Join 75,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

at what “rating” do factors outside of looks start to be more desirable or important?

darkerthangrey

Active member
Joined
Jun 30, 2026
Messages
180
Online time
1d 3h
Reputation
148
title. i understand that looks are not the only thing in the world, but someone who is sub5 or has visible deformities will definitely be treated differently even if aspects on a social or monetary (unless its insane) level are better relatively.

like i guess a better way to frame would be if they were all the same “level” idrk
 
Register to hide this ad
title. i understand that looks are not the only thing in the world, but someone who is sub5 or has visible deformities will definitely be treated differently even if aspects on a social or monetary (unless its insane) level are better relatively.

like i guess a better way to frame would be if they were all the same “level” idrk
realistically MTN (slightly above average looking)

see there is quite a number of MTNs and most women are naturally hypergamous im not saying men arent
but women are especially when looking into LTRs. if ur a betabuxxed MTN with security youd realistically have more
smv then a hmtn-lhtn in the respective category to women
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top