An estimation of .com userbase IQ megathread

[Transposon]

First, a map (ChatGPT) :
70–79 (Borderline range)

• Roughly 6% of people.
• Cognitive processing is noticeably below average; abstract reasoning and complex problem-solving are challenging.
• People here can still live independently, but academic learning often requires strong structure and repetition.

80–89 (Low average)

• About 16% of people.
• Can handle daily life and most jobs competently. Abstract or theoretical concepts might feel frustrating or “foggy.”
• Tend to do better with concrete tasks than conceptual reasoning.

90–109 (Average)

• About 50% of people fall here.
• Capable of reasoning, learning, and understanding ideas of average complexity.
• The world is designed for this group — education systems, most professions, and social expectations are calibrated here.

110–119 (High average)

• Roughly 16% of people.
• Grasp abstract ideas faster, can strategize and connect patterns with less explicit instruction.
• Often called “bright,” though not necessarily “gifted.” They thrive in analytical or creative fields when motivated.

120–129 (Superior)

• Around 7% of the population.
• Often labeled as “gifted.” Capable of deep understanding, rapid learning, and advanced abstract thought.
• If curiosity and discipline match intelligence, they can excel in intellectually demanding fields.

130–144 (Highly gifted)

• About 2% of people.
• Very high reasoning ability and fast learning speed. They see relationships others miss, often creating their own conceptual frameworks.
• Prone to perfectionism or existential frustration if unstimulated. Many scientists, inventors, and polymaths fall here.

145+ (Exceptionally gifted / profoundly gifted)

• Less than 0.1% of people.
• Extremely fast and deep cognitive processing, sometimes to the point of struggling to relate socially or emotionally to peers.
• They can conceptualize systems-level ideas — physics, philosophy, or abstract mathematics — with near-instinctive clarity.
• Often have asynchronous development: mental maturity outpaces emotional grounding.
  Now..
  
  1. @lumen - 120-125. However, their most interesting aspect is the very high emotional intelligence, not readily captured by g.
  2. @Night - 105-115. Need, just a little more information
  3. @Rau Le Creuset - 125–129. From my discussions with him on anthropology, he can condense large amounts of information into clear, readable paragraphs. Shows real skill in distilling complexity.
  4. @vespertine - 110-119. Need a bit more to say. Seems capable, but interactions haven’t revealed much yet.
  5. @RAD - 115 - 125. Good at abstract reasoning. Thinks through problems logically, connects ideas well.
  6. @slopslinger - 115–125. A little reserved so conversations have been short. It could be so high because of wishful thinking from my end
  7. @over0 - 122.7. Impressive
  8. @apatheia - humble 123. Humble to the extent of being likeable
  9. @Genetics - 123. However, plagued by overthinking
  10. @johnfkennedy - humble 123. Quite articulate, almost all conversations have been fruitful
  11. @faithful - 105-113. Additionally, emotionally intelligent. Not readily captured by g
  12. @Lebensmude - 119 who thinks he's 130
  13. @rovea - Hidden and underrated 113
  14. @RRM67 - 95-100
  15. @Spuffy - very humble 121. Seen a few long responses from them. Handles abstract reasoning smoothly, articulate, and doesn’t get bogged down in unnecessary verbosity.
  16. @milkjar - 105-110 jail
  17. @hannah - 119 who thinks they're 138
  18. @Warden - humble 126. Most articulate user on forum in terms of their writing
  19. @tuberculosisinmybal - 110. Could absolutely be higher
  20. @Riggedahrage - 90-99
  21. @acketar - 119 who thinks he's 122.7
  22. @AuggyDauggy - 100 - 109
  23. @pompompurino - 100-109
  24. @Kaari - 100 - 109
  25. @Schizotypalcel - 115-119. Favourite forum philosopher
  26. @NewFuckingDay - hidden and humble 120. Another one for whom emotional intelligence dominates
  27. @Logicpilled - 119-?. Larping as you was quite fun.
  28. @limo8 - 100-105. Although very cute and likeable
  29. @giga.mia - 100- 105
  30. @Nbernical - 100 - 109
  31. @Casablanco - 100 - 109
  32. @BigDihDiddy - 90-99.
  33. @Darkeningstar - 130-135. If they indeed are pursuing a PHD in physics, it could be higher by just a couple more points. Yes, I know pursuing a PHD in and of itself is not indicative of intelligence since there are many more variables at play. Most importantly conscientiousness. I just feel it would be superfluous to give my reasoning here.
  A point that's completely off topic..
  Although, their writing is undeniably articulate, and their knowledge is definitely not all lie. I have, never in my life witnessed a person so arrogant and narcissistic about their intelligence. Their vanity and egregiousis solipsism is almost entertaining to watch
  34. @blanquita444 - 100 - 109
  35. @Stardust_ - 80-95. Such an interesting person to watch make sense of the world
  36. @RottingCarrie - 90-105.
  37. @huntergirl - 100- 109
  38. @TonyDr - 115 - 119. I loved reading his responses for the time he was here. Very similar to Randomized in terms of personality and writing.
  39. @Knight - 100 - 109
  39. @97baHater -125 -129. Interactions with him were pleasantly surprising. He falls down the pitfalls of black and white thinking often. Regardless, his fluency in scientific discussion is undeniable.
  40. @Jeezy - 95- 105
  41. @cindythetvisleaking - 100 - 109
  42. @SkinnyDennis - 149 silent guardian and observer
  43. @Striking_4 - 105-115
  44. @xy2m - 105- 109
  45. @Transposon - 119 who thinks he's 149
  
