Join 65,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Info A possible sequence for female archetypes

giga.mia

#FCC comrade
Contributor
Reputable ★★★
Established ★★
Joined
Aug 14, 2025
Messages
9,796
Solutions
11
Time Online
1mo 1d
Reputation
34,303
Location
Mothers basement
Least dimo -> most dimo

Ogress, ladette, feminal ladette, beautiful, princess, bimbo

Throughout the years, a spectrum for male archetypes was founded and it displayed a comprehensive scale on the most common male archetypes. Ranging from the cutecel, pretty boy, robust pretty boy, handsome, dom, and ogre. (Sometimes people use different names for those archetypes). It’s been around for a long time and many utilize it to have a better understanding of what archetype their looks fall into.

But nobody has ever established a scale for the female archetypes, ranging from least to most dimorphic. Even though this forum includes women, we have a lack of threads on “female lookism”. So I thought I’d go ahead and create this for the hell of it. The first and last archetype are the most unattractive, so you’d normally want to fall somewhere in the middle.

Of course, for women many things vary. With the notion that women have “infinite smv”, I don’t think it’s necessary for me to write down much about who these archetypes attract.

The one thing I wrote that I’m very unsure about is my guestimations for their prime ages (mine are all over the place). Prime ages as in the time window in which they keep their looks preserved in. I never claimed to be good at guestimations, so if you guys have better ones I’ll definitely change them.

Ogress

IMG_1252.jpeg


An ogress is the female version of an ogre. It’s the archetype with the lowest possible dimorphism, typically characterized by freakishly long midfaces, big noses, and other features that are not seen as feminine. They usually have poor skin quality and messy hair, and excess body fat. This one is definitely the least popular female archetype, and is usually only seen single or dating other people on their tier.

The best you can do if you have this archetype, is hardmaxx to try and achieve a more feminine face. Whether it’s bone shaving, a canthoplasty, a rhino, or all of those.

Prime age: 15-20 (the older you are, the more you grow into your face. The ogress is unappealing no matter what age).
Giveaways: excess bone mass, masculine/boxy jaw, big nose, neutral/negative canthal tilt, long midface, square hairline

Ladette/tomboy

IMG_1263.jpeg


Ladettes tend to share tiny similarities with the ogress (like a masculine eye area or jaw), but not enough to be seen as entirely unattractive. They lean more on the androgynous side, and have a mysterious ambience to them. I chose this name because ladette is another word for tomboy. These women are usually are on the taller side, and some are gymmaxxed.

If you have this archetype and you’re a lesbian, you’ll be very seen as very appealing in that dating pool. If you’re straight, avoid working out parts of your body that will masculinize you. Pay attention to those glutes and thighs sister

Prime age: 16-30. Staying in good health is a huge part of what keeps this archetype desirable, most of the models I’ve seen with this archetype keep their looks for a while.
Giveaways: strong jaw, wider mouth, strong brow bone, masculine fwhr, no uee

Feminal ladette

IMG_1253.jpeg


A feminal ladette is on the more feminine leaning side of a ladette. Ladettes who have faces that are harmonious with a wider variety of feminine features fall here. Bodies that are more more dimorphic is another key feature that sets them apart from your typical ladette. They can attract a wide variety of men as well as women, and usually wind up in great relationships. They are generally taken more seriously as individuals because of their assertive demeanor, but their subtle feminine appeal still adds a playful charm to them. The line between this archetype, and the beautiful archetype is fairly thin.

Prime: 16-28.
Giveaways: neutral-slightly positive canthal tilt, full cheekbones, fuller lips, ideal midface, thick brows, higher nasal bridge

Beautiful

IMG_1254.jpeg


This archetype represents the majority of female models that are popularized in this community. With a beautiful blend of masculine and feminine features, their dimorphism lands in mid-high territory; while the ladette and the ogre lean more on the low dimorphism side. These women often have striking eye areas, prominent cheekbones and full lips. With their unmatched seduction, they replicate the femme fatale archetype. Their bodies are usually more voluptuous and curvy, but some are slimmer than others. These women have timeless beauty and are attractive to mostly everyone.

Prime: 18-30. These women usually posses traits that can slow the aging process down like full cheeks, defined jaws, and good eye support.
Giveaways: neutral-positive canthal tilt, full prominent cheekbones, full lips, ideal midface, tall lower third, weaker brow bone

Princess

IMG_1255.jpeg


Princesses are the symbols of high dimorphism. This archetype exhibits hyper femininity, kindness, and connotations of innocence. Often characterized by small midfaces, plump lips, and tiny noses; princesses, are usually seen to have youthful, neotenous faces. Slimmer and frailer bodies as well. With male cutecels on the other hand, the reason many believe their attractiveness tanks as they get older is because they can’t “stay cute forever”. So it’s a mystery how long a princess’s charm can truly last. Their neotenous complexion appeals to many people, but undoubtedly pedophiles.

