Discussion why aren't you a Nazi?

[Frax]

 

[Sovvton]

bc hitler was a drug addict and looksminner

theres no way i could believe in the ideaologies of such a man

 

[Mess]

I believe in the superiority of the intelligent, the masterclass.
I can't stand other mindless white folk, believing they're better for their skin.
It's stupid, our skin is only different due to melanin.

 

[over0]

You guys do know he killed the autistic people too

 

[Decay]

I believe in the superiority of the intelligent, the masterclass.
I can't stand other mindless white folk, believing they're better for their skin.
It's stupid, our skin is only different due to melanin.

What are you doing awake mess

 

[Mess]

What are you doing awake mess

I'm up to this time like everyday bud.

 

[Decay]

I'm up to this time like everyday bud.

Yeah same, It’s an issue

 

[Mess]

Yeah same, It’s an issue

Imma rub magnesium and melatonin spray onto my balls tomorrow.

 

[Decay]

Imma rub magnesium and melatonin spray onto my balls tomorrow.

That might be the fucking strategy

 

[Mess]

That might be the fucking strategy

I actually did with some magnesium spray, and you can feel an improvement.
With melatonin, it might just be meta.

 

[Decay]

I actually did with some magnesium spray, and you can feel an improvement.
With melatonin, it might just be meta.

Boss move, mess. Might hop on the meta

 

[raspadinha]

because its retarded

 

[Frax]

I believe in the superiority of the intelligent, the masterclass.
I can't stand other mindless white folk, believing they're better for their skin.
It's stupid, our skin is only different due to melanin.

you're retarded,

---

https://www.mdpi.com/2624-8611/1/1/34/htm

https://www.researchgate.net/public...nitive_Ability_in_a_Sample_of_American_Youths
"
Here we apply this technique to examine SIRE differences in g. We find that
African and Amerindian ancestry are strongly negatively associated with general
cognitive ability among African, Hispanic, and other American subsamples. This
replicates previous research which showed that genetic ancestry predicts
cognitive ability, independent of socioeconomic status and phenotypic
discrimination variables which are the usual suspects (Kirkegaard et al., 2019;
Lasker et al., 2019; Warne, 2020). The importance of such analyses within SIRE
groups is that they shed light on the cause of g differences between SIRE groups
with respect to similarities in developmental processes (Rowe, Vazsonyi &
Flannery, 1994)
"

"
The ancestry effects are consistent in direction across subsamples and hold
after controlling for a wide array of economic and social factors, including migrant
status, SIRE, ethnic attachment, measures of discrimination, phenotypic indices
of race, and general SES. These results suggest that African, Hispanic, and other
groups have inherited alleles from their African and Amerindian ancestors which
make them liable to lower levels of g. In fact, as seen in Table 5 (Model 2), 100%,
76%, 81%, and 100% of the respective Black, Native American, Other, and
Hispanic SIRE effects were explained by genetic ancestry. This association
between genetic ancestry and g suggests a partial genetic basis for observed
SIRE differences.
"

https://www.mdpi.com/2624-8611/1/1/34
"
We conducted an admixture study to assess the association between cognitive ability and European ancestry in the African- and European-American populations. Earlier researchers (e.g., [51,52]) were unable to detect significant relationships between ancestry and cognitive ability. We, however, found a strong, significant association between European genetic ancestry and cognitive ability, confirming the recent results of both Kirkegaard et al. [24] and Warne [25].
"
"
Rushton and Jensen [9] called for modern genetic studies to test the hereditarian model. They predicted that "for those Black individuals who possess more White genes, their physical, behavioral, and other characteristics will approach those of Whites" ([9], p. 262). In the present study, we confirmed that this was the case for general cognitive ability. Moreover, we showed that the association between European ancestry and g was substantially mediated by eduPGS rather than skin color PGS. These results provide support for a hereditarian model.
"
The findings of both the studies were

-Consistent with predictions from the genetic nypothesis, African and Amerindian ancestry were both found to be negatively associated with [IQ/ general intelligence]. The association was robust to controls for multiple cultural,

-Socioeconomic, and phenotypic factors. Higher-levels of European ancestry in African- Americans correlates to higher-IQ

-Common alleles in various human populations can predict intelligence & various SNPs


TLDR- Genetics are responsible for IQ and human intelligence along with environment. n*****s from Africa= Lowest IQ independent of socio-economic factors . African Americans IQ mog africans by large margin and with higher european ancestry their IQ scores on average increases but still the top 5% of blacks score mediocre in intelligence. Ashkenazi and Asian =Highest IQs. White Europeans= In the middle

---

Other factors than in the image are important, but you get the picture. Higher IQ brains are just superior at being brains (to a point, as extreme high IQ may actually tend toward being maladaptive - either because everyone else is several standard deviations below you [meaning no real ability to form meaningful relationships or connections, especially if the IQ gap exceeds 25-30 points] or due to something inherently negative about such neural phenotypes in particular).