  
  Disclaimer : I apologize if you feel I’ve underestimated your IQ.
  Obviously, any analysis based on interactions is inherently limited. This thread is half sarcasm, half serious.
  If you think I’m wrong, chances are you’re right, since I probably am.​

 

[Blackpillirony]

First, a map (ChatGPT) :
70–79 (Borderline range)

• Roughly 6% of people.
• Cognitive processing is noticeably below average; abstract reasoning and complex problem-solving are challenging.
• People here can still live independently, but academic learning often requires strong structure and repetition.

80–89 (Low average)

• About 16% of people.
• Can handle daily life and most jobs competently. Abstract or theoretical concepts might feel frustrating or “foggy.”
• Tend to do better with concrete tasks than conceptual reasoning.

90–109 (Average)

• About 50% of people fall here.
• Capable of reasoning, learning, and understanding ideas of average complexity.
• The world is designed for this group — education systems, most professions, and social expectations are calibrated here.

110–119 (High average)

• Roughly 16% of people.
• Grasp abstract ideas faster, can strategize and connect patterns with less explicit instruction.
• Often called “bright,” though not necessarily “gifted.” They thrive in analytical or creative fields when motivated.

120–129 (Superior)

• Around 7% of the population.
• Often labeled as “gifted.” Capable of deep understanding, rapid learning, and advanced abstract thought.
• If curiosity and discipline match intelligence, they can excel in intellectually demanding fields.

130–144 (Highly gifted)

• About 2% of people.
• Very high reasoning ability and fast learning speed. They see relationships others miss, often creating their own conceptual frameworks.
• Prone to perfectionism or existential frustration if unstimulated. Many scientists, inventors, and polymaths fall here.

145+ (Exceptionally gifted / profoundly gifted)

• Less than 0.1% of people.
• Extremely fast and deep cognitive processing, sometimes to the point of struggling to relate socially or emotionally to peers.
• They can conceptualize systems-level ideas — physics, philosophy, or abstract mathematics — with near-instinctive clarity.
• Often have asynchronous development: mental maturity outpaces emotional grounding.
  Now..
  
