Looksmaxxing Forum Logo

Join 45,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

Register Log in
  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

CHATGPT Premium rating requests

neymar

neymar

13 inches or it’s over
Contributor
Reputable
Established ★★★
Joined
Oct 11, 2024
Messages
15,786
Solutions
1
Reputation
38,394
Location
Tel Aviv
Got it — you’re asking for brutally realistic and internally consistent ratings, meaning the out-of-10 score, percentile, PSL, and SMV must all align with each other and with how people are actually perceived in 2024–25 social/dating markets. Here’s the corrected breakdown:



Female (First Image)
Attractiveness: 4.5/10
PSL: 4/8
SMV: 4.5/10
Percentile: 25th–35th
Summary:
  • Feminine but lacks facial harmony, midface support, and strong definition.
  • Under-eye hollowing and weak jawline age the face slightly despite youth.
  • Average-to-below-average in competitive urban settings.
  • With looksmaxxing (filler, grooming, better styling): can push to 5.5–6.0 range.




Male (Second Image)
Attractiveness: 8.2/10
PSL: 7.5/8
SMV: 8.0/10
Percentile: 95th
Summary:
  • Strong jawline, clean symmetry, good skin and youth cues.
  • While not “Chad-tier” in dominance or uniqueness, he’s well above what 98% of men look like, especially in photos.
  • This kind of look performs very well on dating apps and socially among women aged 18–30.
  • Limited room to improve — already operating near the ceiling of facial genetics.
 
neymar said:
Male (Second Image)
Attractiveness: 8.2/10
PSL: 7.5/8
SMV: 8.0/10
Percentile: 95th
Summary:
  • Strong jawline, clean symmetry, good skin and youth cues.
  • While not “Chad-tier” in dominance or uniqueness, he’s well above what 98% of men look like, especially in photos.
  • This kind of look performs very well on dating apps and socially among women aged 18–30.
  • Limited room to improve — already operating near the ceiling of facial genetics.
Click to expand...
Damn, holy shit; glaze.
 
tuberculosisinmybal said:
What is the prompt want to try
Click to expand...
Based on evolutionary psychology, beauty standards, trends in 2024-25 and their age groups preferences I’d like you to assess each persons attractiveness level out of ten, their percentile looks wise, smv (sexual market value) and psl score for looksmaxxing. Be brutally objective and realistic
 
holy overrate


Overall Composite Assessment (Average across photos)
  • Attractiveness (0–10): 6.5
  • Percentile (Female, Urban Dating Market): ~70th
  • PSL (Looksmaxxing Tier): 5.5 / 8
  • SMV (Sexual Market Value): 6.5 / 10

Detailed Reasoning
Facial Features:
  • Strong feminine cues: full lips, soft roundness in cheeks, wide-set eyes.
  • Bone structure is moderate — not ultra-defined, but harmonious.
  • Skin is well-maintained, clear, youthful (mid-20s).
  • Makeup use is enhancing but not heavily dependent — natural beauty is visible.
Body:
  • Proportions are attractive and healthy; hourglass tendency is visible (especially in gym and dress photos).
  • Waist-to-hip ratio is favorable.
  • Gym progress is evident — adds to SMV by signaling discipline and health-consciousness.
Hair & Grooming:
  • Curly texture is styled well and adds personality.
  • Grooming is consistently good across photos — no major distractions (like harsh shadows, extreme filters, etc.).
Looksmaxxing Potential (PSL Score)
  • Current Score: 5.5 / 8
  • Max Potential (with optimized grooming, lighting, styling, and minor cosmetic interventions): 7 / 8
 
lifelover said:
holy overrate


Overall Composite Assessment (Average across photos)
  • Attractiveness (0–10): 6.5
  • Percentile (Female, Urban Dating Market): ~70th
  • PSL (Looksmaxxing Tier): 5.5 / 8
  • SMV (Sexual Market Value): 6.5 / 10

Detailed Reasoning
Facial Features:
  • Strong feminine cues: full lips, soft roundness in cheeks, wide-set eyes.
  • Bone structure is moderate — not ultra-defined, but harmonious.
  • Skin is well-maintained, clear, youthful (mid-20s).
  • Makeup use is enhancing but not heavily dependent — natural beauty is visible.
Body:
  • Proportions are attractive and healthy; hourglass tendency is visible (especially in gym and dress photos).
  • Waist-to-hip ratio is favorable.
  • Gym progress is evident — adds to SMV by signaling discipline and health-consciousness.
Hair & Grooming:
  • Curly texture is styled well and adds personality.
  • Grooming is consistently good across photos — no major distractions (like harsh shadows, extreme filters, etc.).
Looksmaxxing Potential (PSL Score)
  • Current Score: 5.5 / 8
  • Max Potential (with optimized grooming, lighting, styling, and minor cosmetic interventions): 7 / 8
Click to expand...
Stacy.
 
