Join 75,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

anyone have advice for peps

Register to hide this ad
yeah ik “GHK ONLY HOP ON TEST f*g” idm i just need some water ass advice
Dont take ghk. Your better off using tret ot taz. Im not going to explain it all but just read this (its short dont worry)
 
Dont take ghk. Your better off using tret ot taz. Im not going to explain it all but just read this (its short dont worry)
for loose skin test and taz is still better? also i’ve had issues with test due to being mania prone and having naturally higher test
 
No, because some small or lipid-soluble molecules, like thyroid hormones, can pass inside the cell to work
yeah but they wouldn’t be peptide amino based hormones though plus all peptides hormones don’t have the capability to bond with intercellular receptors
 
yeah but they wouldn’t be peptide amino based hormones though plus all peptides hormones don’t have the capability to bond with intercellular receptors
and also the arguement that less then 0.01 percent gets through is kinda misleading because a lot of dermatology work at very low concentrations (retinoids, growth factors, hormones, etc.).

and the whole “GHK-Cu only degrades collagen and doesn’t stimulate collagen synthesis.” just isn’t true
GHK-Cu is studied as a signal peptide so it'll influence: extracellular matrix remodeling, fibroblast activity, collagen expression, wound healing pathways Saying “it only degrades collagen” doesn’t match most of the literature summaries.
and he doesn’t really cite anything from what i saw but i skimmed sorta ngl

edit:he cited one 2022 study with inconclusive results that didn’t align with his point that 0.01 is ineffective
 
Last edited:
and also the arguement that less then 0.01 percent gets through is kinda misleading because a lot of dermatology work at very low concentrations (retinoids, growth factors, hormones, etc.).

and the whole “GHK-Cu only degrades collagen and doesn’t stimulate collagen synthesis.” just isn’t true
GHK-Cu is studied as a signal peptide so it'll influence: extracellular matrix remodeling, fibroblast activity, collagen expression, wound healing pathways Saying “it only degrades collagen” doesn’t match most of the literature summaries.
and he doesn’t really cite anything from what i saw but i skimmed sorta ngl

and also the arguement that less then 0.01 percent gets through is kinda misleading because a lot of dermatology work at very low concentrations (retinoids, growth factors, hormones, etc.).

and the whole “GHK-Cu only degrades collagen and doesn’t stimulate collagen synthesis.” just isn’t true
GHK-Cu is studied as a signal peptide so it'll influence: extracellular matrix remodeling, fibroblast activity, collagen expression, wound healing pathways Saying “it only degrades collagen” doesn’t match most of the literature summaries.
and he doesn’t really cite anything from what i saw but i skimmed sorta ngl

edit:he cited one 2022 study with inconclusive results that didn’t align with his point that 0.01 is ineffective
@hoodsickle why dnr 😔
 
Alr well thanks for the advice and info I’m gonna do more research I’ll keep it in mind
yh it barely works plus ud need to keep doing it very constantly if u really wanna use ghkcu just derma stamp w it tropically imo
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top