  1. @lumen - 120-125. However, their most interesting aspect is very high emotional intelligence, not readily captured by g.
  2. @Night - 105-115. Need, just a little more information
  3. @Rau Le Creuset - 125–129. From my discussions with him on anthropology, can condense large amounts of information into clear, readable paragraphs. Shows real skill in distilling complexity.
  4. @vespertine - 110-119. Need a bit more to say. Seems capable, but interactions haven’t revealed much yet.
  5. @RAD - 115 - 125. Good at abstract reasoning. Thinks through problems logically, connects ideas well.
  6. @slopslinger - 115–125. A little reserved so conversations have been short. It could be so high because of wishful thinking from my end
  7. @over0 - 122.7. Impressive
  8. @apatheia - humble 123. Humble to the extent of being likeable
  9. @Genetics - 123. However, plagued by overthinking
  10. @johnfkennedy - humble 123. Quite articulate, almost all conversations have been fruitful
  11. @faithful - 105-113. Additionally, emotionally intelligent. Not readily captured by g
  12. @Lebensmude - 119 who thinks he's 130
  13. @rovea - Hidden and underrated 113
  14. @RRM67 - 95-100
  15. @Spuffy - very humble 121. Seen a few long responses from them. Handles abstract reasoning smoothly, articulate, and doesn’t get bogged down in unnecessary verbosity.
  16. @milkjar - 105-110 jail
  17. @hannah - 119 who thinks they're 138
  18. @Warden - humble 126. Most articulate user on forum in terms of their writing
  19. @tuberculosisinmybal - 110. Could absolutely be higher
  20. @Riggedahrage - 90-99
  21. @acketar - 119 who thinks he's 122.7
  22. @AuggyDauggy - 100 - 109
  23. @pompompurino - 100-109
  24. @Kaari - 100 - 109
  25. @Schizotypalcel - 115-119. Favourite forum philosopher
  26. @NewFuckingDay - hidden and humble 120. Another one for whom emotional intelligence dominates
  27. @Logicpilled - 119-?. Larping as you was quite fun.
  28. @limo8 - 100-105. Although very cute and likeable
  29. @giga.mia - 100- 105
  30. @Nbernical - 100 - 109
  31. @Casablanco - 100 - 109
  32. @BigDihDiddy - 90-99.
  33. @Darkeningstar - 130-135. If they indeed are pursuing a PHD in physics, it could be higher by just a couple more points. Yes, I know pursuing a PHD in and of itself is not indicative of intelligence since there are many more variables at play. Most importantly conscientiousness. I just feel it would be superfluous to give my reasoning here.
  A point that's completely off topic..
  Although, their writing is undeniably articulate, and their knowledge is definitely not all lie. I have, never in my life witnessed a person so arrogant and narcissistic about their intelligence. Their vanity and egregiousis solipsism is almost entertaining to watch
  34. @blanquita444 - 100 - 109
  35. @Stardust_ - 80-95. Such an interesting person to watch make sense of the world
  36. @RottingCarrie - 90-105.
  37. @huntergirl - 100- 109
  38. @TonyDr - 115 - 119. I loved reading his responses for the time he was here. Very similar to Randomized in terms of personality and writing.
  39. @Knight - 100 - 109
  39. @97baHater -125 -129. Interactions with him were pleasantly surprising. He falls down the pitfalls of black and white thinking often. Regardless, their fluency in scientific discussion is undeniable.
  40. @Jeezy - 95- 105
  41. @cindythetvisleaking - 100 - 109
  42. @SkinnyDennis - 149 silent guardian and observer
  43. @Striking_4 - 105-115
  44. @xy2m - 105- 109
  45. @Transposon - 119 who thinks he's 149​

No tag no care

 

[over0]

Not enough sub 100 scores tbh

 

[Night]

I see some biases here, but very good thread

 

[Casablanco]

First, a map (ChatGPT) :
70–79 (Borderline range)

• Roughly 6% of people.
• Cognitive processing is noticeably below average; abstract reasoning and complex problem-solving are challenging.
• People here can still live independently, but academic learning often requires strong structure and repetition.

80–89 (Low average)

• About 16% of people.
• Can handle daily life and most jobs competently. Abstract or theoretical concepts might feel frustrating or “foggy.”
• Tend to do better with concrete tasks than conceptual reasoning.

