anyone tried paid version of chatgpt?

[Deleted Member 79678]

not very likely that anyone here uses it for serious purposes, but feel free to chime in if you ve compared it with a free version

the price is pretty low, i just dont want to bother with paying and using it just to realize it's the same shit eventually

i m asking because i tested the free model in an area where i know what's up and it turned out to be dogshit deluxe, with barely technically intelligible output

 

[roveaa]

The difference ain't that big so I don't think it worth it

 

[Deleted Member 79678]

The difference ain't that big so I don't think it worth it

have that feeling too, that's why i m asking

 

[tulip]

Gotta be a low life form to pay for ai

 

[limo8]

no point tbh if you dont use it super often

 

[Deleted Member 79678]

Gotta be a low life form to pay for ai

that too

 

[rand anon]

Yeah

 

[Deleted Member 79678]

Yeah

HOLY INPUT KING

 

[swanneo]

i use it for it to explain difficult concepts from college sometimes, the paid version is smarter imo, it actually puts out intelligent stuff quotes law accurately and relates niche concepts to others better... the deep research feature is useful too but idk if 20 dollars monthly worth

 

[Deleted Member 79678]

i use it for it to explain difficult concepts from college sometimes, the paid version is smarter imo, it actually puts out intelligent stuff quotes law accurately and relates niche concepts to others better

funny you say this because the free version is just hallucinating and talking nonsense, including making provisions up, when i test it. are you saying this as someone with a degree in law or?

 

[rand anon]

HOLY INPUT KING

i use it for it to explain difficult concepts from college sometimes, the paid version is smarter imo, it actually puts out intelligent stuff quotes law accurately and relates niche concepts to others better... the deep research feature is useful too but idk if 20 dollars monthly worth

 

[Deleted Member 79678]

quote or get quoted world

 

[drchad]

not very likely that anyone here uses it for serious purposes, but feel free to chime in if you ve compared it with a free version

the price is pretty low, i just dont want to bother with paying and using it just to realize it's the same shit eventually

i m asking because i tested the free model in an area where i know what's up and it turned out to be dogshit deluxe, with barely technically intelligible output

Not worth it

 

[swanneo]

funny you say this because the free version is just hallucinating and talking nonsense, including making provisions up, when i test it. are you saying this as someone with a degree in law or?

im on my fifth year of law, but yes, the free version just makes up stuff. the paid version sometimes does too but it's way less likely

 

[Deleted Member 79678]

im on my fifth year of law, but yes, the free version just makes up stuff. the paid version sometimes does too but it's way less likely

interesting.

i ve been testing the free version a lot last week and it's really not good. provided a full text of the criminal procedure code of my country and asked it to do some analysis and answer some questions (nothing too complex, but something i knew you can't answer without at least some degree of understanding of the law deeper than using the search function and extracting provisions containing some key words), and the results were super underwhelming.

though, i've noticed that it's still more potent than the basic free version from a year or so ago, so that's something

 

[Randomized Shame]

@huntergirl

 

[Deleted Member 79678]

@huntergirl

someone about to get fogged to Mesopotamia and back

 

[swanneo]

interesting.

i ve been testing the free version a lot last week and it's really not good. provided a full text of the criminal procedure code of my country and asked it to do some analysis and answer some questions (nothing too complex, but something i knew you can't answer without at least some understanding of the law), and the results were super underwhelming.

though, i've noticed that it's still more potent than the basic free version from a year or so ago, so that's something

omg you're on law too? yes, if you send it a whole code on free it can't even figure out the articles and often times it invents the numbers AND the content. the paid version can identify relevant articles transcribe them and explain them + relate them to the question with results i felt were adequate according to my understanding of it

 

[Randomized Shame]

In my opinion, you shouldn't pay for AI. It's not much 'easier' than just doing research in your free time and so on. However I've never paid for it so I can't speak on it as someone who's used a paid version.

 

[Deleted Member 79678]

omg you're on law too?

