Join 70,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!
Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.
i meant that i wont discuss whether gender is a social construct or not, but instead of saying gender i said biological sex to impply what my opinion was, i guess It wasnt very clear what i meant. i believe a persons sex alr determines their gender, identity, social roles etc
religious belief btw
Even if u don’t believe in the existence of trans people it doesn’t change the fact that gender is a social construct, gender expression and social roles r made by society and are man made,making them social constructs
what i said is a religious belief? If It is, whats the issue
It doesn’t even change the opinion that gender is a social construct aswell jfl
What are you doing? Seriously. Take a step back, get some air, some sun on your head.
gender roles arent really manmade, in nature there are "gender roles" which are pretty similar to how i think things should be
u said Its a religious belief like its an issue, im asking what about It...
You should take my advice before you eat rubber
why cant u answer my question n****r
Ideas of femininity and masculinity don’t exist in nature.Neither do gender roles,you just are biological a man and biological a woman.This is clear because gender roles and gender expression,ideas of what’s feminine and masculine change depending on culture and even time period so clearly it is not biological but instead man made
in nature, mens physical strenght allowed them to hunt, protect the group etc. women would take care of their kids, breastfeed etc, which led to them staying in their home base more where they also gathered plants and did other stuff. how can u say sex roles are manmade
And that is not ideas of what femininity and masculinity are,explain how dresses are girly or the colour pink or certain music taste,makeup for example are biological ideas lol, also when those things were done (hunting or child caring) at that time they weren’t seen as making you more lady or man like it was just playing with your strengths.Women would hunt when needed or if it played with their strengths at that moment.In modern day society where men don’t hunt what’s your argument on gender roles??
i think they are but alright. n***a dresses and makeup are manmade, how could they be biological ideas? im saying gender roles (girls staying at home, men providing etc) arent manmade because thats how It is in nature. and yes they would hunt when NEEDED, what esle would they do? starve to death?
You put this elegantly not even trying to circle jerk. I never thought about it like playing strengths, but it makes a ton of sense.
Are u mistaking sex differences to gender
thank you
people forget people did to optimise survival for themselves and their offspring’s,which includes just playing based off your natural strengths.
thats ur opinion
it still doesn’t change that race is a social construct, the idea of race didn’t even exist before the 16th century
people from different regions of the world are different in genetic traits, physical characteristics and many other things, its not a social construct but If u think It is idc, this is extremely boring and i wont reply anymore
Jst sigh bro,your vote counts the same as other people’s
jfl, ure nothing but a retarded libtard who thinks hes right, i wish it still was 1800 so n*****s like u wouldnt have the right to vote
Im a girl firstly,you also wouldnt have the right to vote then LOL,im not a liberal either.Im not engaging in discussion with you anymore since clearly you have a rock for a brain
ure a 80 IQ retarded sheboon with probably the worst takes ive seen on here, quite literally nobody agrees with u on this forum and u genuinely have the audacity and confidence to say that JFLL
Whatever u want to believe bro
I’m white bruh
race and genetical differences between different groups are real and measurable, aboriginals and subsaharan africans are completely different people
Studies show there is more genetic differences between in the race categories than in between races firstly,secondly race was made based of similar phenotypes,thirdly there is no distinct race genetic markers out there,and race categories (which was made by humans around the 16th century for multiple negative reasons ) have changed,for example Italians now being considered white but wouldn’t in the past
a real brother will never beef with goy ?
more genetic difference within races than between them is an irrelevant and misplaced point
That’s because they are from different ethnic groups not because they r from different races
not the point, you could pick a swedish group and make them go through the same tests, and they're always gonna ne closer to the Germans than to any African or east asian group
