• The blackpill is not a moral code or ideology. It is a way of describing how attractiveness and mate selection work statistically.
• People often attach emotional or moral narratives like “it’s over” or “real blackpillers help others ascend,” but those should not define the concept.
• Misogynistic and emotional takes online have made the word “blackpill” sound hateful, even though it can be used in a neutral, factual way.
• Attraction is personal. Culture and experience shape what people like.
• Still, there is a lot of agreement across people and cultures about what is conventionally attractive.
• Features like symmetry, balanced facial ratios, clear skin, and yuoth are rated higher on average.
• “Conventionally attractive” means appealing to most people, not everyone.
• Most people agree on what looks unattractive, even if they disagree on what looks the best.
• Breaking down social behavior or attraction into numbers feels unnatural to most people.
• They rely on instinct, not analysis, to read others.
• When someone starts quantifying beauty or hierarchy, it feels mechanical and takes away the “human” side of social life.
• People want to believe attraction and charisma are natural, not something predictable.
• People usually like what feels natural and familiar.
• Synthetic or engineered things like drugs, surgeries, or biohacking make them uneasy.
• Talking about specific doses or enhancements can trigger discomfort because it feels cold or unsafe, even when it isn’t.
• Women often prefer partners with higher status, stability, or resources. This likely developed from survival pressures like safety during pregnancy or raising children.
• Men usually care more about physical attraction and fertility cues than social status.
• As women gain financial independence, hypergamy shifts toward admiration for skill, ambition, or confidence instead of survival needs.
• People often link systemizing social behavior or attraction to traits associated with autism.
• Because of that, analyzing attraction can come off as cold or socially detached.
• This is why topics like blackpill or lkoosmaxxing make many people uncomfortable.
• Facial symmetry and averageness are linked to higher attractiveness (Rhodes et al., 1998; Thornhill & Gangestad, 1999).
• Downward or negative canthal tilt is rated as less attractive than a positive tilt (Burke et al., 2016).
• Recessed maxilla or weak chin correlates with lower aesthetic ratings in facial harmony (Mackay et al., 2019).
• Acne and visible skin issues cause social stigma and lower perceived attractiveness (Liu et al., 2020; Magin et al., 2006).
• Physical disability or visible difference is often linked to reduced romantic desirability due to societal bias (Shakespeare, 2014; Taleporos & McCabe, 2002).
Sources:
- Rhodes, G. et al. (1998). "Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research." Psychological Bulletin.
- Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. (1999). "Facial attractiveness and symmetry." Human Nature.
- Burke, P.H. et al. (2016). "A morphometric study of facial proportion and attractiveness." Journal of Craniofacial Surgery.
- Mackay, D.R. et al. (2019). "Facial harmony and skeletal aesthetics." Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.
- Liu, P.F. et al. (2020). "Acne, perceived stigma, and psychological health." Dermatology Reports.
- Magin, P. et al. (2006). "The psychological impact of acne." British Journal of Dermatology.
- Shakespeare, T. (2014). Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited.
- Taleporos, G., & McCabe, M.P. (2002). "Body image and physical disability." Sexuality and Disability.