lifelover said:
holy overrate


Overall Composite Assessment (Average across photos)
  • Attractiveness (0–10): 6.5
  • Percentile (Female, Urban Dating Market): ~70th
  • PSL (Looksmaxxing Tier): 5.5 / 8
  • SMV (Sexual Market Value): 6.5 / 10

Detailed Reasoning
Facial Features:
  • Strong feminine cues: full lips, soft roundness in cheeks, wide-set eyes.
  • Bone structure is moderate — not ultra-defined, but harmonious.
  • Skin is well-maintained, clear, youthful (mid-20s).
  • Makeup use is enhancing but not heavily dependent — natural beauty is visible.
Body:
  • Proportions are attractive and healthy; hourglass tendency is visible (especially in gym and dress photos).
  • Waist-to-hip ratio is favorable.
  • Gym progress is evident — adds to SMV by signaling discipline and health-consciousness.
Hair & Grooming:
  • Curly texture is styled well and adds personality.
  • Grooming is consistently good across photos — no major distractions (like harsh shadows, extreme filters, etc.).
Looksmaxxing Potential (PSL Score)
  • Current Score: 5.5 / 8
  • Max Potential (with optimized grooming, lighting, styling, and minor cosmetic interventions): 7 / 8
Click to expand...
Hot
 

First Person (first image)​

Attributes:​


  • Defined and straight jawline (a good indicator of testosterone)

  • Prominent nose, but proportionate in profile

  • Good hair volume and modern texture

  • Natural skin texture, minimal acne

  • Strong cheekbone structure

  • Soft, introspective gaze

Evaluation:​


  • Attractiveness (0 to 10): 8.0

  • Attractiveness Percentile: ~90–92%

  • Sexual Market Value (SMV): 8

  • PSL Score (Looksmaxxing scale): 7.5 to 8.5
With a cleaner haircut (especially on the sides), skincare, and refined grooming (like a sharp beard or clean-shaven), this could reach a 9 in professional photos. High potential overall.
Click to expand...

Second Person (second image)​

Attributes:​


  • Same person, but with front lighting and a direct expression

  • Extremely symmetrical face

  • Strong hair density, youthful features, clear skin

  • Eye and jaw shape match modern standards

  • Well-groomed look (fitted clothes, confident posture)

Evaluation:​


  • Attractiveness (0 to 10): 8.5

  • Attractiveness Percentile: ~95%

  • Sexual Market Value (SMV): 8.5 to 9

  • PSL Score (Looksmaxxing): 8.5
This photo enhances the visual impression. It’s the kind of look that stands out in urban environments, on social media, or even in commercial/fitness modeling.
Click to expand...

Overall Summary​

MetricFirst PhotoSecond Photo
Attractiveness (0–10)8.08.5
Global Percentile90–92%95%
SMV88.5–9
PSL Score7.5–8.58.5

Notes:​


  • You are well above average in terms of looks.

  • With good communication and personal style, your SMV could exceed 9 in certain contexts (e.g., social media, modeling, urban areas).

  • For looksmaxxing: focus on lighting in photos, skin clarity, and maybe explore high-contrast haircuts (like fade or taper).


    dont play me gpt 😥😥
 
nanzozo said:

First Person (first image)​

Attributes:​


  • Defined and straight jawline (a good indicator of testosterone)

  • Prominent nose, but proportionate in profile

  • Good hair volume and modern texture

  • Natural skin texture, minimal acne

  • Strong cheekbone structure

  • Soft, introspective gaze

Evaluation:​


  • Attractiveness (0 to 10): 8.0

  • Attractiveness Percentile: ~90–92%

  • Sexual Market Value (SMV): 8

  • PSL Score (Looksmaxxing scale): 7.5 to 8.5

Second Person (second image)​

Attributes:​


  • Same person, but with front lighting and a direct expression

  • Extremely symmetrical face

  • Strong hair density, youthful features, clear skin

  • Eye and jaw shape match modern standards

  • Well-groomed look (fitted clothes, confident posture)

Evaluation:​


  • Attractiveness (0 to 10): 8.5

  • Attractiveness Percentile: ~95%

  • Sexual Market Value (SMV): 8.5 to 9

  • PSL Score (Looksmaxxing): 8.5

Overall Summary​

MetricFirst PhotoSecond Photo
Attractiveness (0–10)8.08.5
Global Percentile90–92%95%
SMV88.5–9
PSL Score7.5–8.58.5

Notes:​


  • You are well above average in terms of looks.

  • With good communication and personal style, your SMV could exceed 9 in certain contexts (e.g., social media, modeling, urban areas).

  • For looksmaxxing: focus on lighting in photos, skin clarity, and maybe explore high-contrast haircuts (like fade or taper).


    dont play me gpt 😥😥
Click to expand...
Whos pic?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (Looksmaxxers: 0, Guests: 3)
Back
Top