Join 43,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Serious The hymen is actually a MYTH. It was invented by men as a coping mechanism.

Deleted member 62166

I'm better.
Joined
Feb 25, 2025
Messages
41
Reputation
83
This may shock or come across as humorous/trolling but it's 100% serious ... "Hymens" don't exist.

This was perpetuated by coping men in many years past ... A way to fulfill their fantasy of "virgin angels."

A way so men can pretend they know which women have had sex and which haven't, to judge them.

"No hymen, no diamond." "Cherry popping." It's all "virginial coping" by delusional men who pedestalize women; who value their sexual anatomy based on whether they believe it's "sealed & pure" or "used."

It's actual mental illness because it carries such deep connotations merely on account of arguable tissue.

It's essentially a hot debate in feminist circles, but even past the topical bullshit it's worth thinking about.

Truth is, there is no objectively, provable, irrefutable definition of what a "hymen" even practically is.

Much research surrounding it is just as dead-ended as plenty of other female anatomy research.

AKA in other words there's no perfect agreement physiologically as to what a "hymen" is.

There is no magical "seal" imbued in a female upon birth that designates her as "virgin."

The reality is a "hymen" is often a catch all word for VARIOUS symptomatic correlations...

Like vaginismus, labial fusion, etc. All of these together can PRESENT as the so-called "hymen."


But in reality there is no real "hymen." Some girls have nothing preventing entry to their vaginas...

That needs to be "broken" or such. It isn't consistently found. In reality, if something blocks the vagina...

It's probably subclinical vaginismus, a fused labia, vaginal stenosis, or some other development issue.

There is no "mark" of hymen in all women ... It's -- if anything -- A DEFORMATION to have a "hymen."

This is because the concept of such -- a BLOCKED entry to a body canal, sexual or not...

Is NONSENSE. It's not logical. It's not practical. It isn't part of how NATURE WORKS basically.

So "hymen" doesn't align with natural selection, nature, bioenergetic optimality...

Or even COMMON SENSE. "Hymen" in reality is essentially stenosis, vaginismus, or other issues.



Normal women/girls don't have "blocked vaginas that need to be broken."

This is retarded and makes no fucking sense. Really, just think about it...

Think. REALLY THINK FOR A FUCKING SECOND. Is a "hymen" even logical?

Of course not, because IT DOESN'T FUCKING EXIST. Thank you. Live & Learn.


In young girls who notice such ... Here's a hint why ... THEY'RE YOUNG. THEIR ANATOMY CHANGES.

This is not an example of any so-called "hymen" because of vaginal tightness or apparent fusion...

In young girls. I've heard of TONS of teen girls talking of such things, "tightness" & similar issues...

Kinda like some guys talk of a TIGHT foreskin. But this is NOT in an exactness a technical "hymen."


Many girls say "it just goes away" or they have to slowly open it enough to whatever satisfaction.

But this is NOT proving some or any sort of "hymen" naturally grows, exists, or occurs to block the vagina.

That makes NO FUCKING SENSE anatomically. Why would you have to BREAK tissue to enter a canal?

Imagine a fucking anal or rectum "hymen" JFL. Would that fucking sound rational to any scientist, seriously?


Does it sound fucking rational to ANY OF YOU ON HERE -- JUST FUCKING THINK...


HERE FOR A SECOND. A natural blockage to any cavity? Imagine a mouth hymen.

An asshole hymen. A pee-hole hymen/urethra hymen. Does this make any sense?

NO. Girls/women don't have "hymens." Wake the fuck up already you slow brains...
 
Last edited:
Then what tf made me bleed

How old & from what type of action?

Many girls bleed & assume it's a "hymen" but if you're shoving King Kong Dildos or scraping with your nails...

Of course you will bleed, especially if you're new to your hole. Depends on hormones, hydration level, conditions.

The bottom line is that this mythical "hymen" is not why a lot of girls may bleed from sexual acts or etc.

It's just made up because coping sandniggers in ancient times wanted to pretend like purity is somehow etched in to a female physiology...

When in reality there is no such thing as "purity" & nothing in nature naturally & optimally blocks the vagina.
 
How old & from what type of action?

Many girls bleed & assume it's a "hymen" but if you're shoving King Kong Dildos or scraping with your nails...

Of course you will bleed, especially if you're new to your hole.

The bottom line is that this mythical "hymen" is not why a lot of girls may bleed from sexual acts or etc.
18 from normal sex
 
18 from normal sex

"Normal sex" that explains it then jfl.

Most "normal sex" usually involves confusion, the wrong approach & at 18 often poor perception.

Could have been from not enough lubrication, scratched by a nail, dick inserted a suboptimal angle, or too rough/friction.

The bottom line is bleeding from sex can happen virgin or not, which means there's no consistent definition of a "hymen."
 
it exists, its just not something that should be representing virginity

It doesn't consistently or technically exist in an objectively definable, narrow type of concrete/scientific understanding, no.

And if you read the post, I explain what often is a "hymen" in practicality, i.e., often conditions/overlapping issues & deformities.