90–109 (Average)

• About 50% of people fall here.
• Capable of reasoning, learning, and understanding ideas of average complexity.
• The world is designed for this group — education systems, most professions, and social expectations are calibrated here.

110–119 (High average)

• Roughly 16% of people.
• Grasp abstract ideas faster, can strategize and connect patterns with less explicit instruction.
• Often called “bright,” though not necessarily “gifted.” They thrive in analytical or creative fields when motivated.

120–129 (Superior)

• Around 7% of the population.
• Often labeled as “gifted.” Capable of deep understanding, rapid learning, and advanced abstract thought.
• If curiosity and discipline match intelligence, they can excel in intellectually demanding fields.

130–144 (Highly gifted)

• About 2% of people.
• Very high reasoning ability and fast learning speed. They see relationships others miss, often creating their own conceptual frameworks.
• Prone to perfectionism or existential frustration if unstimulated. Many scientists, inventors, and polymaths fall here.

145+ (Exceptionally gifted / profoundly gifted)

• Less than 0.1% of people.
• Extremely fast and deep cognitive processing, sometimes to the point of struggling to relate socially or emotionally to peers.
• They can conceptualize systems-level ideas — physics, philosophy, or abstract mathematics — with near-instinctive clarity.
• Often have asynchronous development: mental maturity outpaces emotional grounding.
  Now..
  
  1. @lumen - 120-125. However, their most interesting aspect is the very high emotional intelligence, not readily captured by g.
  2. @Night - 105-115. Need, just a little more information
  3. @Rau Le Creuset - 125–129. From my discussions with him on anthropology, he can condense large amounts of information into clear, readable paragraphs. Shows real skill in distilling complexity.
  4. @vespertine - 110-119. Need a bit more to say. Seems capable, but interactions haven’t revealed much yet.
  5. @RAD - 115 - 125. Good at abstract reasoning. Thinks through problems logically, connects ideas well.
  6. @slopslinger - 115–125. A little reserved so conversations have been short. It could be so high because of wishful thinking from my end
  7. @over0 - 122.7. Impressive
  8. @apatheia - humble 123. Humble to the extent of being likeable
  9. @Genetics - 123. However, plagued by overthinking
  10. @johnfkennedy - humble 123. Quite articulate, almost all conversations have been fruitful
  11. @faithful - 105-113. Additionally, emotionally intelligent. Not readily captured by g
  12. @Lebensmude - 119 who thinks he's 130
  13. @rovea - Hidden and underrated 113
  14. @RRM67 - 95-100
  15. @Spuffy - very humble 121. Seen a few long responses from them. Handles abstract reasoning smoothly, articulate, and doesn’t get bogged down in unnecessary verbosity.
  16. @milkjar - 105-110 jail
  17. @hannah - 119 who thinks they're 138
  18. @Warden - humble 126. Most articulate user on forum in terms of their writing
  19. @tuberculosisinmybal - 110. Could absolutely be higher
  20. @Riggedahrage - 90-99
  21. @acketar - 119 who thinks he's 122.7
  22. @AuggyDauggy - 100 - 109
  23. @pompompurino - 100-109
  24. @Kaari - 100 - 109
  25. @Schizotypalcel - 115-119. Favourite forum philosopher
  26. @NewFuckingDay - hidden and humble 120. Another one for whom emotional intelligence dominates
  27. @Logicpilled - 119-?. Larping as you was quite fun.
  28. @limo8 - 100-105. Although very cute and likeable
  29. @giga.mia - 100- 105
  30. @Nbernical - 100 - 109
  31. @Casablanco - 100 - 109
  32. @BigDihDiddy - 90-99.
  33. @Darkeningstar - 130-135. If they indeed are pursuing a PHD in physics, it could be higher by just a couple more points. Yes, I know pursuing a PHD in and of itself is not indicative of intelligence since there are many more variables at play. Most importantly conscientiousness. I just feel it would be superfluous to give my reasoning here.
  A point that's completely off topic..
  Although, their writing is undeniably articulate, and their knowledge is definitely not all lie. I have, never in my life witnessed a person so arrogant and narcissistic about their intelligence. Their vanity and egregiousis solipsism is almost entertaining to watch
  34. @blanquita444 - 100 - 109
  35. @Stardust_ - 80-95. Such an interesting person to watch make sense of the world
  36. @RottingCarrie - 90-105.
  37. @huntergirl - 100- 109
  38. @TonyDr - 115 - 119. I loved reading his responses for the time he was here. Very similar to Randomized in terms of personality and writing.
  39. @Knight - 100 - 109
  39. @97baHater -125 -129. Interactions with him were pleasantly surprising. He falls down the pitfalls of black and white thinking often. Regardless, their fluency in scientific discussion is undeniable.
  40. @Jeezy - 95- 105
  41. @cindythetvisleaking - 100 - 109
  42. @SkinnyDennis - 149 silent guardian and observer
  43. @Striking_4 - 105-115
  44. @xy2m - 105- 109
  45. @Transposon - 119 who thinks he's 149​

