- Joined
- Jul 21, 2025
- Messages
- 3,266
- Time Online
- 10d 18h
- Reputation
- 11,930
Underrated cause of the death of romance:
Mixed gender schools
Up until the mid to late 20th century schools with male and female students were very rare in the western world.
"By the 1970s–1980s, coeducation became the standard in most of the developed world, at least at the primary and secondary levels."
Schools in the early 20th century:
Why is this a reason for inceldom?
Natural options:
A man and a woman at the same age meeting should always be connected with the intention of reproduction, at least to some degree.
We are supposed to have very limited options when it comes to a partner for reproduction.
In smaller towns/villages, the type of community humans are supposed to live in, the options for partners are very limited, "forcing" (not in a bad way, since it's natural) young people to find a partner amongst this small amount of contenders.
Conclusion "natural options":
Humans are supposed to have a limited range of possible partners to choose from, making inceldom rare.
Hypothetical:
Imagine you're a farmers boy living in a village, going to an all boys school, as it is intended.
Besides your sisters and maybe the daughters of a neighbouring farmer, you don't meet any girls.
And then someday, you stroll around the village further as usual, when you meet a new girl your age.
The immediate reaction of yours would be thinking of her as a possible wife.
And since the same situation applies to her, there's a natural intention of forming a family between you two.
I'm not saying you will actually form a family, but we can see the interaction has a deeper value and maybe the next girl you meet after her will actually become your wife.
Connection to schools:
If we connect the mentioned conclusion with the structure of the modern school system, we realise that mixed schools are working against the natural idea of having to find a partner amongst a small amount of possible partners.
Because in modern schools, women see 500+ different guys their age every day, interacting with them on a daily basis with no sexual intentions whatsoever.
Therefore the sacred bond between a man and a woman at the same age meeting each other is losing all it's value.
And I'm sure if I kept digging and tried to figure out what kind of people were pushing for the agenda of mixed schools, we all know who was responsible for it.
(I came up with this all by myself btw)
Mixed gender schools
Up until the mid to late 20th century schools with male and female students were very rare in the western world.
"By the 1970s–1980s, coeducation became the standard in most of the developed world, at least at the primary and secondary levels."
Schools in the early 20th century:
Natural options:
A man and a woman at the same age meeting should always be connected with the intention of reproduction, at least to some degree.
We are supposed to have very limited options when it comes to a partner for reproduction.
In smaller towns/villages, the type of community humans are supposed to live in, the options for partners are very limited, "forcing" (not in a bad way, since it's natural) young people to find a partner amongst this small amount of contenders.
Conclusion "natural options":
Humans are supposed to have a limited range of possible partners to choose from, making inceldom rare.
Hypothetical:
Imagine you're a farmers boy living in a village, going to an all boys school, as it is intended.
Besides your sisters and maybe the daughters of a neighbouring farmer, you don't meet any girls.
And then someday, you stroll around the village further as usual, when you meet a new girl your age.
The immediate reaction of yours would be thinking of her as a possible wife.
And since the same situation applies to her, there's a natural intention of forming a family between you two.
I'm not saying you will actually form a family, but we can see the interaction has a deeper value and maybe the next girl you meet after her will actually become your wife.
Connection to schools:
If we connect the mentioned conclusion with the structure of the modern school system, we realise that mixed schools are working against the natural idea of having to find a partner amongst a small amount of possible partners.
Because in modern schools, women see 500+ different guys their age every day, interacting with them on a daily basis with no sexual intentions whatsoever.
Therefore the sacred bond between a man and a woman at the same age meeting each other is losing all it's value.
And I'm sure if I kept digging and tried to figure out what kind of people were pushing for the agenda of mixed schools, we all know who was responsible for it.
(I came up with this all by myself btw)
