Join 75,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

this part black dude who only claims white is telling me black people are the problem

Register to hide this ad
every racebaiter isn’t the race they claim to be
 
actually if we look at the epstein island enjoyers list
Different topic. Plus they are all rich and contribute to society more than all of Africa could ever contribute
 
Different topic. Plus they are all rich and contribute to society more than all of Africa could ever contribute
Still fucked up what they do. But if a small price needs to be paid for their fruits then ig

Either way they would get what they want
 
Different topic. Plus they are all rich and contribute to society more than all of Africa could ever contribute
tbh you cant blame just race
socioeconomic and shiet
 
Different topic. Plus they are all rich and contribute to society more than all of Africa could ever contribute
Africa contributes not a lot take is genuinely braindead.
The DRC alone supplies almost 2/3 of the world’s cobalt, a critical input for batteries and modern electronics, while African countries are major sources of copper, platinum, chromium, manganese, gold, graphite etc.

And yes, some industries also rely heavily on cheap African labour and raw-material supply chains; removing them would mean massive price increases and supply disruptions, not “nothing happens.”

At the same time, many African countries have been heavily held back by corruption, political instability, exploitation and terrorism. That doesn't mean the continent has nothing to contribute.

Also stop talking about “Africans” like they're one people. An Ethiopian ≠ a Nigerian ≠ a Tanzanian ≠ a Moroccan. Africa has thousands of ethnic groups and over 2,000 languages.
 
Africa contributes not a lot take is genuinely braindead.
The DRC alone supplies almost 2/3 of the world’s cobalt, a critical input for batteries and modern electronics, while African countries are major sources of copper, platinum, chromium, manganese, gold, graphite etc.

And yes, some industries also rely heavily on cheap African labour and raw-material supply chains; removing them would mean massive price increases and supply disruptions, not “nothing happens.”

At the same time, many African countries have been heavily held back by corruption, political instability, exploitation and terrorism. That doesn't mean the continent has nothing to contribute.

Also stop talking about “Africans” like they're one people. An Ethiopian ≠ a Nigerian ≠ a Tanzanian ≠ a Moroccan. Africa has thousands of ethnic groups and over 2,000 languages.
None of these resource extractions wouldn’t be working had colonialism not happen

Africa can only ever contribute so much with their natural resources with what was given to them.

They aren’t innovative at all. And I do agree that some countries are trying and are being stopped by European powers. An example could be burkino faso and France or what happened to Libya.

But Africans are inherently lower iq so they more rely on their strength given to them from genetics. Unfortunately strong men isn’t really needed anymore in today’s society
 
None of these resource extractions wouldn’t be working had colonialism not happen

Africa can only ever contribute so much with their natural resources with what was given to them.

They aren’t innovative at all. And I do agree that some countries are trying and are being stopped by European powers. An example could be burkino faso and France or what happened to Libya.

But Africans are inherently lower iq so they more rely on their strength given to them from genetics. Unfortunately strong men isn’t really needed anymore in today’s society
None of these resource extractions wouldn’t be working had colonialism not happen

Africa can only ever contribute so much with their natural resources with what was given to them.

They aren’t innovative at all. And I do agree that some countries are trying and are being stopped by European powers. An example could be burkino faso and France or what happened to Libya.

But Africans are inherently lower iq so they more rely on their strength given to them from genetics. Unfortunately strong men isn’t really needed anymore in today’s society
This argument is retarded on basic history. Colonialism shaped African economies, sure, but Africans were already mining, farming, trading and smelting iron long before Europeans showed up. Great Zimbabwe was a major city centuries before colonial rule.

“Yeah but they only have resources” isn't an argument either. Modern innovation depends on education, capital, infrastructure and R&D, not some racial stat bonus. Africa has huge structural disadvantages, which obviously affects output.

And the “lower IQ by genetics” shit is not proven science. National IQ gaps don't magically demonstrate innate racial intelligence when schooling, nutrition, poverty, disease and institutions differ massively.

Also you're contradicting yourself: first Africans supposedly have no capacity, then foreign powers are supposedly stopping them from developing. Pick one.

And Africa isn't one race or culture. Ethiopian ≠ Nigerian ≠ Tanzanian ≠ Moroccan. Thousands of peoples and languages across the continent.


My brother in christ, you all have been misled about Africa
 
This argument is retarded on basic history. Colonialism shaped African economies, sure, but Africans were already mining, farming, trading and smelting iron long before Europeans showed up. Great Zimbabwe was a major city centuries before colonial rule.

“Yeah but they only have resources” isn't an argument either. Modern innovation depends on education, capital, infrastructure and R&D, not some racial stat bonus. Africa has huge structural disadvantages, which obviously affects output.

And the “lower IQ by genetics” shit is not proven science. National IQ gaps don't magically demonstrate innate racial intelligence when schooling, nutrition, poverty, disease and institutions differ massively.

Also you're contradicting yourself: first Africans supposedly have no capacity, then foreign powers are supposedly stopping them from developing. Pick one.

And Africa isn't one race or culture. Ethiopian ≠ Nigerian ≠ Tanzanian ≠ Moroccan. Thousands of peoples and languages across the continent.


My brother in christ, you all have been misled about Africa
also mansa musa had mad gold
 
This argument is retarded on basic history. Colonialism shaped African economies, sure, but Africans were already mining, farming, trading and smelting iron long before Europeans showed up. Great Zimbabwe was a major city centuries before colonial rule.

“Yeah but they only have resources” isn't an argument either. Modern innovation depends on education, capital, infrastructure and R&D, not some racial stat bonus. Africa has huge structural disadvantages, which obviously affects output.

And the “lower IQ by genetics” shit is not proven science. National IQ gaps don't magically demonstrate innate racial intelligence when schooling, nutrition, poverty, disease and institutions differ massively.

Also you're contradicting yourself: first Africans supposedly have no capacity, then foreign powers are supposedly stopping them from developing. Pick one.

And Africa isn't one race or culture. Ethiopian ≠ Nigerian ≠ Tanzanian ≠ Moroccan. Thousands of peoples and languages across the continent.


My brother in christ, you all have been misled about Africa
Africans are lower iq

Whites helped them via colonialism

Whites are responsible for their civilization

despite this I still believe colonialism was not good

I am against it

But without Africans wouldn’t be were they are now they would be behind
 
Africans are lower iq

Whites helped them via colonialism

Whites are responsible for their civilization

despite this I still believe colonialism was not good

I am against it

But without Africans wouldn’t be were they are now they would be behind
The “Africans are lower IQ” argument doesn't prove genetic inferiority when millions had limited access to quality education, healthcare and nutrition, with many forced to leave school early to support their families. You can't compare unequal conditions and call the result genetics.

And “whites helped Africans through colonialism” conveniently ignores forced labour, land theft, massacres, r**e, exploitation and stolen artefacts. That's not humanitarian aid.

Whites also didn't create African civilization. Africa already had Kush, Aksum, Mali, Songhai, Benin, Kongo, Great Zimbabwe and countless other societies before European colonialism. This is literally the continent where Homo sapiens originated.

Yes, colonial rule introduced infrastructure and institutions in some places, but that doesn't make Europeans responsible for African civilization. Colonial systems were largely built around extraction and control, and in many places helped create the political and economic conditions that later fed corruption and instability.

So “without Europeans Africa would be behind” is an impossible counterfactual. Colonialism changed Africa; it didn't create it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top