Deleted member 62166
I'm better.
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2025
- Messages
- 41
- Reputation
- 83
I kid you not. ALMOST EVERY SINGLE normie dude I see with a girl has tattoos.
Whether 19, 24, 33 or 40+, if you don't have a tattoo as a dude it's over.
Almost at least. Meaning in most cases having no tattoos = virgin truecel sign.
Men in 2025 NEED TATTOOS. You gotta look like a thug ahh n***a.
Without those marks of the beast you appear LESS NT. More white bread.
You appear UNCOOL and OUT OF SOCIAL TOUCH/"CODE OF THE GAME."
You appear OLD and GENERALLY UNDESIRABLE (like you're some cringe ahh dad).
Men here can cope all they want but pussy getters are 99% tathavers.
Why? ETHNIC LAW. Tattoos make you look like a Mexican gang member. Or a jailnigga.
You have to be ethnicmaxxed. Black men are GigaChad by default due to NT, fashion, tats, alpha shit.
A punk n***a. A hardass. HyperNT. Fashionable. Approachable. Up to date.
If you're a dude n***a with ZERO TATS in 2025 ... Better be a fucking Chad then.
Most men without tats look like fucking ND nerds who're forever unfuckables.
Seriously NAME ME ONE AVERAGE NORMIE DUDE PULLING WITHOUT TATS/STYLE/POPULARITY.
I SERIOUSLY ASK OF YOU TO SHOW ME. NONE EXIST.
Tats, piercings, dark skin, n***a disposition, hyperNTness, style, aura, etc.
Having no tats/piercings/NTstyle or ethnicappeal makes you INVISIBLE as a norman.
What kind of sex appeal do skinned cat normcunts with average looks have?
NONE. Only Chads can get girls being plain as an unfrosted cake. That's it. It is what it is.
Normie dudes/sub 7 dudes NEED some style, NT, chains, tats, what have you.
Point is they NEED SOMETHING. They will never "slay" on looks alone.
They need to look like a n****r & act like a n****r through & through.
If you act "too white" & look "too white" you will be incel for certain.
Whether 19, 24, 33 or 40+, if you don't have a tattoo as a dude it's over.
Almost at least. Meaning in most cases having no tattoos = virgin truecel sign.
Men in 2025 NEED TATTOOS. You gotta look like a thug ahh n***a.
Without those marks of the beast you appear LESS NT. More white bread.
You appear UNCOOL and OUT OF SOCIAL TOUCH/"CODE OF THE GAME."
You appear OLD and GENERALLY UNDESIRABLE (like you're some cringe ahh dad).
Men here can cope all they want but pussy getters are 99% tathavers.
Why? ETHNIC LAW. Tattoos make you look like a Mexican gang member. Or a jailnigga.
You have to be ethnicmaxxed. Black men are GigaChad by default due to NT, fashion, tats, alpha shit.
A punk n***a. A hardass. HyperNT. Fashionable. Approachable. Up to date.
If you're a dude n***a with ZERO TATS in 2025 ... Better be a fucking Chad then.
Most men without tats look like fucking ND nerds who're forever unfuckables.
Seriously NAME ME ONE AVERAGE NORMIE DUDE PULLING WITHOUT TATS/STYLE/POPULARITY.
I SERIOUSLY ASK OF YOU TO SHOW ME. NONE EXIST.
Tats, piercings, dark skin, n***a disposition, hyperNTness, style, aura, etc.
Having no tats/piercings/NTstyle or ethnicappeal makes you INVISIBLE as a norman.
What kind of sex appeal do skinned cat normcunts with average looks have?
NONE. Only Chads can get girls being plain as an unfrosted cake. That's it. It is what it is.
Normie dudes/sub 7 dudes NEED some style, NT, chains, tats, what have you.
Point is they NEED SOMETHING. They will never "slay" on looks alone.
They need to look like a n****r & act like a n****r through & through.
If you act "too white" & look "too white" you will be incel for certain.
Last edited: