so this morning after having my croissant and coffee from a nice French place nearby I opened .com
I proceed to see a thread written by @Ben07 saying how much of a mogger this thing is
Granted alot of fellows like @neymar And @Whitepill said that this weird looking mf doesn't mog and instead of trying to rebute neymars statement he then decides to attack his looks ? ( nice cope buddy) what's even funnier is that @dextermogin was super confused as why no girls were in the comments simping for this autist
Ofc no women are simping, this is the same level of retardation as tik tok fags saying asian people have natural hunter eyes ( same eyes as a Mongol btw)
Now what I really wanted to speak about is how people over estimate how many htn+ exist and what the average looks rating is.
I made the bell curve yesterday which I think describes quite accurately the looks distribution on the population
as you can see we have ltn mtn htn and cl + on the bottom (Apologies for bad writing). You can also see that the bell curve has a huge peak at mid ltn and drops drastically on the uglier side and also drastically on the right side but then tapers down.
I'd say the percentages go like
.1% are subhuman
80% give or take are ltn range to low mtn
29.5% are mtn range to low htn
.499% are htn
.00098% are cl
and
.00002% are chad
This is Australia ratings which is renowned in the looksmax sphere for having gl people
But I (consistently rated htn area) rarely find someone that mogs me facially on the street and have only seen enough cl+ to count on one hand
The average person IS NOT mtn
Just look on the street, MTN is NOT AVERAGE .
I proceed to see a thread written by @Ben07 saying how much of a mogger this thing is
Granted alot of fellows like @neymar And @Whitepill said that this weird looking mf doesn't mog and instead of trying to rebute neymars statement he then decides to attack his looks ? ( nice cope buddy) what's even funnier is that @dextermogin was super confused as why no girls were in the comments simping for this autist
Ofc no women are simping, this is the same level of retardation as tik tok fags saying asian people have natural hunter eyes ( same eyes as a Mongol btw)
Now what I really wanted to speak about is how people over estimate how many htn+ exist and what the average looks rating is.
I made the bell curve yesterday which I think describes quite accurately the looks distribution on the population
as you can see we have ltn mtn htn and cl + on the bottom (Apologies for bad writing). You can also see that the bell curve has a huge peak at mid ltn and drops drastically on the uglier side and also drastically on the right side but then tapers down.
I'd say the percentages go like
.1% are subhuman
80% give or take are ltn range to low mtn
29.5% are mtn range to low htn
.499% are htn
.00098% are cl
and
.00002% are chad
This is Australia ratings which is renowned in the looksmax sphere for having gl people
But I (consistently rated htn area) rarely find someone that mogs me facially on the street and have only seen enough cl+ to count on one hand
The average person IS NOT mtn
Just look on the street, MTN is NOT AVERAGE .
