Join 58,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

the lion

Register to hide this ad
Hilarious, give this man 300,000 reps
 
Hilarious, give this man 271,301 reps
1760055761199.png
 
It depends; there is a sort of reciprocity between grammar and strictly logical meaning. Abbreviations, for example, are aberrant even if superficially useful from a social point of view.

When the grammatical error is minor, i.e. (that means) when the word is easily understandable, it is acceptable (if rare), otherwise it’s not and discredits much of what you write.


Abbreviations, on the other hand, “htn” being a prime example, are terrible.

Not only because “htn” is interpreted as a whole word, when in fact it is part of the macro-category of “normies”, but also because it is difficult to interpret due to its vague definition
Attractive is better, good looking is better
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top