Prime: 16-25. It really depends if you’ll be able to stay cute forever..
Giveaways: short midface, big round eyes, baby face fat, small nose, short philtrum, weaker jaw, ideal-wider set ipd

Bimbo

IMG_1256.webp


“Too much” dimorphism can be seen as quite repulsive in both genders. But nonetheless, there will still be people attracted to this archetype by the end of the day. The bimbo archetype is hyper dimorphic and bubbly. It’s characterized by basically every patriarchal stereotype against women and is inherently viewed as whorish. Bimbos usually gain respect from other women in the “girls support girls” aspect, but are not taken quite seriously by men. The primal audience they attract are men with porn addictions, narcissists, and people with other mental complications.

Prime: 18-21. A super hyper feminine face like this is bound to tank in attractiveness early. I also associate bimbos with botched women, and people who are botched age like shit and look older way quicker.
Giveaways: high set brows, duck lips, positive canthal tilt, overdone plastic surgery, tiny nose, boneless

(One again, I apologize if my prime guestimations are way off)

I just thought it’d be interesting to create a chart for women. Any thoughts on this? Anything I should add/tweak? Which archetype is your favorite?
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
imma actually try to remember some of them, there should be more archtypes though. this was fun to read, good thread
 
Least dimo -> most dimo

Ogress, ladette, feminal ladette, beautiful, princess, bimbo

Throughout the years, a spectrum for male archetypes was founded and it displayed a comprehensive scale on the most common male archetypes. Ranging from the cutecel, pretty boy, robust pretty boy, handsome, dom, and ogre. (Sometimes people use different names for those archetypes). It’s been around for a long time and many utilize it to have a better understanding of what archetype their looks fall into.

But nobody has ever established a scale for the female archetypes, ranging from least to most dimorphic. Even though this forum includes women, we have a lack of threads on “female lookism”. So I thought I’d go ahead and create this for the hell of it. The first and last archetype are the most unattractive, so you’d normally want to fall somewhere in the middle.

Of course, for women many things vary. With the notion that women have “infinite smv”, I don’t think it’s necessary for me to write down much about who these archetypes attract.

The one thing I wrote that I’m very unsure about is my guestimations for their prime ages (mine are all over the place). Prime ages as in the time window in which they keep their looks preserved in. I never claimed to be good at guestimations, so if you guys have better ones I’ll definitely change them.

Ogress

View attachment 248912

An ogress is the female version of an ogre. It’s the archetype with the lowest possible dimorphism, typically characterized by freakishly long midfaces, big noses, and other features that are not seen as feminine. They usually have poor skin quality and messy hair, and excess body fat. This one is definitely the least popular female archetype, and is usually only seen single or dating other people on their tier.

The best you can do if you have this archetype, is hardmaxx to try and achieve a more feminine face. Whether it’s bone shaving, a canthoplasty, a rhino, or all of those.

Prime age: 15-20 (the older you are, the more you grow into your face. The ogress is unappealing no matter what age).
Giveaways: excess bone mass, masculine/boxy jaw, big nose, neutral/negative canthal tilt, long midface, square hairline

Ladette/tomboy

View attachment 248913

Ladettes tend to share tiny similarities with the ogress (like a masculine eye area or jaw), but not enough to be seen as entirely unattractive. They lean more on the androgynous side, and have a mysterious ambience to them. I chose this name because ladette is another word for tomboy. These women are usually are on the taller side, and some are gymmaxxed.

If you have this archetype and you’re a lesbian, you’ll be very seen as very appealing in that dating pool. If you’re straight, avoid working out parts of your body that will masculinize you. Pay attention to those glutes and thighs sister

Prime age: 16-30. Staying in good health is a huge part of what keeps this archetype desirable, most of the models I’ve seen with this archetype keep their looks for a while.
Giveaways: strong jaw, wider mouth, strong brow bone, masculine fwhr, no uee

Feminal ladette

View attachment 248915

A feminal ladette is on the more feminine leaning side of a ladette. Ladettes who have faces that are harmonious with a wider variety of feminine features fall here. Bodies that are more more dimorphic is another key feature that sets them apart from your typical ladette. They can attract a wide variety of men as well as women, and usually wind up in great relationships. They are generally taken more seriously as individuals because of their assertive demeanor, but their subtle feminine appeal still adds a playful charm to them. The line between this archetype, and the beautiful archetype is fairly thin.

