Join 60,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Serious Something that low-key blows my mind and makes me think we are in a simulation

Kage no Kage no Kaiba

#THEMILKISOUTOFTHEJAR Leader
Reputable ★★★
Established ★★★
Joined
Apr 29, 2024
Messages
14,056
Time Online
1mo 1d
Reputation
43,777
So the photon (particle of light) if you shine ur light onto something that gives it the opportunity of taking 2 paths such as a mirror it will take both at first

And that makes sense at first but did you know after u measure the most probable outcome it will exclusively take that one outcome??? Like the meer act of measuring which path is more likely leads it to take a single path and it gets even weirder btw

If u delay the measurement by a couple of minutes it will in the present take the path you will discover in the future

This shit is legit mind blowing if u think about it
 
Register to hide this ad
It is a very real prediction of the future btw even if not by a lot and just by the path light particles will take it’s still a prediction of the future as the light seems to be aware in a way that it’s being measured

It’s almost like the universe itself knows this is crazy bro
 
the measurement in the future doesn't decide what the photon does in the past, even if it looks like it. the formalism doesn’t say the photon secretly did one thing or the other before you checked. “which path did it take?” wasn’t even well-defined until you force it with a measurement
 
the measurement in the future doesn't decide what the photon does in the past, even if it looks like it. the formalism doesn’t say the photon secretly did one thing or the other before you checked. “which path did it take?” wasn’t even well-defined until you force it with a measurement
i hate myself
 
the measurement in the future doesn't decide what the photon does in the past, even if it looks like it. the formalism doesn’t say the photon secretly did one thing or the other before you checked. “which path did it take?” wasn’t even well-defined until you force it with a measurement
Tho apperantly if you don’t measure it at all it takes both paths. It only chooses a path once you measure the probability of which it would take

Almost like the universe itself knows it’s being observed

The prediction experiment is done by delaying the results by a couple of seconds to which even then it responds to what the results will be before they come out
 
over for measurecels
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top