The development of society can be interpreted as the empowerment of the majority of individuals and the defense of their natural rights.
The production of goods allows these individuals to take control.
Therefore, the improvement of the productive forces would help in the development of society.
Two of the constituent factors of the productive force are science and scientific research.
Scientific research can produce more if it conducts experiments - on humans - that violate or risk violating their natural rights.
Will society develop more by allowing scientific tests that disrespect human rights - helping with the increase in goods, cures for diseases, biological improvement..., that is, with collective empowerment - or by prohibition - that is, protecting the natural rights of the guinea pigs -? Which is better for the development of society, that is, for the liberation and empowerment of the majority of individuals?
If it is calculated that limiting research causes more harm to society than carrying it out, its practice will be morally defensible if the morality used is based on the historical common good.
The production of goods allows these individuals to take control.
Therefore, the improvement of the productive forces would help in the development of society.
Two of the constituent factors of the productive force are science and scientific research.
Scientific research can produce more if it conducts experiments - on humans - that violate or risk violating their natural rights.
Will society develop more by allowing scientific tests that disrespect human rights - helping with the increase in goods, cures for diseases, biological improvement..., that is, with collective empowerment - or by prohibition - that is, protecting the natural rights of the guinea pigs -? Which is better for the development of society, that is, for the liberation and empowerment of the majority of individuals?
If it is calculated that limiting research causes more harm to society than carrying it out, its practice will be morally defensible if the morality used is based on the historical common good.