Prime: 16-28.
Giveaways: neutral-slightly positive canthal tilt, full cheekbones, fuller lips, ideal midface, thick brows, higher nasal bridge

Beautiful

View attachment 248917

This archetype represents the majority of female models that are popularized in this community. With a beautiful blend of masculine and feminine features, their dimorphism lands in mid-high territory; while the ladette and the ogre lean more on the low dimorphism side. These women often have striking eye areas, prominent cheekbones and full lips. With their unmatched seduction, they replicate the femme fatale archetype. Their bodies are usually more voluptuous and curvy, but some are slimmer than others. These women have timeless beauty and are attractive to mostly everyone.

Prime: 18-30. These women usually posses traits that can slow the aging process down like full cheeks, defined jaws, and good eye support.
Giveaways: neutral-positive canthal tilt, full prominent cheekbones, full lips, ideal midface, tall lower third, weaker brow bone

Princess

View attachment 248920

Princesses are the symbols of high dimorphism. This archetype exhibits hyper femininity, kindness, and connotations of innocence. Often characterized by small midfaces, plump lips, and tiny noses; princesses, are usually seen to have youthful, neotenous faces. Slimmer and frailer bodies as well. With male cutecels on the other hand, the reason many believe their attractiveness tanks as they get older is because they can’t “stay cute forever”. So it’s a mystery how long a princess’s charm can truly last. Their neotenous complexion appeals to many people, but undoubtedly pedophiles.

Prime: 16-25. It really depends if you’ll be able to stay cute forever..
Giveaways: short midface, big round eyes, baby face fat, small nose, short philtrum, weaker jaw, ideal-wider set ipd

Bimbo

View attachment 248921

“Too much” dimorphism can be seen as quite repulsive in both genders. But nonetheless, there will still be people attracted to this archetype by the end of the day. The bimbo archetype is hyper dimorphic and bubbly. It’s characterized by basically every patriarchal stereotype against women and is inherently viewed as whorish. Bimbos usually gain respect from other women in the “girls support girls” aspect, but are not taken quite seriously by men. The primal audience they attract are men with porn addictions, narcissists, and people with other mental complications.

Prime: 18-21. A super hyper feminine face like this is bound to tank in attractiveness early. I also associate bimbos with botched women, and people who are botched age like shit and look older way quicker.
Giveaways: high set brows, duck lips, positive canthal tilt, overdone plastic surgery, tiny nose, boneless

(One again, I apologize if my prime guestimations are way off)

I just thought it’d be interesting to create a chart for women. Any thoughts on this? Anything I should add/tweak? Which archetype is your favorite?
Does that make me a raging homosexual if I think the ladette and feminine ladette examples shown are the most attractive ?
 
Does that make me a raging homosexual if I think the ladette and feminine ladette examples shown are the most attractive ?
Not at all lol, the ogress and the bimbo are the most outright unattractive. Plus we all just fw different things
 
Least dimo -> most dimo

Ogress, ladette, feminal ladette, beautiful, princess, bimbo

Throughout the years, a spectrum for male archetypes was founded and it displayed a comprehensive scale on the most common male archetypes. Ranging from the cutecel, pretty boy, robust pretty boy, handsome, dom, and ogre. (Sometimes people use different names for those archetypes). It’s been around for a long time and many utilize it to have a better understanding of what archetype their looks fall into.

But nobody has ever established a scale for the female archetypes, ranging from least to most dimorphic. Even though this forum includes women, we have a lack of threads on “female lookism”. So I thought I’d go ahead and create this for the hell of it. The first and last archetype are the most unattractive, so you’d normally want to fall somewhere in the middle.

Of course, for women many things vary. With the notion that women have “infinite smv”, I don’t think it’s necessary for me to write down much about who these archetypes attract.

The one thing I wrote that I’m very unsure about is my guestimations for their prime ages (mine are all over the place). Prime ages as in the time window in which they keep their looks preserved in. I never claimed to be good at guestimations, so if you guys have better ones I’ll definitely change them.

Ogress

View attachment 248912

An ogress is the female version of an ogre. It’s the archetype with the lowest possible dimorphism, typically characterized by freakishly long midfaces, big noses, and other features that are not seen as feminine. They usually have poor skin quality and messy hair, and excess body fat. This one is definitely the least popular female archetype, and is usually only seen single or dating other people on their tier.

The best you can do if you have this archetype, is hardmaxx to try and achieve a more feminine face. Whether it’s bone shaving, a canthoplasty, a rhino, or all of those.

