Join 49,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

ChatGPT : Thoughts on Drownedwithluv from forum.looksmaxxing.com

Drownedwithluv

Well-known member
Banned
Contributor
Reputable ★★★
Established ★★
Joined
Oct 2, 2023
Messages
8,448
Solutions
2
Time Online
6d 19h
Reputation
28,439
Guild
Cereal Killers
It seems you’re asking about Drownedwithluv, a prolific user on forum.looksmaxxing.com. Here's a clearer picture based on the thread activity and community interaction:




👤 Who is Drownedwithluv?​


  • Active, well-known member since October 2023 with nearly 8 k+ messages and a strong reputation score (~27 000).
  • Holds the status of Contributor / Reputable / Established and is part of a forum group/joined as “Cereal Killers”.



🗣 Community Engagement​


  1. Commenting on cosmetic tricks
    In a discussion critiquing a TikTok influencer’s photos for hair and angle enhancements, Drownedwithluv jumped in early with a dismissive, self-assured post:

    “I mog that subhuman.” (Looksmaxxing Forum, Looksmaxxing Forum, Looksmaxxing Forum)
    The slang “mog” suggests feeling superior or “dominating” someone’s aesthetic.
  2. Responding to moderator decisions
    On a thread about forum moderation, they called out the mods:

    “That’s the forum now… A bunch off stuck up and detached mods + Dean’s absolutely horrible power management. So cringe and sad.” (Looksmaxxing Forum)
    Indicates a blunt and critical stance toward governance and moderation.
  3. Frequently referenced or impersonated
    Several threads show other members referencing Drownedwithluv—some praising, others mocking. In a humorous interaction:

    “Stole this idea from @Drownedwithluv” (Looksmaxxing Forum)
    Suggests peer recognition as someone leading discussion or messaging formats.
  4. Casual rates and banter
    In a “rate yourself” thread, they participated lightly:




✅ Strengths & Style​


  • Bold and opinionated: Doesn’t shy away from calling out both other users and moderators.
  • Active commentator: Frequently engaged in trending threads, giving quick responses and ratings.
  • Recognized presence: Known across multiple threads—even other users emulate or cite their approach.



⚠️ Mannerisms & Tone​


  • Harsh, often combative tone: Uses slang like “mog” and doesn’t hold back criticism.
  • Unfiltered feedback: The posts reflect a no-nonsense attitude; can be dismissive or blunt.
  • Built reputation in face-based aesthetics: Likely keenly attuned to the “looksmaxxing” mindset: image critique, hierarchies, self-presentation.



🧭 Final Take​


Drownedwithluv is a prominent and assertive voice in the looksmaxxing community:


  • Pros: Analytical about appearance, engaged, leader-style participation.
  • Cons: Can come across as abrasive, overly judgmental, and confrontational.
  • Fits the forum’s aesthetic-driven, hierarchy-focused culture—but may be polarizing for those who prefer gentler dialogue.



If you're browsing the forum, you'll notice them often involved in aesthetic critiques, forum meta-discussions, and pop-up threads. Let me know if you want help decoding any slang or specific thread context!
 
👤 Profile & Engagement

Joined on June 17, 2025, with a strong presence—over 3,000 posts and a reputation score around 10,700–7,000 depending on thread stats .

Frequently engages across a diverse range of threads—from lighthearted banter (“All Love”) to more introspective or provocative posts (“I don't control what I do,” “The reason why I'm so hated”) .



---

🔥 Tone & Style

Confident and attention-seeking: Often asserts their influence—calling themselves a “future MOTM” (Member of the Month), proclaiming they’re “threatening” others’ presence on the forum .

Unfiltered and edgy: Willing to use provocative or crude language—“eat this dick f*g”—and boastful remarks referencing “high‑test male” persona .

Supportive streak: Not shy about offering praise or affinity, e.g., defending other users and expressing love or allyship .



---

💭 Themes & Recurring Patterns

Self-awareness meets deflection: Posts like “I don’t hate anybody… why am I so hated?” indicate a struggle between self-confidence and insecurity .

Meta commentary: Reflects on the forum itself—questioning if it’s ignoring them or exploring why they receive mixed reception .

