Join 33,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Brad pitt is proof that zygos are cope

  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #2
1731262284710.pngno cheekbones
vs
1731262395147.pngWide zygomatic bones
I don't see any significant difference
 

Attachments

  • 1731262290464.png
    1731262290464.png
    367.9 KB · Views: 7
  • 1731262324910.png
    1731262324910.png
    411.6 KB · Views: 5
  • 1731262334590.png
    1731262334590.png
    367.9 KB · Views: 7
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #5
They both have high or prominent cheekbones its just not autism psl tier plus leo is famous for his eyes , prettyboy lookz and pheno and brad pitt for his lower third
1731263285394.png"Prominent and high" lmao. The flattest zygos I've ever seen + they are medium set at best. + I weren't talking about dicaprio the thread is about pitt
 
View attachment 52888"Prominent and high" lmao. The flattest zygos I've ever seen + they are medium set at best. + I weren't talking about dicaprio the thread is about pitt
He has hollow cheeks in every picture

Therefore he has prominent, semi high set and large cheekbones

What else causes the huge shadow in every pic? Obv bonemass in his midface
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #7
He has hollow cheeks in every picture
og curve ≠ good cheekbones.
Therefore he has prominent, semi high set and large cheekbones
Large cheekbones doesn't mean good cheekbones.1731263990307.png
My english teacher has extremely large jaw but he looks like subhuman. Size of jaw/cheekbones is cope. Harmony is law. Brad pitt's zygos are medium-low set + lack lateral prjection. Jfl at thinking that he has high cheekbones. 1731264100623.pnglow set
Vs.
1731264188388.pnghigh set
What else causes the huge shadow in every pic? Obv bonemass in his midface
His zygomatic bones look like shit in any pic
 
og curve ≠ good cheekbones.

Large cheekbones doesn't mean good cheekbones.View attachment 52889
My english teacher has extremely large jaw but he looks like subhuman. Size of jaw/cheekbones is cope. Harmony is law. Brad pitt's zygos are medium-low set + lack lateral prjection. Jfl at thinking that he has high cheekbones. View attachment 52890low set
Vs.
View attachment 52891high set

His zygomatic bones look like shit in any pic
Theres no autistic formula to good cheekbones but to say pitts are below average is false
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #11
cope. his zygos r wide and high-mid set so they are still good
I already measured setness of his cheekbones. And gave examples. His zygos are medium set. No point in coping with cheekbones
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #15
I agree that setness of cheekbones does matter but size, shape of zygomatic bones doesn't matter unless you have hypoplasia. And Brad Pitt is a good example of what i'm talking about
 
Bro he has already has good features
-good eye area
-strong and robust jaw
-good skin
-perfect androgyny

having nuclear mutant zygos is a cope .
 

Similar threads


Back
Top