Prime age: 15-20 (the older you are, the more you grow into your face. The ogress is unappealing no matter what age).
Giveaways: excess bone mass, masculine/boxy jaw, big nose, neutral/negative canthal tilt, long midface, square hairline

Ladette/tomboy

View attachment 248913

Ladettes tend to share tiny similarities with the ogress (like a masculine eye area or jaw), but not enough to be seen as entirely unattractive. They lean more on the androgynous side, and have a mysterious ambience to them. I chose this name because ladette is another word for tomboy. These women are usually are on the taller side, and some are gymmaxxed.

If you have this archetype and you’re a lesbian, you’ll be very seen as very appealing in that dating pool. If you’re straight, avoid working out parts of your body that will masculinize you. Pay attention to those glutes and thighs sister

Prime age: 16-30. Staying in good health is a huge part of what keeps this archetype desirable, most of the models I’ve seen with this archetype keep their looks for a while.
Giveaways: strong jaw, wider mouth, strong brow bone, masculine fwhr, no uee

Feminal ladette

View attachment 248915

A feminal ladette is on the more feminine leaning side of a ladette. Ladettes who have faces that are harmonious with a wider variety of feminine features fall here. Bodies that are more more dimorphic is another key feature that sets them apart from your typical ladette. They can attract a wide variety of men as well as women, and usually wind up in great relationships. They are generally taken more seriously as individuals because of their assertive demeanor, but their subtle feminine appeal still adds a playful charm to them. The line between this archetype, and the beautiful archetype is fairly thin.

Prime: 16-28.
Giveaways: neutral-slightly positive canthal tilt, full cheekbones, fuller lips, ideal midface, thick brows, higher nasal bridge

Beautiful

View attachment 248917

This archetype represents the majority of female models that are popularized in this community. With a beautiful blend of masculine and feminine features, their dimorphism lands in mid-high territory; while the ladette and the ogre lean more on the low dimorphism side. These women often have striking eye areas, prominent cheekbones and full lips. With their unmatched seduction, they replicate the femme fatale archetype. Their bodies are usually more voluptuous and curvy, but some are slimmer than others. These women have timeless beauty and are attractive to mostly everyone.

Prime: 18-30. These women usually posses traits that can slow the aging process down like full cheeks, defined jaws, and good eye support.
Giveaways: neutral-positive canthal tilt, full prominent cheekbones, full lips, ideal midface, tall lower third, weaker brow bone

Princess

View attachment 248920

Princesses are the symbols of high dimorphism. This archetype exhibits hyper femininity, kindness, and connotations of innocence. Often characterized by small midfaces, plump lips, and tiny noses; princesses, are usually seen to have youthful, neotenous faces. Slimmer and frailer bodies as well. With male cutecels on the other hand, the reason many believe their attractiveness tanks as they get older is because they can’t “stay cute forever”. So it’s a mystery how long a princess’s charm can truly last. Their neotenous complexion appeals to many people, but undoubtedly pedophiles.

Prime: 16-25. It really depends if you’ll be able to stay cute forever..
Giveaways: short midface, big round eyes, baby face fat, small nose, short philtrum, weaker jaw, ideal-wider set ipd

Bimbo

View attachment 248921

“Too much” dimorphism can be seen as quite repulsive in both genders. But nonetheless, there will still be people attracted to this archetype by the end of the day. The bimbo archetype is hyper dimorphic and bubbly. It’s characterized by basically every patriarchal stereotype against women and is inherently viewed as whorish. Bimbos usually gain respect from other women in the “girls support girls” aspect, but are not taken quite seriously by men. The primal audience they attract are men with porn addictions, narcissists, and people with other mental complications.

Prime: 18-21. A super hyper feminine face like this is bound to tank in attractiveness early. I also associate bimbos with botched women, and people who are botched age like shit and look older way quicker.
Giveaways: high set brows, duck lips, positive canthal tilt, overdone plastic surgery, tiny nose, boneless

(One again, I apologize if my prime guestimations are way off)

I just thought it’d be interesting to create a chart for women. Any thoughts on this? Anything I should add/tweak? Which archetype is your favorite?
1766959445255.webp


Op doxxed
 
Least dimo -> most dimo

Ogress, ladette, feminal ladette, beautiful, princess, bimbo

Throughout the years, a spectrum for male archetypes was founded and it displayed a comprehensive scale on the most common male archetypes. Ranging from the cutecel, pretty boy, robust pretty boy, handsome, dom, and ogre. (Sometimes people use different names for those archetypes). It’s been around for a long time and many utilize it to have a better understanding of what archetype their looks fall into.

But nobody has ever established a scale for the female archetypes, ranging from least to most dimorphic. Even though this forum includes women, we have a lack of threads on “female lookism”. So I thought I’d go ahead and create this for the hell of it. The first and last archetype are the most unattractive, so you’d normally want to fall somewhere in the middle.