They have faster action potentials, more cortical neurons, more cortical neuron density, more cortical neuron synaptic density, longer and more branching dendrites, more information transfer (less degradation) across neuronal/synaptic relays, etc. etc.

There are *obvious* biological links to high IQ being a brain based trait (of course), the greatest genetic differences between races are *far* from being "skin colour" (as they are fond of reducing the genetic complexity of race to for ideological reasons and moral/intellectual subversion), are actually genes/alleles related to the brain and endocrine system. Around 1/3rd of human functional DNA codes for proteins important for the nervous system and brain, it's that important and complex in genetic terms, and was *the* most selected for/against organ in *any* human population (all of which would have had different environmental/social conditions enacting different selection). Even basic things like how neurons even form and then develop differ much more than does skin colour, genetically, between races. This strongly indicates that the gene differences we can observe for the nervous system and pituitary system (affecting thoughts, feelings, personality, cognition, personality/temperament/behaviour/etc.) were selected over evolutionary time to adapt their racial traits (on average) in order that they would act/behave differently than other populations - in order to function better as and where they are through adaptations to varying local environmental and social/cultural conditions for different populations. The gene differences wouldn't exist if they weren't doing *something* (differently), as they wouldn't have been selected for/against without selective pressure, meaning that functioning and structure of different races' brains *will* be affected, meaning that cognition/intelligence/IQ *will* be affected (to varying degrees for different gene sets/patterns in different populations), amongst other cognitive and behavioural traits. Sad that such studies must be sought from China now because the West is too politically correct to allow them anymore.

Then there is the *reality* of bio-cultural feedback altering human selective pressures and thus evolutionary pathways in humans (which are animals that are *highly* adapted to making, using/enforcing, refining, systematizing aspects of, and crafting into socially beneficial, conflict mediating, and behaviour shaping adaptive social technologies we call "Culture/s" [in fact, for humans, Culture may be a necessary, critical social technology for populational and genetic continuity - we literally cannot live in any natural environment on Earth without utilizing and developing a Culture appropriate for the unique environmental and social needs and the unique racial/genetic/biological needs of the population/s in question. Bio-cultural feedback is simply how genes and culture co-evolve over time in a feedback loop (though initial proto-Culture is downstream from genetics in terms of its nature, over time, the river grows turbulent, with Culture and genetics being less separate things than they become almost united and entwined almost inseparably - neither "down" or "up" stream from the other any longer [over evolutionary time scales], both forming a figurative whirlpool with each other that is emergently much more in its effects, complexity, importance, than either Culture or genetics alone - yet most people are completely ignorant of bio-cultural feedback, its effects, how they work, what they have historically selected-for-and-against/caused-genetically. I'm not a "Red-Pill" professor who gets paid to spread the Truth, so I won't give an entire course on bio-cultural feedback/interactions, but I will give you a few examples of how it works and you can connect the dots yourself to apply the concept for other situations or possibilities.

First, understand that human evolution has *accelerated* since the advent of agricultural Civilization (in fact, it's now faster than ever before). You can confirm this on even Wikipedia's "Recent Human Evolution" page, near the first references (IIRC). It has been hypothesized that *Culture* shapes human evolution through selective pressures, especially after populations and Cultures could (and *needed to*) grow so much larger and so much more complex than before agriculture. Think about it and it makes perfect sense.

