Join 33,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Theory Something I've noticed about women and follower counts and their partners

Why do high follower HTB+ women have unattractive/average BFs, or no BF?

  • Nude images/OF creators

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    7

Jova

It's so jova
Reputable
Established
Joined
Apr 18, 2024
Messages
1,389
Reputation
3,099
Location
Southwest coast of Mexico
  • I wonder why many women think higher followers on ig or tt mean more access to Chad.
  • Despite this, I’ve seen A LOT (and I mean A LOT) of chads (both high and low follower counts) with women (MTB or higher, but mostly MTB-HTB) with low follower counts as LTRs and even wives.
  • Not all Chads are in LTRs with women with high follower counts (though some of course, are, especially if he's an influencer).
  • HOWEVER, MANY (not all) women with high follower counts (HTB+) are with men FAR below their looksmatch. ESPECIALLY if they have OF. Or alternatively, they have NO man attached to them at all (most likely escorting/yachting). INCLUDING bonafide Stacylites and Stacies. DESPITE HAVING EASY ACCESS TO CHAD. VERY EASY ACCESS, EVEN WITH CHADS FOLLOWING THEM.
  • Why?
 
extremely insecure. Chad didn't commit, he just want to smash.

LTN betabuxx her and accept all her bullshit, including recording when his OF girlfriend get plowed by two bulls "for the work"

His only shot at love
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #9
They care for what's in the inside
Who?
They date men less attractive than them to seem better and feel more secure that they won’t leave them for someone else more attractive
Some don’t date at all bc they don’t wanna be “ tied down “
Ironically it's not about how many followers the person has. It's about who they are as a person that matters. These women are riddled with anxious attachment issues from sleeping with too many people
It's likely the women who are in LTRs with chadlites/chads with higher followers than them (or even low follower chads!) have a secure or even secure leaning slightly dismissive-avoidant attachment style.
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #10
extremely insecure. Chad didn't commit, he just want to smash.

LTN betabuxx her and accept all her bullshit, including recording when his OF girlfriend get plowed by two bulls "for the work"

His only shot at love
STOP WITH THE "CHAD WON'T COMMIT" BULLSHIT. MANY ARE IN LTRS and ironically with women with lower followers than them, much lower (but not all chads). Please read the OP again.

See below:

Who?

Ironically it's not about how many followers the person has. It's about who they are as a person that matters. These women are riddled with anxious attachment issues from sleeping with too many people
It's likely the women who are in LTRs with chadlites/chads with higher followers than them (or even low follower chads!) have a secure or even secure leaning slightly dismissive-avoidant attachment style.
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #12
Yeah it really has nothing to do with followers

Yup, exactly why they don’t wanna be “ tied down “
ANXIOUS ATTACHMENT = too afraid to LTR a chad due to fears of him cheating on the woman (even if the man genuinely loves the woman with all his heart), and will constantly check his following list

DISMISSIVE AVOIDANT ATTACHMENT = doesn't want an LTR at all (either a sexless femcel deliberately waiting for a PSL chad, or an "independent woman")


most women are anxious attachment in 2024.
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #13
extremely insecure. Chad didn't commit, he just want to smash.

LTN betabuxx her and accept all her bullshit, including recording when his OF girlfriend get plowed by two bulls "for the work"

His only shot at love
ANXIOUS ATTACHMENT = too afraid to LTR a chad due to fears of him cheating on the woman (even if the man genuinely loves the woman with all his heart), and will constantly check his following list

DISMISSIVE AVOIDANT ATTACHMENT = doesn't want an LTR at all (either a sexless femcel, or an "independent woman")


most women are anxious attachment in 2024.
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #14
ANXIOUS ATTACHMENT = too afraid to LTR a chad due to fears of him cheating on the woman (even if the man genuinely loves the woman with all his heart), and will constantly check his following list