Of course, for women many things vary. With the notion that women have “infinite smv”, I don’t think it’s necessary for me to write down much about who these archetypes attract.

The one thing I wrote that I’m very unsure about is my guestimations for their prime ages (mine are all over the place). Prime ages as in the time window in which they keep their looks preserved in. I never claimed to be good at guestimations, so if you guys have better ones I’ll definitely change them.

Ogress

View attachment 248912

An ogress is the female version of an ogre. It’s the archetype with the lowest possible dimorphism, typically characterized by freakishly long midfaces, big noses, and other features that are not seen as feminine. They usually have poor skin quality and messy hair, and excess body fat. This one is definitely the least popular female archetype, and is usually only seen single or dating other people on their tier.

The best you can do if you have this archetype, is hardmaxx to try and achieve a more feminine face. Whether it’s bone shaving, a canthoplasty, a rhino, or all of those.

Prime age: 15-20 (the older you are, the more you grow into your face. The ogress is unappealing no matter what age).
Giveaways: excess bone mass, masculine/boxy jaw, big nose, neutral/negative canthal tilt, long midface, square hairline

Ladette/tomboy

View attachment 248913

Ladettes tend to share tiny similarities with the ogress (like a masculine eye area or jaw), but not enough to be seen as entirely unattractive. They lean more on the androgynous side, and have a mysterious ambience to them. I chose this name because ladette is another word for tomboy. These women are usually are on the taller side, and some are gymmaxxed.

If you have this archetype and you’re a lesbian, you’ll be very seen as very appealing in that dating pool. If you’re straight, avoid working out parts of your body that will masculinize you. Pay attention to those glutes and thighs sister

Prime age: 16-30. Staying in good health is a huge part of what keeps this archetype desirable, most of the models I’ve seen with this archetype keep their looks for a while.
Giveaways: strong jaw, wider mouth, strong brow bone, masculine fwhr, no uee

Feminal ladette

View attachment 248915

A feminal ladette is on the more feminine leaning side of a ladette. Ladettes who have faces that are harmonious with a wider variety of feminine features fall here. Bodies that are more more dimorphic is another key feature that sets them apart from your typical ladette. They can attract a wide variety of men as well as women, and usually wind up in great relationships. They are generally taken more seriously as individuals because of their assertive demeanor, but their subtle feminine appeal still adds a playful charm to them. The line between this archetype, and the beautiful archetype is fairly thin.

Prime: 16-28.
Giveaways: neutral-slightly positive canthal tilt, full cheekbones, fuller lips, ideal midface, thick brows, higher nasal bridge

Beautiful

View attachment 248917

This archetype represents the majority of female models that are popularized in this community. With a beautiful blend of masculine and feminine features, their dimorphism lands in mid-high territory; while the ladette and the ogre lean more on the low dimorphism side. These women often have striking eye areas, prominent cheekbones and full lips. With their unmatched seduction, they replicate the femme fatale archetype. Their bodies are usually more voluptuous and curvy, but some are slimmer than others. These women have timeless beauty and are attractive to mostly everyone.

Prime: 18-30. These women usually posses traits that can slow the aging process down like full cheeks, defined jaws, and good eye support.
Giveaways: neutral-positive canthal tilt, full prominent cheekbones, full lips, ideal midface, tall lower third, weaker brow bone

Princess

View attachment 248920

Princesses are the symbols of high dimorphism. This archetype exhibits hyper femininity, kindness, and connotations of innocence. Often characterized by small midfaces, plump lips, and tiny noses; princesses, are usually seen to have youthful, neotenous faces. Slimmer and frailer bodies as well. With male cutecels on the other hand, the reason many believe their attractiveness tanks as they get older is because they can’t “stay cute forever”. So it’s a mystery how long a princess’s charm can truly last. Their neotenous complexion appeals to many people, but undoubtedly pedophiles.

Prime: 16-25. It really depends if you’ll be able to stay cute forever..
Giveaways: short midface, big round eyes, baby face fat, small nose, short philtrum, weaker jaw, ideal-wider set ipd

Bimbo

View attachment 248921

“Too much” dimorphism can be seen as quite repulsive in both genders. But nonetheless, there will still be people attracted to this archetype by the end of the day. The bimbo archetype is hyper dimorphic and bubbly. It’s characterized by basically every patriarchal stereotype against women and is inherently viewed as whorish. Bimbos usually gain respect from other women in the “girls support girls” aspect, but are not taken quite seriously by men. The primal audience they attract are men with porn addictions, narcissists, and people with other mental complications.

