Join 33,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Discussion Bible’s Historical Reliability

one thing i’ll apologize for is making you think that just because i write decent threads, i’m some clueless saint who doesn’t recognize when i mess up. like, fault? WHAT fault?
thats not the main point, just an extra part. but ur at fault for attacking me and calling me a "pup" when I did nothing against you
obviously, it wasn't towards you. wtf.
it was just towards the person that i agree with in many scenarios who chose to add his input but received harsh feedback from your insults
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #105
thats not the main point, just an extra part. but ur at fault for attacking me and calling me a "pup" when I did nothing against you
"did nothing against you" after accusing me of using artificial intelligence on one of my replies. even so, it wasn't that deep. and, I didn't take it there.
it was just towards the person that i agree with in many scenarios who chose to add his input but received harsh feedback from your insults
once again, wasn't towards you. doesn't matter who it is, you can speak for yourself.
 
"did nothing against you" after accusing me of using artificial intelligence on one of my replies. even so, it wasn't that deep. and, I didn't take it there.
i didnt accuse u of using AI. i accused u of dragging stuff out using your own wording
once again, wasn't towards you. doesn't matter who it is, you can speak for yourself.
I can speak for myself but being demeaning to a person I know is not the best move
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #108
Just quit being a keyboard warrior man , warning fuel
You ducked my response by the way. Until then, you're beneath me in terms of debating about theology.
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #110
i didnt accuse u of using AI.
"summarized by chatgpt" you're basically throwing shade by implying that their words weren’t original and that they had to rely on AI to put things together for me. just.. admit it. it's literally RIGHT THERE. It's like saying, "hey, you couldn't even come up with that on your own, so you needed some machine to help you." even though it might be an innocent observation, it carries the underlying accusation that i'm not capable of thinking or crafting responses without the crutch of AI.
 
"summarized by chatgpt" you're basically throwing shade by implying that their words weren’t original and that they had to rely on AI to put things together for me. just.. admit it. it's literally RIGHT THERE. It's like saying, "hey, you couldn't even come up with that on your own, so you needed some machine to help you." even though it might be an innocent observation, it carries the underlying accusation that i'm not capable of thinking or crafting responses without the crutch of AI.
i used chatgpt to summarize to show how easily your arguments could have been shortened down
ur assuming too much
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #112
I can speak for myself but calling being demeaning to a person I know is not the best move
the person you know called me emotional. so... :waitwhat:
 
Back
Top