@Darkeningstar @ProperPleb2

get a load of this cutie pie

yes, if you send it a whole code on free it can't even figure out the articles and often times it invents the numbers AND the content. the paid version can identify relevant articles transcribe them and explain them + relate them to the question with results i felt were adequate according to my understanding of it

fucking loved it when i asked it to find the relevant article in the civil procedure code and got a completely made up provision as an answer, lmfao. funniest thing is, it was placed (the numbering) correctly, as linea 4 of the existing article regulating the same issue, just with a tiny problem: the actual version of the law had no linea 4 in that article. fake it till you make it type shit, i guess

 

[swanneo]

@Darkeningstar @ProperPleb2

get a load of this cutie pie



fucking loved it when i asked it to find the relevant article in the civil procedure code and got a completely made up provision as an answer, lmfao. funniest thing is, it was placed (the numbering) correctly, as linea 4 of the existing article regulating the same issue, just with a tiny problem: the actual version of the law had no linea 4 in that article. fake it till you make it type shit, i guess

lol i've had to revise some work from other students and it's so evident when they make up the answers or quotes with gpt. they cite articles from completely unrelated titles and unrelated content

 

[Deleted Member 79678]

In my opinion, you shouldn't pay for AI. It's not much 'easier' than just doing research in your free time and so on. However I've never paid for it so I can't speak on it as someone who's used a paid version.

it's really not expensive, so i thought i d try it considering i m checking it here and there anyway. i only use it as a weaponized search engine, though, yeah.

never really had any mindblowing epiphanies from its replies, but i do remember it served me well once - among the list of references (academic papers and textbooks) in a pretty obscure subfield of law it gave me, there was a gem i'd never find otherwise. it was some belgian author and the book wasn't coming up in google or even in private legal databases i have the access to, yet when i checked it, it turned out to be perfectly legit, just cucked by the algorithms or something

 

[Deleted Member 79678]

lol i've had to revise some work from other students and it's so evident when they make up the answers or quotes with gpt. they cite articles from completely unrelated titles and unrelated content

yeah. with any more nuanced topic, you can't really tell bullshit from useful responses unless you are an expert in the field yourself. that's why i only gauge its output quality in those convos where i can immediately tell if it's feeding me AI slop

 

[swanneo]

yeah. with any more nuanced topic, you can't really tell bullshit from useful responses unless you are an expert in the field yourself. that's why i only gauge its output quality in those convos where i can immediately tell if it's feeding me AI slop

yes, me too so that's why i'm wary (among other reasons) of using it for other tasks knowing how it can answer and hallucinate so much. abt ur other reply it has found me some niche papers too on the paid mode but i had to pry it out of it a bit.

 

[Deleted Member 79678]

yes, me too so that's why i'm wary (among other reasons) of using it for other tasks knowing how it can answer and hallucinate so much. abt ur other reply it has found me some niche papers too on the paid mode but i had to pry it out of it a bit.

also, its legal knowledge/training is primarily common law oriented, so using it for queries about civil law systems (your situation too if your location isn't a troll) is like asking for highly niche information in some tribal language spoken by 5k people on earth instead of in english

 

[swanneo]

also, its legal knowledge/training is primarily common law oriented, so using it for queries about civil law systems (your situation too if your location isn't a troll) is like asking for highly niche information in some tribal language spoken by 5k people on earth instead of in english

not a troll and yes haha for me i've found it's pretty good on commercial/tax law subjects, criminal too sometimes, but civil it just makes up so much shit

 

[Deleted Member 79678]

not a troll and yes haha for me i've found it's pretty good on commercial/tax law subjects, criminal too sometimes, but civil it just makes up so much shit

1/1.

on a related note, if someone asked me to explain the difference between common law and civil law institutes, i wouldn't even bother beyond posting this:

. it's hilarious. western culture v japanese culture type shit

 

[swanneo]

1/1.

on a related note, if someone asked me to explain the difference between common law and civil law institutes, i wouldn't even bother beyond posting this:

. it's hilarious. western culture v japanese culture type shit

common law is something i have a hard time understanding even now omg, but everything can be answered like this or with 'it depends' lol

 

[Deleted Member 79678]

common law is something i have a hard time understanding even now omg, but everything can be answered like this or with 'it depends' lol

gotta love that moment when you check the meaning of a term from precedent law and think "interesting, they solved that differently" to yourself just to realize it's the same shit you are used to, just unnecessarily convoluted

 

[Anxietypilled]

not very likely that anyone here uses it for serious purposes, but feel free to chime in if you ve compared it with a free version

the price is pretty low, i just dont want to bother with paying and using it just to realize it's the same shit eventually

i m asking because i tested the free model in an area where i know what's up and it turned out to be dogshit deluxe, with barely technically intelligible output

I always use It

 

[swanneo]

gotta love that moment when you check the meaning of a term from precedent law, think "interesting, they solved that differently" to yourself just to realize it's the same shit you are used to, just unnecessarily convoluted

yup reading like a 40-80 page sentence and realizing it's not useful at all.......