are u this dense I literally have 120IQ in my bio u fucktard

 

[blanquita444]

First, a map (ChatGPT) :
70–79 (Borderline range)

• Roughly 6% of people.
• Cognitive processing is noticeably below average; abstract reasoning and complex problem-solving are challenging.
• People here can still live independently, but academic learning often requires strong structure and repetition.

80–89 (Low average)

• About 16% of people.
• Can handle daily life and most jobs competently. Abstract or theoretical concepts might feel frustrating or “foggy.”
• Tend to do better with concrete tasks than conceptual reasoning.

90–109 (Average)

• About 50% of people fall here.
• Capable of reasoning, learning, and understanding ideas of average complexity.
• The world is designed for this group — education systems, most professions, and social expectations are calibrated here.

110–119 (High average)

• Roughly 16% of people.
• Grasp abstract ideas faster, can strategize and connect patterns with less explicit instruction.
• Often called “bright,” though not necessarily “gifted.” They thrive in analytical or creative fields when motivated.

120–129 (Superior)

• Around 7% of the population.
• Often labeled as “gifted.” Capable of deep understanding, rapid learning, and advanced abstract thought.
• If curiosity and discipline match intelligence, they can excel in intellectually demanding fields.

130–144 (Highly gifted)

• About 2% of people.
• Very high reasoning ability and fast learning speed. They see relationships others miss, often creating their own conceptual frameworks.
• Prone to perfectionism or existential frustration if unstimulated. Many scientists, inventors, and polymaths fall here.

145+ (Exceptionally gifted / profoundly gifted)

• Less than 0.1% of people.
• Extremely fast and deep cognitive processing, sometimes to the point of struggling to relate socially or emotionally to peers.
• They can conceptualize systems-level ideas — physics, philosophy, or abstract mathematics — with near-instinctive clarity.
• Often have asynchronous development: mental maturity outpaces emotional grounding.
  Now..
  