Hunter-Gatherers who barely even engage in primitive horticulture, let alone organized and complex systems of agricultural production - which all require (no matter which People's form of agricultural Civilization) advanced social adaptations for organization, labour, laws, ways to manage dense populations, etc., etc., as well as biological adaptations, technological and linguistic advancement surpassing the requisite minimal level, as well as sedentary natures (requiring adaptation in itself) - will have been selected for and adapted to/for completely different environments, social norms and behaviours, and survival strategies. They would be likely to be more r-selected (as opposed to K), higher in aggression, higher in impulsivity, higher narcissistic traits, lower intelligence (because Civilizations and their survival strategies, civil codes, and more select for higher intelligence than pre-Civilization tribal populations would *ever* experience) higher in traits that seem like ADHD but are adaptive for their form of survival and life, higher biological investment in physical traits than a more advanced-cognition-dependant survival strategy (necessarily biologically "taking" from cognitive investment), more ethnocentric/tribal (by far), a morality system wholly different from Civilized populations and incompatible with Civilization itself, many different personality and temperament differences, probably emotional differences, and likely many other differences in cognition, behaviour, and features.

Consider the populations/races that never developed agricultural Civilization on their own at all or who got it from other populations (or convergently developed it on their own) *much* later than, for example, Europeans or Asians - some of them still living as isolated tribes of hunter-gatherers, some of them now forcibly integrated into a system they are not evolved or adapted for (desperately struggling against their own traits and natures, which will not adapt naturally to the level of the longer-term Civilized populations for centuries or even millenia for the most important and significant adaptations, to agriculturalize themselves as their only means to try to compete and survive in modern times in order to preserve their genetic and cultural continuity) as in various 3rd world countries still run by the indigenous population, some of them living in our Western Civilization and countries (which, again, they are just not adapted for on average). The first type is now extremely rare, but still exists in very remote places like for the Sentinelese population or some groups of Amerindian or some groups of Australian Aborigines (and related islanders), some types of sub-Saharan Africans, and not many more. The second type would include races of sub-Saharan African that never developed agricultural Civilization on their own, historically (only since Europeans conquered them and then gave them tech/medicine have they been agricultural, and poorly so) or received it from others *long* after its invention (as Bantu received certain agricultural or animal husbandry related innovations and ideas/concepts from Egypt, through Nubia, etc.) and have only been practicing it with any seriousness for a mere handful of centuries at most (meaning *minimal* adaptations to the Civilized survival strategy and social systems) it would also include other such populations which are now sovereign and possess a country but which have only relatively recently adopted agricultural foundations and shifted their society toward an agricultural strategy (which would change selective pressures through bio-cultural feedback and effects, but quite slowly, so these populations and countries would, by and large, be dysfunctional shitholes by early agriculturalized Civilization standards).

The people of such populations and countries would be of completely different natures than types that agricultural Civilization requires to function properly - even worse, they never slowly evolved bio-culturally along with their advancements in agriculture over millenia, they have been thrust into a world that demands a fully finished system of agriculture (based on myriad prior social, biological, and cultural adaptations over time) which they do not get to learn to utilize in their own way or develop uniquely and distinctly as befits their racial natures; they must simply use a fully developed system they are nowhere near adapted to either socially or biologically all while lacking the adaptations required for urban populations to function and cooperate smoothly and in an organized fashion.

What traits can we see in such populations today much more commonly than in longer-term agriculturally Civilized populations? All the traits I said before, including lower intelligence, lesser abstract thinking ability, less developed languages and social systems, more impulsivity, aggression, narcissism, completely alien moralities to the Civilized races, short term thinking, r-selection, etc. etc. It fits.

Now consider for the agriculturally Civilized populations that evolved into Europeans, Asians, MENAs, some types of Amerindian (but for less time), Indians, and a few others. Each will have had a different Culture that evolved into an agricultural Civilization, which means that each of them will have unique qualities and traits caused by these differences in the foundations and in selection over development. But we still see some central similarities involving higher (to different degrees) intelligence, lower impulsivity, aggression, narcissism, sedentary-adaptions, urbanism-adaptions, social adaptions for larger populations, better systems of division of labour, higher R-selection, higher abstract thinking, more complex languages and Cultures, etc. Not all of them will have adapted equally in terms of level or direction toward agriculturalized Civilization, but they will all have had much more selection for adaptive traits in the context of urban and agricultural Civilizations.

An example of how this would happen, over centuries to thousands of years, would be the necessity for early urbanists adapting to agriculturalism and being sedentary to develop *Civil Codes* (a system of laws and punishments and protection/maintenance of Order). Civil codes of such early Peoples are almost always very severe, for instance the Code of Hammurabi or other early codifications of Law. Often, punishments for particularly antisocial crimes (such as rapes, murders, kidnappings, [especially nighttime] arsons, etc.) would be death or would basically amount to it anyway. Either execution upon conviction, or perhaps if "lucky" exilement and outcasting from the People (which for such individuals in such populations would almost certainly mean a slow death of starvation, exposure, and/or eventually getting killed by a predator or enslaved/killed by other exiles/outcasts).

