Join 75,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

JFL Why does genio schizo rant so much

@Xx_Sh4tteredHe4rt_xX idk if ur religious or not but this is an obvious logical fallacy right?
I'm religious, yes, and frankly i think it's better to just not discuss this any longer. Dwelling on this is only going to make u madder.
 
Oh my gosh bro more circular reasoning
You just assume roman records to be true without actual evidence for their legitimacy
All i see are logical fallacies im sorry that you have to be retarded like me
Im 67iq but you can be 40iq
You can’t just say Roman records are inaccurate without proving it 😅

You need an explanation buddy

Also you keep asking for me to elaborate such a simple topic: believe in Jesus 50%heaven 50%Nothing the reason you pick Jesus is bc of the mix of historical and scientific evidence

Just a good gamble with high roi
 
Bleh bleh bleh bloo bloo bloo blep blop collect all our messages put them into chat gpt and ask it who has a better written argument
Not even who’s correct but who has a better written argument
 
Bleh bleh bleh bloo bloo bloo blep blop collect all our messages put them into chat gpt and ask it who has a better written argument
Not even who’s correct but who has a better written argument
Unfortunately you have no argument

It’s me vs a spectator who asks clarifying questions lol 😭
 
You can’t just say Roman records are inaccurate without proving it 😅

You need an explanation buddy

Also you keep asking for me to elaborate such a simple topic: believe in Jesus 50%heaven 50%Nothing the reason you pick Jesus is bc of the mix of historical and scientific evidence

Just a good gamble with high roi
No? Thats simply just not how it works? Otherwise nothing in this community would be called cope? Its false or unproven until its proven true not the other way around?
Thats like saying thumbpulling works without solid studies and evidence
Omg ts is such a cope argument
I dont have to prove roman records are inaccurate. YOU have to prove they ARE accurate
 
You can’t just say Roman records are inaccurate without proving it 😅

You need an explanation buddy

Also you keep asking for me to elaborate such a simple topic: believe in Jesus 50%heaven 50%Nothing the reason you pick Jesus is bc of the mix of historical and scientific evidence

Just a good gamble with high roi
@abaloparatide ts argument is retarded asf lmaooo
 
Taking bout sum logical fallacies when you have done more then me 🥲

Ad hominem: Called me retarded

Straw man: simply said Roman records inaccurate without an explanation

The fallacy fallacy: just because I had a few logical fallacies you try to make it apparent to attack my point

Red herring: you say we shouldn’t debate abt religion to avoid the topic at hand, if you want to stop except defeat
 
stay quiet
 
Taking bout sum logical fallacies when you have done more then me 🥲

Ad hominem: Called me retarded

Straw man: simply said Roman records inaccurate without an explanation

The fallacy fallacy: just because I had a few logical fallacies you try to make it apparent to attack my point

Red herring: you say we shouldn’t debate abt religion to avoid the topic at hand, if you want to stop except defeat
Not a straw man fallacy btw. I questioned how they were accurate never said that they were inaccurate. FALLACY FALLACY FALLACY NIGGAAAAA btw you say to “accept defeat” as if the whole purpose of an argument is to win or lose. No, arguments are meant to find the truth. Also yeah im gonna ad hominem fuck you bitch n***a
 
GOOD NIGHT BHAIS!!!
IM CORRECT PRAY TO YOUR 67 IQ GOD YOU PLEBEIAN IM CORRECT HAHAHAHA
 
Not a straw man fallacy btw. I questioned how they were accurate never said that they were inaccurate. FALLACY FALLACY FALLACY NIGGAAAAA btw you say to “accept defeat” as if the whole purpose of an argument is to win or lose. No, arguments are meant to find the truth. Also yeah im gonna ad hominem fuck you bitch n***a
You can win an argument lol

Eg: Lincoln v Douglass and Public forum

It is a stawman, asking how it’s accurate is so fucking stupid

Like it could be fake but then any piece of history before cameras could be fake and that’s a really stupid take

Such a good boy submitting and showing how his “argument” is full of logical fallacies 🥹

Pets for you
 
GOOD NIGHT BHAIS!!!
IM CORRECT PRAY TO YOUR 67 IQ GOD YOU PLEBEIAN IM CORRECT HAHAHAHA
No your not

HAVE FUN ROTTING IN HELL WHILE I GET INFINITE BEER IN HEAVEN

At the end of the day we’re still friends ❤️🍻
 
I genuinely am above you you little plebeian pray to me as your god
No you lack testosterone

My god has hella testosterone
 
No your not

HAVE FUN ROTTING IN HELL WHILE I GET INFINITE BEER IN HEAVEN

At the end of the day we’re still friends ❤️🍻
We not friends tho bitch n***a js to get that straight
Hard feelings fuck you bitch
😂😂
You think YOU’re my friend what a r****d my godly brain works on a different level than yours
 
No your not

HAVE FUN ROTTING IN HELL WHILE I GET INFINITE BEER IN HEAVEN

At the end of the day we’re still friends ❤️🍻
brah I don’t think beer is allowed up there

not in Christianity anyways (which im pretty sure you said you were)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top