Prime: 18-21. A super hyper feminine face like this is bound to tank in attractiveness early. I also associate bimbos with botched women, and people who are botched age like shit and look older way quicker.
Giveaways: high set brows, duck lips, positive canthal tilt, overdone plastic surgery, tiny nose, boneless

(One again, I apologize if my prime guestimations are way off)

I just thought it’d be interesting to create a chart for women. Any thoughts on this? Anything I should add/tweak? Which archetype is your favorite?
@nana is a bimbo
 
i think i am princess
 
Least dimo -> most dimo

Ogress, ladette, feminal ladette, beautiful, princess, bimbo

Throughout the years, a spectrum for male archetypes was founded and it displayed a comprehensive scale on the most common male archetypes. Ranging from the cutecel, pretty boy, robust pretty boy, handsome, dom, and ogre. (Sometimes people use different names for those archetypes). It’s been around for a long time and many utilize it to have a better understanding of what archetype their looks fall into.

But nobody has ever established a scale for the female archetypes, ranging from least to most dimorphic. Even though this forum includes women, we have a lack of threads on “female lookism”. So I thought I’d go ahead and create this for the hell of it. The first and last archetype are the most unattractive, so you’d normally want to fall somewhere in the middle.

Of course, for women many things vary. With the notion that women have “infinite smv”, I don’t think it’s necessary for me to write down much about who these archetypes attract.

The one thing I wrote that I’m very unsure about is my guestimations for their prime ages (mine are all over the place). Prime ages as in the time window in which they keep their looks preserved in. I never claimed to be good at guestimations, so if you guys have better ones I’ll definitely change them.

Ogress

View attachment 248912

An ogress is the female version of an ogre. It’s the archetype with the lowest possible dimorphism, typically characterized by freakishly long midfaces, big noses, and other features that are not seen as feminine. They usually have poor skin quality and messy hair, and excess body fat. This one is definitely the least popular female archetype, and is usually only seen single or dating other people on their tier.

The best you can do if you have this archetype, is hardmaxx to try and achieve a more feminine face. Whether it’s bone shaving, a canthoplasty, a rhino, or all of those.

Prime age: 15-20 (the older you are, the more you grow into your face. The ogress is unappealing no matter what age).
Giveaways: excess bone mass, masculine/boxy jaw, big nose, neutral/negative canthal tilt, long midface, square hairline

Ladette/tomboy

View attachment 248913

Ladettes tend to share tiny similarities with the ogress (like a masculine eye area or jaw), but not enough to be seen as entirely unattractive. They lean more on the androgynous side, and have a mysterious ambience to them. I chose this name because ladette is another word for tomboy. These women are usually are on the taller side, and some are gymmaxxed.

If you have this archetype and you’re a lesbian, you’ll be very seen as very appealing in that dating pool. If you’re straight, avoid working out parts of your body that will masculinize you. Pay attention to those glutes and thighs sister

Prime age: 16-30. Staying in good health is a huge part of what keeps this archetype desirable, most of the models I’ve seen with this archetype keep their looks for a while.
Giveaways: strong jaw, wider mouth, strong brow bone, masculine fwhr, no uee

Feminal ladette

View attachment 248915

A feminal ladette is on the more feminine leaning side of a ladette. Ladettes who have faces that are harmonious with a wider variety of feminine features fall here. Bodies that are more more dimorphic is another key feature that sets them apart from your typical ladette. They can attract a wide variety of men as well as women, and usually wind up in great relationships. They are generally taken more seriously as individuals because of their assertive demeanor, but their subtle feminine appeal still adds a playful charm to them. The line between this archetype, and the beautiful archetype is fairly thin.

Prime: 16-28.
Giveaways: neutral-slightly positive canthal tilt, full cheekbones, fuller lips, ideal midface, thick brows, higher nasal bridge

Beautiful

View attachment 248917

This archetype represents the majority of female models that are popularized in this community. With a beautiful blend of masculine and feminine features, their dimorphism lands in mid-high territory; while the ladette and the ogre lean more on the low dimorphism side. These women often have striking eye areas, prominent cheekbones and full lips. With their unmatched seduction, they replicate the femme fatale archetype. Their bodies are usually more voluptuous and curvy, but some are slimmer than others. These women have timeless beauty and are attractive to mostly everyone.

Prime: 18-30. These women usually posses traits that can slow the aging process down like full cheeks, defined jaws, and good eye support.
Giveaways: neutral-positive canthal tilt, full prominent cheekbones, full lips, ideal midface, tall lower third, weaker brow bone

Princess

View attachment 248920

Princesses are the symbols of high dimorphism. This archetype exhibits hyper femininity, kindness, and connotations of innocence. Often characterized by small midfaces, plump lips, and tiny noses; princesses, are usually seen to have youthful, neotenous faces. Slimmer and frailer bodies as well. With male cutecels on the other hand, the reason many believe their attractiveness tanks as they get older is because they can’t “stay cute forever”. So it’s a mystery how long a princess’s charm can truly last. Their neotenous complexion appeals to many people, but undoubtedly pedophiles.

