Join 58,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Info mostly men appear to be incels and not women

Ekte Eva

Well known agarthian foid
Reputable
Established
Joined
Aug 18, 2025
Messages
1,574
Time Online
3d 1h
Reputation
3,097
Location
Norway
Men often appear harsher toward women because of evolutionary and social dynamics, not just personal choice. Historically, men have been more competitive and aggressive in general, especially in relation to mating and status. Women or "foids" like me, being the “gatekeepers” of reproduction, trigger stronger reactions: judgment, resentment, admiration, or hostility.

Women carry the biological power of reproduction, which made their choices and behaviors extremely impactful for men’s survival chances. That pressure wired men to react strongly, whether through protection, control, or aggression.

Men evolved to compete with each other for status, resources, and mates. When women reject them or favor higher-status men, it taps into the same circuits that make men ruthless in male–male competition.

Societies often held women to stricter standards (purity, beauty, loyalty) because men feared betrayal or “wasting” investment. That created long traditions of men policing and criticizing women more than the reverse.

So the harshness is not random cruelty. It’s the byproduct of deep biological drives and social systems. the pattern has roots in male psychology and evolutionary history.

Women CAN also be femcels. Many women struggle with loneliness, but they don't talk about it as much as all the men does. A

This is my thoughts and if you don't agree you are wrong.
 
Register to hide this ad
Men often appear harsher toward women because of evolutionary and social dynamics, not just personal choice. Historically, men have been more competitive and aggressive in general, especially in relation to mating and status. Women or "foids" like me, being the “gatekeepers” of reproduction, trigger stronger reactions: judgment, resentment, admiration, or hostility.

Women carry the biological power of reproduction, which made their choices and behaviors extremely impactful for men’s survival chances. That pressure wired men to react strongly, whether through protection, control, or aggression.

Men evolved to compete with each other for status, resources, and mates. When women reject them or favor higher-status men, it taps into the same circuits that make men ruthless in male–male competition.

Societies often held women to stricter standards (purity, beauty, loyalty) because men feared betrayal or “wasting” investment. That created long traditions of men policing and criticizing women more than the reverse.

So the harshness is not random cruelty. It’s the byproduct of deep biological drives and social systems. the pattern has roots in male psychology and evolutionary history.

Women CAN also be femcels. Many women struggle with loneliness, but they don't talk about it as much as all the men does. A

This is my thoughts and if you don't agree you are wrong.
I ain't reading allat
 
Men often appear harsher toward women because of evolutionary and social dynamics, not just personal choice. Historically, men have been more competitive and aggressive in general, especially in relation to mating and status. Women or "foids" like me, being the “gatekeepers” of reproduction, trigger stronger reactions: judgment, resentment, admiration, or hostility.

Women carry the biological power of reproduction, which made their choices and behaviors extremely impactful for men’s survival chances. That pressure wired men to react strongly, whether through protection, control, or aggression.

Men evolved to compete with each other for status, resources, and mates. When women reject them or favor higher-status men, it taps into the same circuits that make men ruthless in male–male competition.

Societies often held women to stricter standards (purity, beauty, loyalty) because men feared betrayal or “wasting” investment. That created long traditions of men policing and criticizing women more than the reverse.

So the harshness is not random cruelty. It’s the byproduct of deep biological drives and social systems. the pattern has roots in male psychology and evolutionary history.

Women CAN also be femcels. Many women struggle with loneliness, but they don't talk about it as much as all the men does. A

This is my thoughts and if you don't agree you are wrong.
yes femcels are very possible tbh, idk why people treat like it isn’t.
I’m almost 16 and have never kissed I wouldn’t say i’m female I’m too young but maybe I’m on the way to be one
 
Men often appear harsher toward women because of evolutionary and social dynamics, not just personal choice. Historically, men have been more competitive and aggressive in general, especially in relation to mating and status. Women or "foids" like me, being the “gatekeepers” of reproduction, trigger stronger reactions: judgment, resentment, admiration, or hostility.

Women carry the biological power of reproduction, which made their choices and behaviors extremely impactful for men’s survival chances. That pressure wired men to react strongly, whether through protection, control, or aggression.

Men evolved to compete with each other for status, resources, and mates. When women reject them or favor higher-status men, it taps into the same circuits that make men ruthless in male–male competition.

Societies often held women to stricter standards (purity, beauty, loyalty) because men feared betrayal or “wasting” investment. That created long traditions of men policing and criticizing women more than the reverse.

So the harshness is not random cruelty. It’s the byproduct of deep biological drives and social systems. the pattern has roots in male psychology and evolutionary history.

Women CAN also be femcels. Many women struggle with loneliness, but they don't talk about it as much as all the men does. A

This is my thoughts and if you don't agree you are wrong.
Blackpillirony here ! Women cant be incels. Blackpillirony gone.
 
Women can't be incels but they can be femcels😉
"Femcels" is not the female equivalent to incel. Femcel either describes a misandrist attitude or women that are frustrated from last romantic experiences, therefore not incels. Over
 
"Femcels" is not the female equivalent to incel. Femcel either describes a misandrist attitude or women that are frustrated from last romantic experiences, therefore not incels. Over
Reacting with the clown emoji instead of arguing is peak anti-intellectualism
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top