthus alignment
Here’s the thingThe deviation between his ipsilateral alar angle and jaw frontal seems to be higher but in my opinion I like it when the jaw angle is more obtuse
Damn didn’t know that it looks good thoughHere’s the thing
A deviation of about 10° is perfectly ideal for men
The morph of literally 50 chads has a 80° IAA and 90° JFA
Cruise has that exactly
View attachment 198192View attachment 198193
View attachment 198194View attachment 198195
You have no idea how harmony is calculated or what it is even so what position are you in to tell me how it worksYou're such a r****d highest harmony is definitely no higher than 95
Pretty boys and females have much less deviationDamn didn’t know that it looks good though
Once again you're a r****dYou have no idea how harmony is calculated or what it is even so what position are you in to tell me how it works
There are people with 95+ harmony that aren’t even close to chad
Why are you even here lol your iq is like 90Once again you're a r****d
Ok let me explain I'm not gonna argue too hard because your mind is made up. Even if I came with maths in hand to debunk this, you'd still disagree because there are too many rating systems for harmony and different ideals. Facial harmony is virtually meaningless as a way to base ratings off of anyway, mainly because of people like youWhy are you even here lol your iq is like 90
Dnr sorryOk let me explain I'm not gonna argue too hard because your mind is made up. Even if I came with maths in hand to debunk this, you'd still disagree because there are too many rating systems for harmony and different ideals. Facial harmony is virtually meaningless as a way to base ratings off of anyway. Mainly because of people like you
But saar you are 90 iq saar I iq mog you!Dnr sorry
You're such a r****d
@over0t1 fwhr
t1 esr
t1 ear
t1 nose : bizygo
t1 bigonial
t1 ocd
t1 icd
t1 thirds
t2 tfwhr
t1 ctp
t1 ct
t1 pfl : bizygo
t1 jfa
t1 iaa
t1 iaa : jfa
t1 eme
t4 mca
t1 brow tilt
t1 bitemporal
t2 bitemporal : bigonial
t1 forehead width
t1 mouth nose
t1 lower upper lip
t1 cheekbone set
t1 eyebrow set
t1 mouth : bigonial
t1 lower third prop.
t1 eyebrow spacing
t1 malar prominence
t1 fwhr
t1 esr
t1 ear
t1 nose : bizygo
t2 bigonial
t1 ocd
t1 icd
t1 jwhr
t1 nwhr
t1 thirds
t2 tfwhr
t1 mouth : chin
t1 ctp
t1 ct
t1 pfl : bizygo
t1 jfa
t1 iaa
t1 iaa : jfa
t1 eme
t4 mca
t1 brow tilt
t1 bitemporal
t2 bitemporal : bigonial
t1 forehead width
t1 mouth nose
t1 lower upper lip
t1 cheekbone set
t1 eyebrow set
t1 mouth : bigonial
t1 lower third prop.
t1 eyebrow spacing
t1 malar prominence
Erm saar I dnr your whole paragraph about how harmony is shit and well never agree but analyse now saar. r****d
It is a superficial calculation. Graphic images are about as superficial as you can get. These AB pixel distances can change substantially at the flick of an angle. So? You’re looking at pixels. You’re looking at something superficially. You can subconsciously recognize these superficial distances as soon as you see these pixels. You’ll know if you’re looking at an ugly person or a hot person, harmonious or unharmonious, angular or not angular Etc, you can still calculate this, it’s not entirely impractical. Keep barkingErm saar I dnr your whole paragraph about how harmony is shit and well never agree but analyse now saar. r****d
I don't think you even read it still. If you did you're just very dumb and have 0 comprehension skillsIt is a superficial calculation. Graphic images are about as superficial as you can get. These AB pixel distances can change substantially at the flick of an angle. So? You’re looking at pixels. You’re looking at something superficially. You can subconsciously recognize these superficial distances as soon as you see these pixels. You’ll know if you’re looking at an ugly person or a hot person, harmonious or unharmonious, angular or not angular Etc, you can still calculate this, it’s not entirely impractical. Keep barking
Trust me I read it all son. Dw you’ll get where I am one dayI don't think you even read it still. If you did you're just very dumb and have 0 comprehension skills
Cuz he’s uglyWhy is this n***a shitting on Tom Cruise to begin with![]()
Looks like we’d be relatedView attachment 198179View attachment 198180
This is a morph of literally
50 chads
As you can see it looks exactly fucking like him
He has 100% harmony
View attachment 198181View attachment 198182
let's stay outside of the massive argument above us AuggyWhy is this n***a shitting on Tom Cruise to begin with![]()
Bro… you can’t be seriousCuz he’s ugly
Clearly. This n***a spends too much time on forumslet's stay outside of the massive argument above us Auggy![]()
I’m very serious he looks like a snaggletooth hillbillyBro… you can’t be serious
Yeah yeah broI’m very serious he looks like a snaggletooth hillbilly
You joined 7 months after me and you have 24 times the browsing time. Idk what to say about thisClearly. This n***a spends too much time on forums
Hahaha Tom Cruise is ugly bro. Yeah yeahYou joined 7 months after me and you have 24 times the browsing time. Idk what to say about this
Yeah I spend too much time on forums broHahaha Tom Cruise is ugly bro. Yeah yeah
Tom Cruise is ugly broYeah I spend too much time on forums bro
View attachment 198209