Prime: 16-25. It really depends if you’ll be able to stay cute forever..
Giveaways: short midface, big round eyes, baby face fat, small nose, short philtrum, weaker jaw, ideal-wider set ipd

Bimbo

View attachment 248921

“Too much” dimorphism can be seen as quite repulsive in both genders. But nonetheless, there will still be people attracted to this archetype by the end of the day. The bimbo archetype is hyper dimorphic and bubbly. It’s characterized by basically every patriarchal stereotype against women and is inherently viewed as whorish. Bimbos usually gain respect from other women in the “girls support girls” aspect, but are not taken quite seriously by men. The primal audience they attract are men with porn addictions, narcissists, and people with other mental complications.

Prime: 18-21. A super hyper feminine face like this is bound to tank in attractiveness early. I also associate bimbos with botched women, and people who are botched age like shit and look older way quicker.
Giveaways: high set brows, duck lips, positive canthal tilt, overdone plastic surgery, tiny nose, boneless

(One again, I apologize if my prime guestimations are way off)

I just thought it’d be interesting to create a chart for women. Any thoughts on this? Anything I should add/tweak? Which archetype is your favorite?
Tomboys rule
 
NEVER FUCKING MIND
 
Last edited:
i wanna be a bimbo doll
 
Least dimo -> most dimo

Ogress, ladette, feminal ladette, beautiful, princess, bimbo

Throughout the years, a spectrum for male archetypes was founded and it displayed a comprehensive scale on the most common male archetypes. Ranging from the cutecel, pretty boy, robust pretty boy, handsome, dom, and ogre. (Sometimes people use different names for those archetypes). It’s been around for a long time and many utilize it to have a better understanding of what archetype their looks fall into.

But nobody has ever established a scale for the female archetypes, ranging from least to most dimorphic. Even though this forum includes women, we have a lack of threads on “female lookism”. So I thought I’d go ahead and create this for the hell of it. The first and last archetype are the most unattractive, so you’d normally want to fall somewhere in the middle.

Of course, for women many things vary. With the notion that women have “infinite smv”, I don’t think it’s necessary for me to write down much about who these archetypes attract.

The one thing I wrote that I’m very unsure about is my guestimations for their prime ages (mine are all over the place). Prime ages as in the time window in which they keep their looks preserved in. I never claimed to be good at guestimations, so if you guys have better ones I’ll definitely change them.

Ogress

View attachment 248912

An ogress is the female version of an ogre. It’s the archetype with the lowest possible dimorphism, typically characterized by freakishly long midfaces, big noses, and other features that are not seen as feminine. They usually have poor skin quality and messy hair, and excess body fat. This one is definitely the least popular female archetype, and is usually only seen single or dating other people on their tier.

The best you can do if you have this archetype, is hardmaxx to try and achieve a more feminine face. Whether it’s bone shaving, a canthoplasty, a rhino, or all of those.

Prime age: 15-20 (the older you are, the more you grow into your face. The ogress is unappealing no matter what age).
Giveaways: excess bone mass, masculine/boxy jaw, big nose, neutral/negative canthal tilt, long midface, square hairline

Ladette/tomboy

View attachment 248913

Ladettes tend to share tiny similarities with the ogress (like a masculine eye area or jaw), but not enough to be seen as entirely unattractive. They lean more on the androgynous side, and have a mysterious ambience to them. I chose this name because ladette is another word for tomboy. These women are usually are on the taller side, and some are gymmaxxed.

If you have this archetype and you’re a lesbian, you’ll be very seen as very appealing in that dating pool. If you’re straight, avoid working out parts of your body that will masculinize you. Pay attention to those glutes and thighs sister

Prime age: 16-30. Staying in good health is a huge part of what keeps this archetype desirable, most of the models I’ve seen with this archetype keep their looks for a while.
Giveaways: strong jaw, wider mouth, strong brow bone, masculine fwhr, no uee

Feminal ladette

View attachment 248915

A feminal ladette is on the more feminine leaning side of a ladette. Ladettes who have faces that are harmonious with a wider variety of feminine features fall here. Bodies that are more more dimorphic is another key feature that sets them apart from your typical ladette. They can attract a wide variety of men as well as women, and usually wind up in great relationships. They are generally taken more seriously as individuals because of their assertive demeanor, but their subtle feminine appeal still adds a playful charm to them. The line between this archetype, and the beautiful archetype is fairly thin.