The people who would most likely commit the crimes that received such genetic line extinguishing punishments would be young males in their teenage years (perhaps early twenties) who had not yet reproduced or taken a wife. Therefore, the genes/alleles that cause predisposition to such crimes, to aggression, to impulsivity, to antisocial/cluster-B traits, to lower intelligence, to r-selection, to short term thinking and planning, etc. (a plethora of interrelated traits and genes/alleles) would be weeded out of the population as a whole over the timescales we're talking about - simply due to the genes/alleles that cause such Civilizationally maladaptive and antisocial behaviours would be being consistently removed from the gene pool before reproduction (or with greatly limited reproduction, if a rapist got his rapee pregnant, or if someone managed to avoid these crimes despite their genetic tendency toward them until later than usual and had already sired children - even then there would be a selective pressure being exerted: for those who possess these anti-Civilizational traits and tendencies due to genetic reasons to adapt/evolve other genes/alleles that would counter such tendencies and allow them to succeed at surviving to reproduce without committing grievous crimes [so even the criminally natured, genetically, get "uplifted" over time through bio-cultural feedback, leading to the rise of alleles that balance out negative traits or allow them to be more easily suppressed or controlled as behaviours]).

Overall, and over time, different Civilizations followed this same process of basically bioengineering (in the old-fashioned manner) their entire populations to make them fit for urban, agricultural Civilization while adapting to remain competitive with other urban and agricultural Civilizations in another feedback loop.

Bio-cultural feedback (and other effects) plus cold winters theory, taken together, likely explain almost the entire reason for the uniquely internally-common characteristics and traits of Europeans and NE Asians.

But bio-cultural effects are not just limited to civil codes, rather, literally *everything* about a Culture and a Civilization shapes and selects for various traits and behaviours (genetically and epi-genetically). So with all this understood, let's look at the third type of population I mentioned above - the kind most closest to type 2, sub-Saharan Africans who are now sovereign and agriculturalizing/urbanizing (even attempting industrialization) literally *thousands of years before their populations have had the time and selective pressure to adapt to these forms of life, organization, survival, and to evolve toward appropriate traits as a whole group/society - except that the third type isn't a sovereign People with their own country; the third type is the non-/pre-agricultural populations or extremely recently agriculturalized populations within the Western countries and Civilization. So, for example, Australian Aborigines, or N. American Amerindians, or sub-Saharan Africans and/or SS African / European hybrids like North American Blacks (who are about 23% European in DNA on average IIRC).

All of these populations are a problem for us and for themselves because they haven't had time and selective pressure to appropriately Civilize them genetically for proper functioning within our form of Civilization. And we know that it would take thousands of years to do this through eugenic processes ala the original method that our ancestors used - so they will *always* be a problem on any timescale that matters to us (without intentional bioengineering to genetically "uplift" them).

We also know that governments and politicians are not considering these genetic realities when they are bringing genetic and Cultural aliens en masse to the West. These adaptations to urbanism, agriculture, Civilization as Westerns/Europeans know it and evolved to took us literally thousands of years to develop naturally through extremely complicated bio-cultural feedback loops that are impossible to replicate artificially.

Therefore, by mass immigration being enforced and its criticism illegalized or heavily socially shamed and policed leads to a future where all of these elegant and likely polygenic traits we've painstakingly evolved to fit Western Civilization would be disrupted/degraded or even lost altogether through admixture with differently Civilized (genetically) Peoples (wherein we will lose critical traits for Western Civilization due to gene mismatch, even if ethnogenesis were completely fulfilled we would need to adapt these genetic patterns again for our specific Civilizational/social environment and survival strategy), or, even worse, through admixture with non-/pre- agriculture/urban/Civilization adaptation populations or populations that only recently began to agriculturalize and urbanized through bio-cultural effects (which would basically throw Europeans/Whites back 2-5 or maybe even 5-7.5 or so thousands of years through the loss of our unique and characteristic racial adaptations, genetically, to Western/European Civilization.