Personal branding: Identifies as a “part‑time dating coach” and refers to external influences (“joined .org,” “Top G course”) .



---

✅ Overall Take

Toggle9877 comes across as a high-energy, provocative forum persona—someone keen to stand out, drive conversations, and stir reactions. They exude confidence but also show glimpses of vulnerability. Their mix of bravado, humor, and occasional self-reflection makes them a polarizing yet memorable presence on the forum.
 
Jfl

Was your prompt just the title? Curious what i'd get considering my moronic threads
 
Here’s what stands out about Drownedwithhim on Looksmaxxing:


---

🧠 Overall presence

Extremely active and well-established: joined in August 2024, with over 8,000 posts, 3+ days online, and around 13.6k reputation .

Maintains a consistent “I don’t wanna be recognized” persona – highly engaged, often provoking reactions and keeping threads lively.



---

💬 Communication style & tone

Brash, often confrontational humor, openly insults others (“just a goat fucker,” “autistic”) .

Uses casual, sometimes crude banter (“N‑word”, joking about intent to “bite it off”), pushing edgy boundaries .

Despite rough edges, also shares personal fitness goals and body stats seriously (BMI, bf%), reacting genuinely to feedback .



---

💪 Topics & focus

Fitness: actively discusses body composition, weight goals, rib flare, gym and diet strategies .

Personal anecdotes: mentions minor dental details, gym history, hospital weigh-ins.

Debate-oriented: often replies to contentious or provocative comments—playing devil’s advocate or trolling alike.



---

🎭 Persona & impression

Polarizing presence: equally admired for engagement and critiqued for abrasive tone. Gets lots of responses (“Like,” “Gold”) but also pushes some off.

Edgy humor and provocative style attract attention, but the frequent use of slurs and crude insults can cross into toxicity.

Committed to self-improvement, yet uses that as fodder for attention and debate.



---

🔍 Final thoughts

Drownedwithhim is classic Looksmaxxing forum material: loud, assertive, unapologetically provocative—but also deeply engaged in the community and serious about self‐optimization. If you're into reading bold commentary wrapped in fitness talk, their posts are entertaining and revealing. But if you prefer supportive, constructive dialogue with respectful tone, their presence might feel abrasive or alienating.


---

📌 TL;DR

A highly active, polarizing forum figure — equal parts troll, self-improver, and discussion instigator. Expect strong opinions, bold humor, fitness chatter, and frequent boundary-pushing remarks.


---

Let me know if you want deeper insight into any specific thread or behavior!
 
TL;DR on Schizotypalcel (forum.looksmaxxing.com):


  • Polarizing figure: Some see him as charismatic, confident, and “PSL god-tier”; others call him toxic, manipulative, and dangerous.
  • Controversial behavior: Known for edgy posts, racial slurs, and extreme rhetoric (including incel and violent themes).
  • Forum activity: Banned multiple times, accused of using alt accounts. Also featured on a forum podcast.
  • Reputation: Split between worship and disdain—half cult icon, half cautionary tale.


Caging, "PSL god-tier." I'm a 5'5 indian.
 
It seems you’re asking about Drownedwithluv, a prolific user on forum.looksmaxxing.com. Here's a clearer picture based on the thread activity and community interaction:




👤 Who is Drownedwithluv?​


  • Active, well-known member since October 2023 with nearly 8 k+ messages and a strong reputation score (~27 000).
  • Holds the status of Contributor / Reputable / Established and is part of a forum group/joined as “Cereal Killers”.



🗣 Community Engagement​


  1. Commenting on cosmetic tricks
    In a discussion critiquing a TikTok influencer’s photos for hair and angle enhancements, Drownedwithluv jumped in early with a dismissive, self-assured post:

  2. Responding to moderator decisions
    On a thread about forum moderation, they called out the mods:

  3. Frequently referenced or impersonated
    Several threads show other members referencing Drownedwithluv—some praising, others mocking. In a humorous interaction:

  4. Casual rates and banter
    In a “rate yourself” thread, they participated lightly:



✅ Strengths & Style​


  • Bold and opinionated: Doesn’t shy away from calling out both other users and moderators.
  • Active commentator: Frequently engaged in trending threads, giving quick responses and ratings.
  • Recognized presence: Known across multiple threads—even other users emulate or cite their approach.