Prime: 16-28.
Giveaways: neutral-slightly positive canthal tilt, full cheekbones, fuller lips, ideal midface, thick brows, higher nasal bridge

Beautiful

View attachment 248917

This archetype represents the majority of female models that are popularized in this community. With a beautiful blend of masculine and feminine features, their dimorphism lands in mid-high territory; while the ladette and the ogre lean more on the low dimorphism side. These women often have striking eye areas, prominent cheekbones and full lips. With their unmatched seduction, they replicate the femme fatale archetype. Their bodies are usually more voluptuous and curvy, but some are slimmer than others. These women have timeless beauty and are attractive to mostly everyone.

Prime: 18-30. These women usually posses traits that can slow the aging process down like full cheeks, defined jaws, and good eye support.
Giveaways: neutral-positive canthal tilt, full prominent cheekbones, full lips, ideal midface, tall lower third, weaker brow bone

Princess

View attachment 248920

Princesses are the symbols of high dimorphism. This archetype exhibits hyper femininity, kindness, and connotations of innocence. Often characterized by small midfaces, plump lips, and tiny noses; princesses, are usually seen to have youthful, neotenous faces. Slimmer and frailer bodies as well. With male cutecels on the other hand, the reason many believe their attractiveness tanks as they get older is because they can’t “stay cute forever”. So it’s a mystery how long a princess’s charm can truly last. Their neotenous complexion appeals to many people, but undoubtedly pedophiles.

Prime: 16-25. It really depends if you’ll be able to stay cute forever..
Giveaways: short midface, big round eyes, baby face fat, small nose, short philtrum, weaker jaw, ideal-wider set ipd

Bimbo

View attachment 248921

“Too much” dimorphism can be seen as quite repulsive in both genders. But nonetheless, there will still be people attracted to this archetype by the end of the day. The bimbo archetype is hyper dimorphic and bubbly. It’s characterized by basically every patriarchal stereotype against women and is inherently viewed as whorish. Bimbos usually gain respect from other women in the “girls support girls” aspect, but are not taken quite seriously by men. The primal audience they attract are men with porn addictions, narcissists, and people with other mental complications.

Prime: 18-21. A super hyper feminine face like this is bound to tank in attractiveness early. I also associate bimbos with botched women, and people who are botched age like shit and look older way quicker.
Giveaways: high set brows, duck lips, positive canthal tilt, overdone plastic surgery, tiny nose, boneless

(One again, I apologize if my prime guestimations are way off)

I just thought it’d be interesting to create a chart for women. Any thoughts on this? Anything I should add/tweak? Which archetype is your favorite?
Decent thread but it doesn't seems like you're comparing dimorphism, its more like you've created different labels for various archetypes.

Ogress doesn't mean to be ugly , it meant to be more masc dimorphism in appealing way, some one like Anja winkelmann would be a good example of it.
 
Decent thread but it doesn't seems like you're comparing dimorphism, its more like you've created different labels for various archetypes.

Ogress doesn't mean to be ugly , it meant to be more masc dimorphism in appealing way, some one like Anja winkelmann would be a good example of it.
I see ur point, I’ll go in an try and edit this tmrw. I personally believe anja winkelmann fits more of the ladette archetype because of her slim nose, pct, full lips etc! Ogress and Lafette share similarities
 
Last edited:
I see ur point, I’ll go in an try and edit this tmrw. I personally believe anja winkelmann fits more of the ladette archetype because of her slim nose, pct, full lips and other feminine features!
I think I would disagree on this. If we're comparing dimorphism then we couldn't ignore overall zygomatic & maxillary bone development + wide & outward growing mandible is a big masc dimorphism trait which Anja has. And the girl in ladette which you've posted is now way near the dimorphism of Anja.
 
I think I would disagree on this. If we're comparing dimorphism then we couldn't ignore overall zygomatic & maxillary bone development + wide & outward growing mandible is a big masc dimorphism trait which Anja has. And the girl in ladette which you've posted is now way near the dimorphism of Anja.
For reference, this is a clearer photo of the girl from the ladette example (euginua volodiva) she’s known to have a pretty masculine face
56DA4540-FF77-4820-A1C5-EF59EA4FE060.webp

Would you say she’s less dimorphic or more dimorphic than anja? She has masculine facial structure, the square/outward growing mandible you referenced
BFC18A3B-DB8D-4FD2-9673-A32A0F77705B.webp

now that I think about it, I feel like she’d probably fit the ogress more
 
Now that I think about it, I feel like she’d probably fit the ogress more
Agreed.

I don't have to explain anything, just look at the bone mass difference & zygomatic area development. + Chin Projection & philtrum ratio.
1000017124.webp
1000017126.webp

Both could be considered as ogress
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top