This means everything will get shittier and shittier as mass migration continues. Our Civilization is essentially a super-organism, and each individual European is like a cell. The whole is meant to evolve along with and at the same time as the individuals, and the whole cannot simply be filled with individuals from a different Civilization or pre-Civilized Culture. We are not interchangeable. Furthermore, if this is true and we continue with the importation of such genetically different populations, we are directly harming the health of the super-organization we depend on for *everything*: our very Civilization. Based on the ideas I've discussed in thread, Civilizations best function when comprised of a singular relatively homogenous population, which must be especially and particularly adapted for the Culture and nature of the Civilization they form the individual cells of. The more different genetically distinct populations in a Civilization, the sicker the overall Civilization becomes as a super-organism, because many of its "cells" are now functioning in maladaptive ways that the Civilization didn't co-evolve bio-culturally to be able to handle. Eventually, demographic replacement or marginalization within our ancestral lands affects more than just the individuals being demographically replaced or forcibly marginalized - it affects the whole super-organism/Civilization, which *will die* following its becoming terminal after enough abuse, maladaptive population influxes, extreme marginalization and/or minoritization of the Civilization-founding population, and "transplant rejection" symptoms (incompatible populations mass imported who cause "symptoms", sometimes debilitating ones, to the super-organism either/both locally and/or systemically).

In short, we are in an accelerated process of Civilizational suicide, and our co-evolved super-organism is threatened by symptoms from transplant rejection, our dwindling numbers compared to other groups, and now even by *new bio-cultural feedback effects*. We are now being shaped and selected, dysgenically, to match a future deracinated slave state's ideal traits, wherein a homogenizing mass of genetically distinct individuals become evolutionarily stalled and stultified, adapting to maladaptive, unnatural, and inhuman conditions, Civilizational qualities, and bio-culturally selective factors in the new GloboHomo "Civilization" (human farm).

Things are grim, and if we don't turn it around before our super-organism does, it will take us centuries or millenia for Europeans to recover, if it is ever even possible after such a complete Civilizaticide. Educate others about bio-cultural evolution and about group selection toward different social and cultural traits and keep your aim on reforming homogenous societies within our threatened and sickened super-organism so that they function as Civilizational reserves as the other parts decline or die. And on stopping the mass invasion of "migrants" meant to genocide us through admixture and eventual violence as well as kill our Civilizational super-organism itself and replace it with some shit-tier amalgam Civilization comprised of dysgenic and maladaptive populations. This is more than personally or societally existential - this is fully Civilizationally existential.

TL;DR

I talk about why it is *obvious* that cognitive ability and other traits of cognition, behaviour, personality, and more, are genetically mediated and most certainly different enough between populations for their to be strong genetic differences in tendencies, cognition, behaviour, etc. A Chinese study shows the level of difference, genetically, for different systems/organs/functions/processes of the body, is highest for the brain and nervous system as well as the endocrine system, and much greater than skin colour differences in genetics. Next, I move onto bio-cultural feedback/effects/interactions - basically, a population's genetics and culture co-evolve to produce their overall Civilization and traits. I explain how this works and describe major aspects of Civilized and non-Civilized Cultures and Peoples caused through bio-cultural feedback and selection. Bio-cultural feedback and its genetic effects on populations is a very easy to explain (though not necessarily easy to fully understand) process of adaptation which would necessarily affect different races differently. It provides for an excellent argument against "diversity" and mass migration. Lastly, I pivot into explaining that Civilizations themselves are actually super-organisms, ones which we form the "cells" or "individual units" (like in ants, except our super-organism isn't held together pheremonally but is much more complex) and suggest that not only can such super-organisms get sick, be poisoned, or be injured, they can even become terminal and die. Once such a state is reached, it's self-fulfulling because no individual or groups will be able to heal it or to reverse the damage or to stop the cancer/parasites/invasive-transplants. At such a point, if allowed to be reached, the West will die no matter what we do, and whatever artificial crippled-zombie "Civilization" takes its place will be absolutely monstrous and not fit for Europeans-as-evolved. In such a case, it could take us hundreds of years to re-establish a European Civilization, made in our image and designed for us and our evolved natures. Such an outcome is unacceptable. Resist your *genocides*, first through admixture and then by violence, and protect the super-organism that shaped you and your ancestors so that future generations can be a part of such a living Civilization, adapted and designed for their traits (once we wrest back control). Use bio-cultural arguments against immigration and diversity and try to get people to understand the implications, many grave, of these concepts in-thread.

because its retarded

how