Deleted member 62166
I'm better.
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2025
- Messages
- 41
- Reputation
- 83
This may shock or come across as humorous/trolling but it's 100% serious ... "Hymens" don't exist.
This was perpetuated by coping men in many years past ... A way to fulfill their fantasy of "virgin angels."
A way so men can pretend they know which women have had sex and which haven't, to judge them.
"No hymen, no diamond." "Cherry popping." It's all "virginial coping" by delusional men who pedestalize women; who value their sexual anatomy based on whether they believe it's "sealed & pure" or "used."
It's actual mental illness because it carries such deep connotations merely on account of arguable tissue.
It's essentially a hot debate in feminist circles, but even past the topical bullshit it's worth thinking about.
Truth is, there is no objectively, provable, irrefutable definition of what a "hymen" even practically is.
Much research surrounding it is just as dead-ended as plenty of other female anatomy research.
AKA in other words there's no perfect agreement physiologically as to what a "hymen" is.
There is no magical "seal" imbued in a female upon birth that designates her as "virgin."
The reality is a "hymen" is often a catch all word for VARIOUS symptomatic correlations...
Like vaginismus, labial fusion, etc. All of these together can PRESENT as the so-called "hymen."
But in reality there is no real "hymen." Some girls have nothing preventing entry to their vaginas...
That needs to be "broken" or such. It isn't consistently found. In reality, if something blocks the vagina...
It's probably subclinical vaginismus, a fused labia, vaginal stenosis, or some other development issue.
There is no "mark" of hymen in all women ... It's -- if anything -- A DEFORMATION to have a "hymen."
This is because the concept of such -- a BLOCKED entry to a body canal, sexual or not...
Is NONSENSE. It's not logical. It's not practical. It isn't part of how NATURE WORKS basically.
So "hymen" doesn't align with natural selection, nature, bioenergetic optimality...
Or even COMMON SENSE. "Hymen" in reality is essentially stenosis, vaginismus, or other issues.
Normal women/girls don't have "blocked vaginas that need to be broken."
This is retarded and makes no fucking sense. Really, just think about it...
Think. REALLY THINK FOR A FUCKING SECOND. Is a "hymen" even logical?
Of course not, because IT DOESN'T FUCKING EXIST. Thank you. Live & Learn.
In young girls who notice such ... Here's a hint why ... THEY'RE YOUNG. THEIR ANATOMY CHANGES.
This is not an example of any so-called "hymen" because of vaginal tightness or apparent fusion...
In young girls. I've heard of TONS of teen girls talking of such things, "tightness" & similar issues...
Kinda like some guys talk of a TIGHT foreskin. But this is NOT in an exactness a technical "hymen."
Many girls say "it just goes away" or they have to slowly open it enough to whatever satisfaction.
But this is NOT proving some or any sort of "hymen" naturally grows, exists, or occurs to block the vagina.
That makes NO FUCKING SENSE anatomically. Why would you have to BREAK tissue to enter a canal?
Imagine a fucking anal or rectum "hymen" JFL. Would that fucking sound rational to any scientist, seriously?
Does it sound fucking rational to ANY OF YOU ON HERE -- JUST FUCKING THINK...
HERE FOR A SECOND. A natural blockage to any cavity? Imagine a mouth hymen.
An asshole hymen. A pee-hole hymen/urethra hymen. Does this make any sense?
NO. Girls/women don't have "hymens." Wake the fuck up already you slow brains...
This was perpetuated by coping men in many years past ... A way to fulfill their fantasy of "virgin angels."
A way so men can pretend they know which women have had sex and which haven't, to judge them.
"No hymen, no diamond." "Cherry popping." It's all "virginial coping" by delusional men who pedestalize women; who value their sexual anatomy based on whether they believe it's "sealed & pure" or "used."
It's actual mental illness because it carries such deep connotations merely on account of arguable tissue.
It's essentially a hot debate in feminist circles, but even past the topical bullshit it's worth thinking about.
Truth is, there is no objectively, provable, irrefutable definition of what a "hymen" even practically is.
Much research surrounding it is just as dead-ended as plenty of other female anatomy research.
AKA in other words there's no perfect agreement physiologically as to what a "hymen" is.
There is no magical "seal" imbued in a female upon birth that designates her as "virgin."
The reality is a "hymen" is often a catch all word for VARIOUS symptomatic correlations...
Like vaginismus, labial fusion, etc. All of these together can PRESENT as the so-called "hymen."
But in reality there is no real "hymen." Some girls have nothing preventing entry to their vaginas...
That needs to be "broken" or such. It isn't consistently found. In reality, if something blocks the vagina...
It's probably subclinical vaginismus, a fused labia, vaginal stenosis, or some other development issue.
There is no "mark" of hymen in all women ... It's -- if anything -- A DEFORMATION to have a "hymen."
This is because the concept of such -- a BLOCKED entry to a body canal, sexual or not...
Is NONSENSE. It's not logical. It's not practical. It isn't part of how NATURE WORKS basically.
So "hymen" doesn't align with natural selection, nature, bioenergetic optimality...
Or even COMMON SENSE. "Hymen" in reality is essentially stenosis, vaginismus, or other issues.
Normal women/girls don't have "blocked vaginas that need to be broken."
This is retarded and makes no fucking sense. Really, just think about it...
Think. REALLY THINK FOR A FUCKING SECOND. Is a "hymen" even logical?
Of course not, because IT DOESN'T FUCKING EXIST. Thank you. Live & Learn.
In young girls who notice such ... Here's a hint why ... THEY'RE YOUNG. THEIR ANATOMY CHANGES.
This is not an example of any so-called "hymen" because of vaginal tightness or apparent fusion...
In young girls. I've heard of TONS of teen girls talking of such things, "tightness" & similar issues...
Kinda like some guys talk of a TIGHT foreskin. But this is NOT in an exactness a technical "hymen."
Many girls say "it just goes away" or they have to slowly open it enough to whatever satisfaction.
But this is NOT proving some or any sort of "hymen" naturally grows, exists, or occurs to block the vagina.
That makes NO FUCKING SENSE anatomically. Why would you have to BREAK tissue to enter a canal?
Imagine a fucking anal or rectum "hymen" JFL. Would that fucking sound rational to any scientist, seriously?
Does it sound fucking rational to ANY OF YOU ON HERE -- JUST FUCKING THINK...
HERE FOR A SECOND. A natural blockage to any cavity? Imagine a mouth hymen.
An asshole hymen. A pee-hole hymen/urethra hymen. Does this make any sense?
NO. Girls/women don't have "hymens." Wake the fuck up already you slow brains...
Last edited: