Join 70,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Liberalism is not progressive

theRetard

Well-known member
Banned
Reputable ★★
Established ★
Joined
Oct 25, 2025
Messages
2,887
Time Online
13d 7h
Reputation
9,449
Location
Russia
notice how they call egalitarianism, inclusiveness, and socialism - progressivism. the most retarded and backward, lower inferior species (bacteria, plants, etc.) have exactly the same societies. they're extremely conservative
the actual progressivism is aristocratic republic where the most virtue white males rule
 
Register to hide this ad
notice how they call egalitarianism, inclusiveness, and socialism - progressivism. the most retarded and backward, lower inferior species (bacteria, plants, etc.) have exactly the same societies. they're extremely conservative
the actual progressivism is aristocratic republic where the most virtue white males rule
Asians are also high IQ
But your intelligence is based in ur background not race
a black man with good background/education can be smartee than a white dude with a shit one
ofc this is water
 
communism and anything like that is for scum
 
anything left wing is just fucking disgusting, unless its a foid with left wing views then idc
 
Asians are also high IQ
But your intelligence is based in ur background not race
a black man with good
east asians are the 2nd most progressive race after whites. still worse than whites but they are civilized
n*****s have intelligence in potency but very low. ofc there can be a black with high iq but it's rarer than it is in whites
 
Well there is some part of the book that talks about virtue and power
Those in power aren’t virtuous
it depends on the state organization, aristocracy is the rule of few virtuous people while oligarchy is the opposite, same comes to monarchy/tyranny dichotomy
 
it depends on the state organization, aristocracy is the rule of few virtuous people while oligarchy is the opposite, same comes to monarchy/tyranny dichotomy
Do you think any country that exists today is ruled by “ aristocracy “
 
it always leads to tyranny/totalitarianism even tho left ideologies (include communism) are supposed to be democratic lol
yeah its corrupt
 
I don’t see their people complaining they actually like them the vast majority support the ruling families and think that they are the best fit for this position which is exactly aristocratic
arab countries are despotic and if there was some ruling family other than the monarch then he'd purge them lol
 
arab countries are despotic and if there was some ruling family other than the monarch then he'd purge them lol
I think a ruling family is the best way of rule
Kids are being trained for this position since a very young age and there is some sort of a competition in the family between who’s gonna take the rule and they are from the same land and the same people they rule not a random n***a from a random country who is named under a nationality and now he’s suddenly running for presidency and take the votes of random retards
 
I think a ruling family is the best way of rule
Kids are being trained for this position since a very young age and there is some sort of a competition in the family between who’s gonna take the rule and they are from the same land and the same people they rule not a random n***a from a random country who is named under a nationality and now he’s suddenly running for presidency and take the votes of random retards
i agree with you but arab countries aren't like this
 
notice how they call egalitarianism, inclusiveness, and socialism - progressivism. the most retarded and backward, lower inferior species (bacteria, plants, etc.) have exactly the same societies. they're extremely conservative
the actual progressivism is aristocratic republic where the most virtue white males rule
 
the actual progressivism is aristocratic republic where the most virtue white males rule
This is a contradiction, is it not?
notice how they call egalitarianism, inclusiveness, and socialism - progressivism. the most retarded and backward, lower inferior species (bacteria, plants, etc.) have exactly the same societies. they're extremely conservative
This too.
 
notice how they call egalitarianism, inclusiveness, and socialism - progressivism. the most retarded and backward, lower inferior species (bacteria, plants, etc.) have exactly the same societies. they're extremely conservative
the actual progressivism is aristocratic republic where the most virtue white males rule
agree completely, these societies reject any opinion opposed to their own, which is why they’ll always be stuck in these inferior underdeveloped positions
 
what exactly?
You said that "real" progressivism would be an "aristocratic republic". First, the word "aristocratic republic" is an oxymoron. Second, whether you like it or not that is not progressivism, no matter how much you want to co-opt that word, it strictly refers to leftism.
 
agree completely, these societies reject any opinion opposed to their own, which is why they’ll always be stuck in these inferior underdeveloped positions
Because western, liberal, democracies are known for being in "inferior underdeveloped positions". The only societies that "reject any opinion opposed to their own" are authoritarian and non-egalitarian ones, like North Korea. Western democracies have been constantly changing and evolving through nonviolent means since the 1700s, which should be a testament to how wrong this is.
 
You said that "real" progressivism would be an "aristocratic republic". First, the word "aristocratic republic" is an oxymoron. Second, whether you like it or not that is not progressivism, no matter how much you want to co-opt that word, it strictly refers to leftism.
aristocratic republic is an oxymoron? why? republican institutes should serve to aristocratic class in the first place cuz republic is just governance in the interests of the common good, aristocrats know better what the majority needs because aristocracy is the rule of the best
it is not progressive? i just explained why it is progressive and liberals/commies are backwards retards. read the thread.
Because western, liberal, democracies are known for being in "inferior underdeveloped positions". The only societies that "reject any opinion opposed to their own" are authoritarian and non-egalitarian ones, like North Korea. Western democracies have been constantly changing and evolving through nonviolent means since the 1700s, which should be a testament to how wrong this is.
north korea is egalitarian society (they are literally commies).
on authoritarianism, why do you think that it is worse than democracy? it is the golden mean between bad things (totalitaniamism and democracy). totalitarianism usually comes from democracy because in democracy many retards rule so they choose some demagogue lol.
liberalism is a shitty ideology too because says that there must be freedom of speech (so basically even the most retarded idiots are able to say something which is wrong) and tolerant (tolerance is evil, cuz leads to spreading non-tolerant ideas)
 
