Can someone use these ratios to rate a brudda pls

[Deleted Member 87568]

idk if my maths is wrong, but I'm getting crazy results that dont look right. I used @Archelaus guide

Esr, 45.2%
Facial thirds: 34.2% (u), 32.7% (m), 33.1% (l)
Canthal tilt: +6.2°
Fwhr: 1.96
Jaw frontal angle: 91.4°
Cheekbone high-settedness: 78.4%
Total facial height-to-width: 1.36
Bigonal width (relative): 81.2%
Chin-to-philtrum ratio: 2.35
Neck width: 90.5%
Mouth-to-nose ratio: 1.45
Midface ratio: 1.08
Eyebrow settedness: 88.5%
Eye spacing (1 eye test): 1.01
Eye aspect ratio (w/h): 3.15
Lower-to-upper lip ratio: 1.58
Deviation of iaa and jfa: 2.1°
Eyebrow tilt: 9.1°
Bitemporal width: 84.8%
Lower third proportion: 33.1%
Ipsilateral alar angle (iaa): 89.3°

Gonial angle: 121°
Nasofrontal angle: 118.5°
Mandible plane angle: 19.2°
Ramus-to-mandible ratio: 0.68
Facial convexity (glabella): ideal
Submental cervical angle: 92°
Nasofacial angle: 34.1°
Nasolabial angle: 104°
Orbital vector: positive
Total facial convexity: 168°
Mentolabial angle: 124°
Facial convexity (nasion): ideal
Nasal projection: 0.58
Nasal width-height: 0.72
Rickett's e-line: lower lip -2mm, upper lip -4mm
Holdaway h-line: ideal
Steiner s-line: ideal
Burstone line: ideal
Nasomental angle: 128°
Gonion-mouth relationship: below mouth line
Recession (frankfort plane): none
Browridge inclination: 14.5°
Nasal tip angle: 102°

 

[Ghoultune]

Yeah guve me A second!

 

[Ghoultune]

Yeah guve me A second!

These stats describe a face that is highly
symmetrical, masculine, and aerodynamic. From a technical "golden ratio" or "looksmaxxing" perspective, these metrics are exceptionally strong.

 

[Deleted Member 87568]

These stats describe a face that is highly
symmetrical, masculine, and aerodynamic. From a technical "golden ratio" or "looksmaxxing" perspective, these metrics are exceptionally strong.

 

[Deleted member 77539]

@Sink @Cat. Thoughts?

 

[Almighty Sigma Wolf]

idk if my maths is wrong, but I'm getting crazy results that dont look right. I used @Archelaus guide

Esr, 45.2%
Facial thirds: 34.2% (u), 32.7% (m), 33.1% (l)
Canthal tilt: +6.2°
Fwhr: 1.96
Jaw frontal angle: 91.4°
Cheekbone high-settedness: 78.4%
Total facial height-to-width: 1.36
Bigonal width (relative): 81.2%
Chin-to-philtrum ratio: 2.35
Neck width: 90.5%
Mouth-to-nose ratio: 1.45
Midface ratio: 1.08
Eyebrow settedness: 88.5%
Eye spacing (1 eye test): 1.01
Eye aspect ratio (w/h): 3.15
Lower-to-upper lip ratio: 1.58
Deviation of iaa and jfa: 2.1°
Eyebrow tilt: 9.1°
Bitemporal width: 84.8%
Lower third proportion: 33.1%
Ipsilateral alar angle (iaa): 89.3°

Gonial angle: 121°
Nasofrontal angle: 118.5°
Mandible plane angle: 19.2°
Ramus-to-mandible ratio: 0.68
Facial convexity (glabella): ideal
Submental cervical angle: 92°
Nasofacial angle: 34.1°
Nasolabial angle: 104°
Orbital vector: positive
Total facial convexity: 168°
Mentolabial angle: 124°
Facial convexity (nasion): ideal
Nasal projection: 0.58
Nasal width-height: 0.72
Rickett's e-line: lower lip -2mm, upper lip -4mm
Holdaway h-line: ideal
Steiner s-line: ideal
Burstone line: ideal
Nasomental angle: 128°
Gonion-mouth relationship: below mouth line
Recession (frankfort plane): none
Browridge inclination: 14.5°
Nasal tip angle: 102°

Bros trying to plug in his binary measurements like we're robots

Hmmm 0.58 nasal projection I think that's 0.23 @collagen units above ideal

@Vampi those who know collagen units

 

[Sink]

idk if my maths is wrong, but I'm getting crazy results that dont look right. I used @Archelaus guide

Esr, 45.2%
Facial thirds: 34.2% (u), 32.7% (m), 33.1% (l)
Canthal tilt: +6.2°
Fwhr: 1.96
Jaw frontal angle: 91.4°
Cheekbone high-settedness: 78.4%
Total facial height-to-width: 1.36
Bigonal width (relative): 81.2%
Chin-to-philtrum ratio: 2.35
Neck width: 90.5%
Mouth-to-nose ratio: 1.45
Midface ratio: 1.08
Eyebrow settedness: 88.5%
Eye spacing (1 eye test): 1.01
Eye aspect ratio (w/h): 3.15
Lower-to-upper lip ratio: 1.58
Deviation of iaa and jfa: 2.1°
Eyebrow tilt: 9.1°
Bitemporal width: 84.8%
Lower third proportion: 33.1%
Ipsilateral alar angle (iaa): 89.3°

Gonial angle: 121°
Nasofrontal angle: 118.5°
Mandible plane angle: 19.2°
Ramus-to-mandible ratio: 0.68
Facial convexity (glabella): ideal
Submental cervical angle: 92°
Nasofacial angle: 34.1°
Nasolabial angle: 104°
Orbital vector: positive
Total facial convexity: 168°
Mentolabial angle: 124°
Facial convexity (nasion): ideal
Nasal projection: 0.58
Nasal width-height: 0.72
Rickett's e-line: lower lip -2mm, upper lip -4mm
Holdaway h-line: ideal
Steiner s-line: ideal
Burstone line: ideal
Nasomental angle: 128°
Gonion-mouth relationship: below mouth line
Recession (frankfort plane): none
Browridge inclination: 14.5°
Nasal tip angle: 102°

holy yakub
and why is ur bigonial so narrow wtf