DISMISSIVE AVOIDANT ATTACHMENT = doesn't want an LTR at all (either a sexless femcel deliberately waiting for a PSL chad, or an "independent woman")


most women are anxious attachment in 2024.
@ifsixwasnine here's a more detailed post on attachment styles:

Summary of Prevalence Estimates:​

Attachment StyleGen Z White WomenGen X White Women
Anxious-Preoccupied40-50%25-30%
Dismissive-Avoidant15-20%20-25%
Secure20-25%35-40%
Fearful-Avoidant10-15%10%

Why This Shift?​

The prevalence of anxious-preoccupied attachment in Gen Z white women has surged due to a combination of factors, including the constant comparison triggered by social media, the instability of modern relationships, and the pressure of hypergamous ideals. The dating landscape for Gen Z is characterized by short-term, casual relationships and the prioritization of status and appearance, which fuels insecurity and the need for validation. As a result, anxious attachment has become much more common among this generation.

Meanwhile, dismissive-avoidant attachment is concentrated among specific groups, such as women in technical, intellectual, or socially isolated fields who tend to avoid emotional vulnerability and prioritize independence. While DA attachment has always existed in some form, its prevalence has shifted, with Gen X women focusing on independence during the rise of the feminist movement, and Gen Z women navigating a more fragmented and competitive dating world that discourages emotional closeness for some.

The decline in secure attachment among Gen Z is driven by the overall instability and unpredictability of modern relationships, as well as the impact of social media on self-esteem and relationship expectations.

Attachment Styles Among Gen Z Women of All Ethnicities

Attachment StyleWhiteEast AsianSouth AsianMENAHispanicAfrican AmericanOverall
Anxious-Preoccupied40-50%10-15%15-20%15-20%30-40%35-45%30-40%
Dismissive-Avoidant15-20%40-50%20-25%25-30%15-20%10-15%20-25%
Secure20-25%15-20%30-35%30-35%20-25%20-25%20-25%
Fearful-Avoidant10-15%10-15%5-10%5-10%10-15%10-15%10-15%
 
@ifsixwasnine here's a more detailed post on attachment styles:

Summary of Prevalence Estimates:​

Attachment StyleGen Z White WomenGen X White Women
Anxious-Preoccupied40-50%25-30%
Dismissive-Avoidant15-20%20-25%
Secure20-25%35-40%
Fearful-Avoidant10-15%10%

Why This Shift?​

The prevalence of anxious-preoccupied attachment in Gen Z white women has surged due to a combination of factors, including the constant comparison triggered by social media, the instability of modern relationships, and the pressure of hypergamous ideals. The dating landscape for Gen Z is characterized by short-term, casual relationships and the prioritization of status and appearance, which fuels insecurity and the need for validation. As a result, anxious attachment has become much more common among this generation.

Meanwhile, dismissive-avoidant attachment is concentrated among specific groups, such as women in technical, intellectual, or socially isolated fields who tend to avoid emotional vulnerability and prioritize independence. While DA attachment has always existed in some form, its prevalence has shifted, with Gen X women focusing on independence during the rise of the feminist movement, and Gen Z women navigating a more fragmented and competitive dating world that discourages emotional closeness for some.

The decline in secure attachment among Gen Z is driven by the overall instability and unpredictability of modern relationships, as well as the impact of social media on self-esteem and relationship expectations.

Attachment Styles Among Gen Z Women of All Ethnicities

Attachment StyleWhiteEast AsianSouth AsianMENAHispanicAfrican AmericanOverall
Anxious-Preoccupied40-50%10-15%15-20%15-20%30-40%35-45%30-40%
Dismissive-Avoidant15-20%40-50%20-25%25-30%15-20%10-15%20-25%
Secure20-25%15-20%30-35%30-35%20-25%20-25%20-25%
Fearful-Avoidant10-15%10-15%5-10%5-10%10-15%10-15%10-15%
do you think that social media and high follower count could affect their dopamine and make them insecure due to things like likes and stuff
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #20
The world is run by hurricanes
 

Similar threads


Back
Top