Looksmaxxing Forum Logo

Join 75,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

Register Log in
  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

This is to anyone who says distortion does not matter.

Syniq

Syniq

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 25, 2025
Messages
177
Online time
1d 9h
Reputation
353
Distorted:
1783375262309.webp


Undistorted:
1783375162489.webp



And the undistorted one has less angularity due to lighting
 
Register to hide this ad
Holy hair holy hair 😂
 
His ratios get a lot better in the undistorted one.

If anyone believes that harmony doesn't matter; I am laughing at your face and stupidity.

Please, if you don't believe in harmony explain this
 
Yo syniq run my measurements through your formula
I need to see how harsh i need to adjust mine
 
miamigz said:
title should be "to anyone doubting my competence i will now confirm your doubts"
Click to expand...
I can't tell if you're joking or not.

Which might be a sign of autism on my part. But then again, I can never tell with people from here...

What's your point? Are you saying that he doesn't look better in the undistorted one? Lmao
 
who is this
 
Syniq said:
I can't tell if you're joking or not.

Which might be a sign of autism on my part. But then again, I can never tell with people from here...

What's your point? Are you saying that he doesn't look better in the undistorted one? Lmao
Click to expand...
I'm trying to say that he chose two images of somebody with completely different expressions and haircuts/styling and lighting and blames it on "muh muh lens distortion," and while that undoubtably is a factor it is not what is causing the drastic difference you see and is the sum of the distortion + all the other things I mentioned causing the difference.
 
Last edited:
miamigz said:
I'm trying to say that he chose two images of somebody with completely different expressions and haircuts/styling and lighting and blames it on "muh muh lens distortion," and while that undoubtably a factor it is not what is causing the drastic difference you see and is the sum of the distortion + all the other things I mentioned causing the difference.
Click to expand...
I can't stop laughing. Good God, you are laughably stupid.

You fucking moron. Can you explain how his ESR goes from 0.495 to 0.483? Can you explain why his cheekbones look more projected in the undistorted one. What about the nose looking smaller?

"expressions" You know I read books on facial aesthatics those do not change attractiveness that much. Hair? Hair doesn't change nose lenght or width.

You are STUPID high IQ indian. God damn it, thank you for making me laugh
 
Syniq said:
I can't stop laughing. Good God, you are laughably stupid.

You fucking moron. Can you explain how his ESR goes from 0.495 to 0.483? Can you explain why his cheekbones look more projected in the undistorted one. What about the nose looking smaller?

"expressions" You know I read books on facial aesthatics those do not change attractiveness that much. Hair? Hair doesn't change nose lenght or width.

You are STUPID high IQ indian. God damn it, thank you for making me laugh
Click to expand...
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 NGA!!! I literally admitted that it was some of the diference however normies (like those on .com) won't notice his esr they will most likely notice his "changed angularity" that is mostly due to lighting (like you admitted in OP). I literally admitted lens distortion was a factor idiot in my message "and while that [lens distortion] undoubtably is a factor" 🤣
 
miamigz said:
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 NGA!!! I literally admitted that it was some of the diference however normies (like those on .com) won't notice his esr they will most likely notice his "changed angularity" that is mostly due to lighting (like you admitted in OP). I literally admitted lens distortion was a factor idiot in my message "and while that [lens distortion] undoubtably is a factor" 🤣
Click to expand...
It is the main effector.

You're joking? Won't notice ESR? So they won't notice his eyes more far apart? Harmony is subconscious for people, we notice things that are extreme yes, but the small stuff we notice subconsciously. It's simple really; I'm so fucking done with "we do not notice harmony" If we don't then everyone has 99% harmony. Take hateeq for example, what makes his rate only 7.6 instead of higher? HARMONY his angularity is great, misc could do some work and his dimo is again good.


This is just stupid. And the lighting would make him look better idiot. He has better angularity.


Weak argument. Stop, please, this is stupid on many levels.
 
Syniq said:
It is the main effector.

You're joking? Won't notice ESR? So they won't notice his eyes more far apart? Harmony is subconscious for people, we notice things that are extreme yes, but the small stuff we notice subconsciously. It's simple really; I'm so fucking done with "we do not notice harmony" If we don't then everyone has 99% harmony. Take hateeq for example, what makes his rate only 7.6 instead of higher? HARMONY his angularity is great, misc could do some work and his dimo is again good.


This is just stupid. And the lighting would make him look better idiot. He has better angularity.


Weak argument. Stop, please, this is stupid on many levels.
Click to expand...
Harmony matters ur putting words in my mouth bhai🤣🤣🤣 all i'm saying is that the average foid/normie indeed will not notice his ESR difference first or consider it the main factor. The average normie who isn't in this space would most likely difference in angularity & skintone caused by lighting and the change in hairstyle.

It's difficult to know which factor contributes most to an average viewer's impression unless the other variables are controlled is what I'm trying to say

I'm not arguing that there isn't distortion, I'm just saying there are plenty of better examples you could have used where the subject in two photos does not have significantly different lighting and hairstyle because that would then force the normie to look closer and thus notice consciously (yes I am aware everybody already subconsciously acknowledges harmony) the change in his ESR, ear protrusion, etc... caused by true lens distortion.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (Looksmaxxers: 0, Guests: 1)
Back
Top