  1. @lumen - 120-125. However, their most interesting aspect is the very high emotional intelligence, not readily captured by g.
  2. @Night - 105-115. Need, just a little more information
  3. @Rau Le Creuset - 125–129. From my discussions with him on anthropology, he can condense large amounts of information into clear, readable paragraphs. Shows real skill in distilling complexity.
  4. @vespertine - 110-119. Need a bit more to say. Seems capable, but interactions haven’t revealed much yet.
  5. @RAD - 115 - 125. Good at abstract reasoning. Thinks through problems logically, connects ideas well.
  6. @slopslinger - 115–125. A little reserved so conversations have been short. It could be so high because of wishful thinking from my end
  7. @over0 - 122.7. Impressive
  8. @apatheia - humble 123. Humble to the extent of being likeable
  9. @Genetics - 123. However, plagued by overthinking
  10. @johnfkennedy - humble 123. Quite articulate, almost all conversations have been fruitful
  11. @faithful - 105-113. Additionally, emotionally intelligent. Not readily captured by g
  12. @Lebensmude - 119 who thinks he's 130
  13. @rovea - Hidden and underrated 113
  14. @RRM67 - 95-100
  15. @Spuffy - very humble 121. Seen a few long responses from them. Handles abstract reasoning smoothly, articulate, and doesn’t get bogged down in unnecessary verbosity.
  16. @milkjar - 105-110 jail
  17. @hannah - 119 who thinks they're 138
  18. @Warden - humble 126. Most articulate user on forum in terms of their writing
  19. @tuberculosisinmybal - 110. Could absolutely be higher
  20. @Riggedahrage - 90-99
  21. @acketar - 119 who thinks he's 122.7
  22. @AuggyDauggy - 100 - 109
  23. @pompompurino - 100-109
  24. @Kaari - 100 - 109
  25. @Schizotypalcel - 115-119. Favourite forum philosopher
  26. @NewFuckingDay - hidden and humble 120. Another one for whom emotional intelligence dominates
  27. @Logicpilled - 119-?. Larping as you was quite fun.
  28. @limo8 - 100-105. Although very cute and likeable
  29. @giga.mia - 100- 105
  30. @Nbernical - 100 - 109
  31. @Casablanco - 100 - 109
  32. @BigDihDiddy - 90-99.
  33. @Darkeningstar - 130-135. If they indeed are pursuing a PHD in physics, it could be higher by just a couple more points. Yes, I know pursuing a PHD in and of itself is not indicative of intelligence since there are many more variables at play. Most importantly conscientiousness. I just feel it would be superfluous to give my reasoning here.
  A point that's completely off topic..
  Although, their writing is undeniably articulate, and their knowledge is definitely not all lie. I have, never in my life witnessed a person so arrogant and narcissistic about their intelligence. Their vanity and egregiousis solipsism is almost entertaining to watch
  34. @blanquita444 - 100 - 109
  35. @Stardust_ - 80-95. Such an interesting person to watch make sense of the world
  36. @RottingCarrie - 90-105.
  37. @huntergirl - 100- 109
  38. @TonyDr - 115 - 119. I loved reading his responses for the time he was here. Very similar to Randomized in terms of personality and writing.
  39. @Knight - 100 - 109
  39. @97baHater -125 -129. Interactions with him were pleasantly surprising. He falls down the pitfalls of black and white thinking often. Regardless, their fluency in scientific discussion is undeniable.
  40. @Jeezy - 95- 105
  41. @cindythetvisleaking - 100 - 109
  42. @SkinnyDennis - 149 silent guardian and observer
  43. @Striking_4 - 105-115
  44. @xy2m - 105- 109
  45. @Transposon - 119 who thinks he's 149​

My iq is atleast 120 i got it tested when i was younger

 

[iluvegirl]

Wow

 

[blanquita444]

Also i dont like darkeningstar definitely average iq user

 

[iluvegirl]

My iq is atleast 120 i got it tested when i was younger

Your uncle showing you flash cards in the slums of Guadalajara doesn't count as a iq test

 

[Night]

are u this dense I literally have 120IQ in my bio u fucktard

remember all of this is based on forum interactions btw

 

[blanquita444]

Your uncle showing you flash cards in the slums of Guadalajara doesn't count as a iq test

I was born in maine btw

 

[Knight]

Nah my iq is 79 you’re being way too generous

 

[blanquita444]

Nah my iq is 79 you’re being way too generous

Mine is 41

 

[perc40]

n***a just glazing his girl

 

[iluvegirl]

I was born in maine btw

wowwwww

 

[Transposon]

are u this dense I literally have 120IQ in my bio u fucktard

My iq is atleast 120 i got it tested when i was younger

Disclaimer : I apologize if you feel I’ve underestimated your IQ.
Obviously, any analysis based on interactions is inherently limited. This thread is half sarcasm, half serious.
If you think I’m wrong, chances are you’re right, since I probably am.