Saying you "bled your first time" doesn't prove there's an actual hymen or was an actual hymen there in any way, as many nonvirgin girl too can bleed from sex. I've even seen women in porn that have bled sometimes from sex, & those women have TONS of dick experience.

Also, claiming you had something "blocking" or "tight down there" can just as easily count as stenosis, vaginismus, just "subclinically."
 
It doesn't consistently or technically exist in an objectively definable, narrow type of concrete/scientific understanding, no.

And if you read the post, I explain what often is a "hymen" in practicality, i.e., often conditions/overlapping issues & deformities.

Saying you "bled your first time" doesn't prove there's an actual hymen or was an actual hymen there in any way, as many nonvirgin girl too can bleed from sex. I've even seen women in porn that have bled sometimes from sex, & those women have TONS of dick experience.

Also, claiming you had something "blocking" or "tight down there" can just as easily count as stenosis, vaginismus, just "subclinically."
it exists (and its actually really visible) and its a thin and stretchy tissue that is located at the opening of the vagina. and It doesnt completly block the entry, it usually has one or more holes in the center.

after the first sexual intercourse happens, It ruptures, and can cause bleeding.

and yeah, nonvirgin women can bleed from sex too, not because of the hymen, but because of medical disturbs or injuries in the vagina that can be caused by dryness (which isnt necessarelly vaginismus or menopause).
 
it exists (and its actually really visible) and its a thin and stretchy tissue that is located at the opening of the vagina. and It doesnt completly block the entry, it usually has one or more holes in the center.

after the first sexual intercourse happens, It ruptures, and can cause bleeding.

and yeah, nonvirgin women can bleed from sex too, not because of the hymen, but because of medical disturbs or injuries in the vagina that can be caused by dryness (which isnt necessarelly vaginismus or menopause).

Stop parroting BS, dummy. I already went through the trouble explaining to you & everyone else about why this is not true.

Unless you can provide some NEW and HARD TO ARGUE evidence against what I laid out, then don't waste your time here.
 
Stop parroting BS, dummy. I already went through the trouble explaining to you & everyone else about why this is not true.

Unless you can provide some NEW and HARD TO ARGUE evidence against what I laid out, then don't waste your time here.
stop spending time on this forum and go study some actual biology n****r
 
stop spending time on this forum and go study some actual biology n****r

Dumbass. Why do you think I made this? I've done EXTENSIVE study/analysis/research on this -- FAR more than you definitely have, stupid.

Someone with no knowledge would not make this kind of post. It's YOU who needs to study beyond the surface fucking level & dig deeper.
 
Dumbass. Why do you think I made this? I've done EXTENSIVE study/analysis/research on this -- FAR more than you definitely have, stupid.

Someone with no knowledge would not make this kind of post. It's YOU who needs to study beyond the surface fucking level & dig deeper.
r u srs or trolling :waitwhat:
 
Dumbass. Why do you think I made this? I've done EXTENSIVE study/analysis/research on this -- FAR more than you definitely have, stupid.

Someone with no knowledge would not make this kind of post. It's YOU who needs to study beyond the surface fucking level & dig deeper.
well change ur studying sources then
 
ikr? how is he trying to discuss about this with women

I've actually had many women agree with me on this, so your angle there ain't really that effective when it comes to female anatomy research.

A lot of known, major feminists have doubted the precise understanding of the existence of what mainstream idolizes as the "hymen." Things from misunderstanding in research as to what quantifies it, or what scientists even believe it is, or what can explain its purpose/so-called existence.

well change ur studying sources then

I don't ever stick to any one source, but learn/work off & grow from just mere "sources." Your dumbass probably doesn't even know how to research beyond GOOGLING something and then clicking on the first link, misinterpreting what it says, and then parroting that same BS to others.
 
Holy dnr.
Ramblings tbh
I can't verify if this is true, but you don't bring a compelling argument.
 
"Normal sex" that explains it then jfl.

Most "normal sex" usually involves confusion, the wrong approach & at 18 often poor perception.

Could have been from not enough lubrication, scratched by a nail, dick inserted a suboptimal angle, or too rough/friction.

The bottom line is bleeding from sex can happen virgin or not, which means there's no consistent definition of a "hymen."
I've never had a girl bleed from not enough lubrication.
 
I've actually had many women agree with me on this, so your angle there ain't really that effective when it comes to female anatomy research.

A lot of known, major feminists have doubted the precise understanding of the existence of what mainstream idolizes as the "hymen." Things from misunderstanding in research as to what quantifies it, or what scientists even believe it is, or what can explain its purpose/so-called existence.



I don't ever stick to any one source, but learn/work off & grow from just mere "sources." Your dumbass probably doesn't even know how to research beyond GOOGLING something and then clicking on the first link, misinterpreting what it says, and then parroting that same BS to others.
just check any book about gynecology, it explains it the exact same way i did but more detailed. since you have difficulties understanding basic stuff, u should probably check it.

feminists dont question the existence of the hymen, but its meaning.

nice rage bait tho n****r
 
the clitoris is also a myth, or so I've heard
 
Back
Top