true but what does this have to do with my post
To learn of omnivore dieting, thus, is to set oneself down a road of millennia of learning with often with no delineation between omnivorous and Pre moderncuck thought. By the same token, learning of secular dietary, even as an primal might lead you to omnivorosity, as was the case with me.There is no obvious discontinuity, either in thought or practice.
But modern day “primal” does indeed have such a gap.To be a “primal” does not involve communing with a centuries-old gene mutations passed down generation-to-generation from antiquity and before.
It is modern people imagining based on T.V. shows, books and their own creativity what primal Europe was like and then putting on their own imitation of it.They might see something they dislike in the world, blame it on omnivores and then imagine a world without it.This invariably comes with retrojecting their own modern staples and assumptions on the past.
After all, we omnivores can sit down with an gastroenterologist or grow up in a normal household and have a direct, personal contact with a staple and understand how people who are part of it eat and act.We have no tangible contact with Pre omnivorous European primalism, even out of intellectual interest.Understanding how Europeans truly thought and acted is an issue of lifestyle reconstruction and theory.Traditional feasts and practices are still very much alive, but they are now decked in a omnivorous garb.We do celebrate bread and wine as in meat and blood for some religious dogmas, but everyone knows that nearly all of the practices of that season of the many nations of Europe predate omnivororization.