Last edited:
aristocratic republic is an oxymoron? why? republican institutes should serve to aristocratic class in the first place cuz republic is just governance in the interests of the common good, aristocrats know better what the majority needs because aristocracy is the rule of the best
it is not progressive? i just explained why it is progressive and liberals/commies are backwards retards. read the thread.
No, aristocracy is not the "rule of the best" in the "interests of the common good", saying those things does not make thm true. This is the same logic every authoritarian uses and it never works. The leadership of Nazi Germany, the USSR, and North Korea also believe they were acting "interests of the common good" and were "the best" for the job, but it turns out they were wrong about a lot of things. You are living in a fantasy world, you believe if you give the right people all the power everything will work out. That's not progressive, progressive doesn't just mean whatever you think is good and will advance society. Progressivism is a specific sat of ideas that revolve around egalitarianism, something you seem to hate.
north korea is egalitarian society (they are literally commies).
No, they aren't, they are an aristocracy just like you want to live in. North Korea is literally operated as an oligarchy, Kim Jung Un is only dictator because his father was. "Egalitarianism" is not just communism, it is far more complex than that.
totalitarianism usually comes from democracy because in democracy many retards rule so they choose some demagogue lol.
So instead of many "retards" you want there to be one r****d, or a small cabal of "retards"? How is this any better? Also stop using the word r****d. I know you may think you are smarter and more correct than everybody else, but you aren't, and this thought process is incredibly common. This elitism is something I've noticed that underpins every single authoritarian, this idea that their ideology and belief system is just somehow better than everyone else, and they have somehow figured everything out, and if you just listen to them eveyrhting will be just fine (it won't, millions will die).
liberalism is a shitty ideology too because says that there must be freedom of speech (so basically even the most retarded idiots are able to say something which is wrong) and tolerant (tolerance is evil, cuz leads to spreading non-tolerant ideas)
First, liberalism is the most economically and geopolitically successful ideology in history. Second, just because you think someone is wrong doesn't mean they actually are, this is why free speech is so important. A society without free speech is essentially just a society in which a randomly selected set of values which are endorsed by the government are allowed, and all opposing views are cracked down upon, that isn't productive because it just leads to an echochamber where the "retards" who just so happen to be in charge go unchecked.
 
No, aristocracy is not the "rule of the best" in the "interests of the common good", saying those things does not make thm true. This is the same logic every authoritarian uses and it never works. The leadership of Nazi Germany, the USSR, and North Korea also believe they were acting "interests of the common good" and were "the best" for the job, but it turns out they were wrong about a lot of things. You are living in a fantasy world, you believe if you give the right people all the power everything will work out. That's not progressive, progressive doesn't just mean whatever you think is good and will advance society. Progressivism is a specific sat of ideas that revolve around egalitarianism, something you seem to hate.
you don't know what aristocracy is. go and check the definition. JFL at you.
The leadership of nazi germany and ussr WERE NOT authoritatian, they were totalitarian and they didn't give a fuck about interests of common good cuz they were literally tyrannical regimes so not for the common good but for the good of one single person.
i don't even know why should i explain such basic things.
Progressivism is not about egalitarianism, egalitarianism is in the most retarded species like plants and microbes, humans aren't equal at all
No, they aren't, they are an aristocracy just like you want to live in. North Korea is literally operated as an oligarchy, Kim Jung Un is only dictator because his father was. "Egalitarianism" is not just communism, it is far more complex than that.
>north korea is aristocratic SAAAR they are aristocratic SAAR (they are dictatorships in reality)
so why do you dislike north korea, soviet union and nazi germany? as a leftoid, shouldn't you love them? cuz it's literally what leftoids want.
And yeah nazi germany is a leftoid regime,calling them far right is commie propaganda
So instead of many "retards" you want there to be one r****d, or a small cabal of "retards"? How is this any better? Also stop using the word r****d. I know you may think you are smarter and more correct than everybody else, but you aren't, and this thought process is incredibly common. This elitism is something I've noticed that underpins every single authoritarian, this idea that their ideology and belief system is just somehow better than everyone else, and they have somehow figured everything out, and if you just listen to them eveyrhting will be just fine (it won't, millions will die).
"you aren't smarter sir, but ofc i'm smarter then you even tho i don't know what aristocracy is"
Most totalitarian regimes (exaclty totalitarian, not authtoritarian) are very egalitarian and appeal to equality, look at commie union, mao's china, north korea, nazi germany etc. Elitism mogs them to shit
First, liberalism is the most economically and geopolitically successful ideology in history. Second, just because you think someone is wrong doesn't mean they actually are, this is why free speech is so important. A society without free speech is essentially just a society in which a randomly selected set of values which are endorsed by the government are allowed, and all opposing views are cracked down upon, that isn't productive because it just leads to an echochamber where the "retards" who just so happen to be in charge go unchecked.
geopolitics is pseudoscience and liberalism even if it is economically successful, is this because of liberalism, or because of free market lol, there's many ideologies except liberalism that postulate free market as a valuable thing. Is free speech important? yeah it's basic thing so you can debate, but it shoudn't be absolute cuz if it is absolute then there will be retarded ideas spread that will destroy freedom of speech.
 
okay i get your point but i never understood comparing humans and human civilization to non-human things.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top