The inclusion of women on platforms like this might seem fair and egalitarian, but when analyzed objectively through statistical, psychological, and sociological lenses, the presence of women distorts the dynamics of communities like ours. This is not a baseless argument; it’s supported by data on the Pareto distribution, dating statistics, and human social behavior. This thread aims to explore why banning women is not misogyny but rather a necessity to maintain the integrity and purpose of our platform.
The Pareto Principle in Dating Dynamics
The Pareto distribution (commonly known as the 80/20 rule) describes a phenomenon where 80% of outcomes result from 20% of inputs. In dating, this translates to 10% of men attracting 90% of women.
The Pareto Principle in Dating Dynamics
The Pareto distribution (commonly known as the 80/20 rule) describes a phenomenon where 80% of outcomes result from 20% of inputs. In dating, this translates to 10% of men attracting 90% of women.
- Women, statistically, tend to seek partners who rank in the top 10% of attractiveness, social status, or resources.
- Platforms like this, which discuss and critique male experiences, naturally attract men who are part of the 90% excluded from female attention.
- The presence of women on such platforms reinforces the hierarchy. Instead of fostering solidarity among men, it creates further division as users compete for the validation of a small minority of women.
