Rage Women shouldn’t have rights

[Vitrokea]

Statistically speaking women were better off in the 1930s and 1950s when I didn’t have as many rights as they do now when they didn’t have dating app and a thousand different options for men that’s why most are brainless hypergamy foids that can’t think for themselves and only want men that are completely out of their league it’s insane how they think they’re worth and man 6ft and above simply because they are women.

 

[Beatrice.]

Statistically speaking women were better off in the 1930s and 1950s when I didn’t have as many rights as they do now when they didn’t have dating app and a thousand different options for men that’s why most are brainless hypergamy foids that can’t think for themselves and only want men that are completely out of their league it’s insane how they think they’re worth and man 6ft and above simply because they are women.

You would have done the same if you were a girl

 

[Deleted Member 81310]

Statistically speaking women were better off in the 1930s and 1950s when I didn’t have as many rights as they do now when they didn’t have dating app and a thousand different options for men that’s why most are brainless hypergamy foids that can’t think for themselves and only want men that are completely out of their league it’s insane how they think they’re worth and man 6ft and above simply because they are women.

Yeah ur right

 

[trueceljester]

Statistically speaking women were better off in the 1930s and 1950s when I didn’t have as many rights as they do now when they didn’t have dating app and a thousand different options for men that’s why most are brainless hypergamy foids that can’t think for themselves and only want men that are completely out of their league it’s insane how they think they’re worth and man 6ft and above simply because they are women.

Highkey we should jus return to being cavemen atp

 

[Vitrokea]

You would have done the same if you were a girl

“you would’ve done the same” dodges the point. Women in the 1930s–50s didn’t have more leverage, they had fewer choices and fewer rights. That isn’t being “better off,” it’s being constrained. Dating apps didn’t create unrealistic standards they just made preferences visible, on both sides. And judging half the population as incapable of thinking for themselves isn’t an argument, it’s just frustration dressed up as certainty.

 

[Vitrokea]

Highkey we should jus return to being cavemen atp

Nah we should just kill the modern day women and keep the ones with realistic, stand points for a man

 

[Deleted Member 106619]

giving women rights and the ability to work jobs beyond nurse/teacher/etc destroyed society

 

[Beatrice.]

“you would’ve done the same” dodges the point. Women in the 1930s–50s didn’t have more leverage, they had fewer choices and fewer rights. That isn’t being “better off,” it’s being constrained. Dating apps didn’t create unrealistic standards they just made preferences visible, on both sides. And judging half the population as incapable of thinking for themselves isn’t an argument, it’s just frustration dressed up as certainty.

You are a schizo

 

[Deleted Member 106619]

Nah we should just kill the modern day women and keep the ones with realistic, stand points for a man

I propose a better solution.
For starters, all ugly women should be turned into ground meat and shipped to impoverished countries as foreign aid to strengthen our relations with other countries.
Following this, we lobotomize the remaining women and keep them as part of public property, like national parks or libraries. Thus very man can rent his own slut, be it for sex or breeding purposes, and return her to the slut repository to be used once more.

 

[Inanimate Pragmatist]

water

 

[nomi]

Statistically speaking women were better off in the 1930s and 1950s when I didn’t have as many rights as they do now when they didn’t have dating app and a thousand different options for men that’s why most are brainless hypergamy foids that can’t think for themselves and only want men that are completely out of their league it’s insane how they think they’re worth and man 6ft and above simply because they are women.

n*****s like this prove the human species is devolving

 

[Nenestar]

Is it the new meta to create alts and make AIs write ragebait threads?

 

[ragebait77]

Is it the new meta to create alts and make AIs write ragebait threads?

The brainless misogynist method remains unpatched to this day

 

[Vitrokea]

I propose a better solution.
For starters, all ugly women should be turned into ground meat and shipped to impoverished countries as foreign aid to strengthen our relations with other countries.
Following this, we lobotomize the remaining women and keep them as part of public property, like national parks or libraries. Thus very man can rent his own slut, be it for sex or breeding purposes, and return her to the slut repository to be used once more.

Holy shit this is a good idea

 

[Vitrokea]

giving women rights and the ability to work jobs beyond nurse/teacher/etc destroyed society

Men can do it and they always do it better lamo

 

[eternal love]

giving women rights and the ability to work jobs beyond nurse/teacher/etc destroyed society

they shouldn't work as teachers

 

[eternal love]

Men can do it and they always do it better lamo

men are better at everything.

 

[Deleted Member 106619]

they shouldn't work as teachers

It’s fine for schoolchildren so long as the curriculum is designed by men and enforced rigorously. They should be barred from teaching at the university level for the obvious reasons.

 

[Vitrokea]

The brainless misogynist method remains unpatched to this day

Said by a fat ugly femoid who thinks she deserves and 6ft+ man lmaooo

 

[eternal love]

The brainless misogynist method remains unpatched to this day

misogyny is good

 

[stupid usernames]

water but true

 

[ragebait77]

Said by a fat ugly femoid who thinks she deserves and 6ft+ man lmaooo

This is funny you think your so high iq for the quantity amount of words you use in your sentences, all you said in reality was that foids should have no rights due to hypergamy seen in dating apps. Which in reality, a very small percentage of adults actually use dating apps on a daily basis. A bigger percentage of users being men

 

[Xoogster]

Banned for the truth.

 

[Deleted Member 46433]

“you would’ve done the same” dodges the point. Women in the 1930s–50s didn’t have more leverage, they had fewer choices and fewer rights. That isn’t being “better off,” it’s being constrained. Dating apps didn’t create unrealistic standards they just made preferences visible, on both sides. And judging half the population as incapable of thinking for themselves isn’t an argument, it’s just frustration dressed up as certainty.

ai