 

[Knight]

Mine is 41

Mirin

 

[Casablanco]

remember all of this is based on forum interactions btw

yeah fairs then I dont really put any effort into looking smart or knowledgeable on an incel forum im just here to shitpost and waste my time

 

[Transposon]

remember all of this is based on forum interactions btw

Bro you're easily 120+ I was just ragebaiting you btw

 

[iluvegirl]

Also i dont like darkeningstar definitely average iq user

Kinda proving the r****d point blud, tour feelings don't matter when doing a iq estimate

 

[over0]

Your uncle showing you flash cards in the slums of Guadalajara doesn't count as a iq test

Bump

 

[Night]

yeah fairs then I dont really put any effort into looking smart or knowledgeable on an incel forum im just here to shitpost and waste my time

some people just try too hard to be smart on here

 

[milkjar]

thinking lumen and Hannah have an IQ above 100 to begin with

 

[RottingCarrie]

Mines 128 professionally tested from last year

 

[iluvegirl]

Wow I like how we are all 120+ iq professionally tested wowwww

 

[Transposon]

Mines 128 professionally tested from last year

If anything I gave you too high of a score

 

[The Centipede]

I was born in maine btw

Not a true Texan. Yankee.

 

[Night]

@rawvrilkjar -60 iq btw

 

[perc40]

height estimation next

 

[perc40]

@rawvrilkjar -60 iq btw

do you wanna die son

 

[apatheia]

---

~—• @Transposon •—~​

---

(Recession pop)

Humble? Incel I mog you.

(Allessandro Dellisola gif)

 

[Knight]

some people just try too hard to be smart on here

this thread is a joke just jfl and move on

 

[Transposon]

---

~—• @Transposon •—~​

---

(Recession pop)

Humble? Incel I mog you.

(Allessandro Dellisola gif)

Love you, man.
Never change
(Chico gif)

 

[tuberculosisinmybal]

I am 93iq i got it done when I did my autism test but ts was rigged because I couldn't do some of the tasks because I don't have the ability to visualize things and 30% of the test needed it

 

[Night]

this thread is a joke just jfl and move on

yeah ik im not complaining

 

[Transposon]

this thread is a joke just jfl and move on

No bro you don't get it, I had a professional test done I am easily 190

 

[RottingCarrie]

View attachment 195877
If anything I gave you too high of a score

Im serious tho I got it tested during my autism test my dad also has a high iq his is in the 130s they tested me with the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale

 

[Night]

@tuberculosisinmybal is probably 75 (in before ragebait)

 

[snow]

@slopslinger what would u estimate Huy and Abby’s iq to be
I think huy is in the 90-100 range and Abby is in the 70-80 range

 

[Transposon]

Im serious tho I got it tested during my autism test my dad also has a high iq his is in the 130s they tested me with the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale

 

[Knight]

No bro you don't get it, I had a professional test done I am easily 190

I never got any tests done I’m probably at the bare minimum of being a human

 

[peachyfag]

this thread is a joke just jfl and move on

I think he needs some little more informations

 

[tuberculosisinmybal]

@tuberculosisinmybal is probably 75 (in before ragebait)

U could be right tbh I'm not that intelligent

 

[RottingCarrie]

View attachment 195878

I rlly dont understand what your issue is just cuz I dont do well socially doesn't mean I have a low iq

 

[Night]

U could be right tbh I'm not that intelligent

nah you are

 

[Transposon]

I think he needs a little more information

I could have infinite information and get everything wrong. This is mostly a joke. And if there's any real analysis it is then subjective..

 

[peachyfag]

Im serious tho I got it tested during my autism test my dad also has a high iq his is in the 130s they tested me with the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale

You’re probably around 99 tbh

 

[snow]

Im serious tho I got it tested during my autism test my dad also has a high iq his is in the 130s they tested me with the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale

 

[Transposon]

I rlly dont understand what your issue is just cuz I dont do well socially doesn't mean I have a low iq

Okay, sorry.
I believe you blud.
Forgive me

 

[tuberculosisinmybal]

nah you are

View attachment signal-2025-10-15-04-26-17-581.mp4