Join 68,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Big arms for men is law

You agree with me


  • Total voters
    22
Register to hide this ad
Of course
 
1768433830360.webp
 
my boyfriend have it
 
how hard is it to get 20in arms?
it's hard asf, and not common at all. unless ur 25% bf, with good genetics and hard consistent training for years upon years (and likely roids), it's highly unlikely that you'll get there. that being said, even 16 inch arms look big in real life.
 
it's hard asf, and not common at all. unless ur 25% bf, with good genetics and hard consistent training for years upon years (and likely roids), it's highly unlikely that you'll get there. that being said, even 16 inch arms look big in real life.
Mine are the 17.6 and growing, If I roid out and use insulin again I can get 20 inches.

For some reason my arms don’t look ‘big’ on camera even though they are, my shoulders and brachioradialus makes it look smaller and it sucks
 
Mine are the 17.6 and growing, If I roid out and use insulin again I can get 20 inches.

For some reason my arms don’t look ‘big’ on camera even though they are, my shoulders and brachioradialus makes it look smaller and it sucks
suboptimal muscle insertions are brootal. either way 17.6 is massive, the camera's prob lying, and u can always angle + lighting fraud, but if it's big in real life it doesn't matter.and no way 17.6 inch arms don't look big, jfl. anyways insertions could always be worse:

VJK1A.jpeg
 
suboptimal muscle insertions are brootal. either way 17.6 is massive, the camera's prob lying, and u can always angle + lighting fraud, but if it's big in real life it doesn't matter.and no way 17.6 inch arms don't look big, jfl. anyways insertions could always be worse:

VJK1A.jpeg
they look big irl, on camera its worse. My insertions aren’t brutal I just have a proportion issue. Guy in the pic has shit insertions
 
Appreciate the second option
 
they look big irl, on camera its worse. My insertions aren’t brutal I just have a proportion issue. Guy in the pic has shit insertions
yeah, if my shoulders ever stop growing then i'll train arms way less, shoulders and back have to dominate imo
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top