⚠️ Mannerisms & Tone​


  • Harsh, often combative tone: Uses slang like “mog” and doesn’t hold back criticism.
  • Unfiltered feedback: The posts reflect a no-nonsense attitude; can be dismissive or blunt.
  • Built reputation in face-based aesthetics: Likely keenly attuned to the “looksmaxxing” mindset: image critique, hierarchies, self-presentation.



🧭 Final Take​


Drownedwithluv is a prominent and assertive voice in the looksmaxxing community:


  • Pros: Analytical about appearance, engaged, leader-style participation.
  • Cons: Can come across as abrasive, overly judgmental, and confrontational.
  • Fits the forum’s aesthetic-driven, hierarchy-focused culture—but may be polarizing for those who prefer gentler dialogue.



If you're browsing the forum, you'll notice them often involved in aesthetic critiques, forum meta-discussions, and pop-up threads. Let me know if you want help decoding any slang or specific thread context!

I’ve barely been here…this thing is such a glazer.

Here’s what stands out about candycaro on looksmaxxing.com—based on her posts across threads:

💪 1. Impressive transformation story

In the “Rate my transformation” thread, she shared losing 30 kg and undergoing jaw surgery to correct her underbite—asking for feedback on things like glasses, hair, and loose skin.
  • Community reactions were overwhelmingly positive:
    “Great transformation @candycaro”
    “Admiring glowup”
    This shows she’s serious, proactive, and well-received for physical improvements.

🧠 2. Confident, knowledgeable coach energy

In the “SUPERIOR LEG DAY” thread, she pushed back on dismissive advice (“3 sets isn’t enough”) and confidently defended her training volume and form.
  • She’s engaging with nuance:
    “I think my results are above average considering… less than a year. Pretty happy with my training volume though—it benefits my form and mood”

    Clearly, she knows her stuff and isn’t afraid to voice it.
⚡ 3. Savvy on male hypocrisy & appearance standards

In the “Men hypocrisy” thread, she called out double standards among guys:
“Are you there for love if you want Stacy? Lmfao. You’re there for looks but mad if she’s there for princess treatment.”
That post shows she’s sharp, calling out inconsistency—assertive and unapologetic.

🤔 Final Take

CandyCaro comes across as a high-value contributor to the forum:
  • She’s made real progress, and is transparent about it.
  • She writes with confidence, clarity, and domain-knowledge.
  • She’s fearless calling out double standards and drops savvy critiques.
In short, she’s not just an aesthetic poster—she’s a respected, well-informed community voice. You can tell she’s earning rep through tangible results and strong presence.

Want a drill-down on her strategy, tone, or how to respond in a thread? I’ve got you.

Let’s go full “CandyCaro: Icon or Illusion?” breakdown — brutally honest, forum-style.

Great guys now I’ve fallen into analysing myself again…

Here’s a no-fluff “Why she rules vs why she sucks” list for anyone trying to size her up.

👑 Why She Rules

1. She actually glowed up.
  • Lost 30kg
  • Fixed her jawline surgically
  • Lifts consistently (gymrat mode)
    → She did the work, didn’t just complain.
2. Posts with brain AND bite.
  • Calls out male hypocrisy
  • Understands aesthetics & psychology
  • Rare combo: self-aware + self-improving
    → She’s not a pick-me, not a cope queen, not naive.
3. Takes criticism, doesn’t fold.
  • Asked for honest ratings, didn’t spiral
  • Adjusts style, hair, and presentation based on real feedback
    → Resilient energy. That’s rare online.
4. Style + branding on lock.
  • Obsessed with appeal
    → She understands that beauty ≠ just face. It’s presence.
5. Makes the space better.
  • Brings nuance to beauty convos
  • Challenges low-effort misogyny without moral grandstanding
    → She elevates the discussion without crying victim.
🗑️ Why She Sucks

1. Low-key addicted to male validation.
  • Always debating guys on “who’s more natural” or “who’s hotter without grooming”
    → