🎄 Join 58,000+ Looksmaxxing Members! 🎄

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

muh harmony and ratios

milkjar

Well-known member
Reputable ★★★
Established ★★★
Joined
Aug 14, 2025
Messages
13,189
Solutions
7
Time Online
1mo 12d
Reputation
36,480
these literally mean nothing btw 😂 jfl I always see ltns arguing about who mogs cause one of them has slightly better muh ratios, n***a this means nothing it's still over for you, either you look good or you don't

muh saaar b-but it says I have ideal fwhr saaar

saaar Hindus on .org said I have 90% harmony saaar
 
Register to hide this ad
Couldn't agree any more. It's all bones and coloring and health indicators and features, leanness, etc. Ian somerhalder has 50 range harmony
 
these literally mean nothing btw 😂 jfl I always see ltns arguing about who mogs cause one of them has slightly better muh ratios, n***a this means nothing it's still over for you, either you look good or you don't

muh saaar b-but it says I have ideal fwhr saaar

saaar Hindus on .org said I have 90% harmony saaar
Blud you have 90% harmony 😲
 
Blud you have 90% harmony 😲
I remember measuring my facial ratios and most of them weren't bad, but I still consider my self LTN they literally don't mean anything jfl
 
I remember measuring my facial ratios and most of them weren't bad, but I still consider my self LTN they literally don't mean anything jfl
Yeah most rating methods aren’t science based and are made from 13 year old Indians
 
Yeah most rating methods aren’t science based and are made from 13 year old Indians
even when science based it's still cope, you look good or you don't, a mtn can have better ratios than a htn
 
these literally mean nothing btw 😂 jfl I always see ltns arguing about who mogs cause one of them has slightly better muh ratios, n***a this means nothing it's still over for you, either you look good or you don't

muh saaar b-but it says I have ideal fwhr saaar

saaar Hindus on .org said I have 90% harmony saaar
What? Ratios are the average on a face. People who are attractive or have good bone usually have good ratios too.

Matt Bomer
Chico
Jon Erik Hexum
Hernano Drago
etc

Ratios and bones are correlated between each other. Because ratios are taken from the most attractive people and taking the mean and given a range.

Are there exceptions? Yeah, but there's exception everywhere. There's still the averages
 
Last edited:
even when science based it's still cope, you look good or you don't, a mtn can have better ratios than a htn
You realize there's formulas? Right? They have a certain extent to how much they change looks.
Take the most basic one ratios/harmony only matter for 35% of all looks
 
even when science based it's still cope, you look good or you don't, a mtn can have better ratios than a htn
Well that’s cuz of stuff like dimorphism angularity etc
 
What? Ratios are the average on a face. People who are attractive or have good bone usually have good ratios too.

Matt Bomer
Chico
Jon Erik Hexum
Hernano Drago
etc

Ratios and bones are correlated between each other. Because ratios are taken from the most attractive people and taking the mean and given a range.

Are there exceptions? Yeah, but there's exception everywhere. There's still the averages
It's not just exceptions imo. You can have 90% harmony and very easily be mtn or ltn. Very easily. I'm not even saying extreme examples. Legit just mildly bad features and some bloat or bad health indicators and easy ltn.

Meanwhile somerhalder has 50 range harmony and is rated chad (many such cases)

90% harmony is good to have and it's definitely an advantage, and is better to have than having 60% harmony for instance, but it really only shows through when you have other things about your face that are good.
 
It's not just exceptions imo. You can have 90% harmony and very easily be mtn or ltn. Very easily. I'm not even saying extreme examples. Legit just mildly bad features and some bloat or bad health indicators and easy ltn.

Meanwhile somerhalder has 50 range harmony and is rated chad (many such cases)

90% harmony is good to have and it's definitely an advantage, and is better to have than having 60% harmony for instance, but it really only shows through when you have other things about your face that are good.
I’d say harmony is like 50 percent of looks
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top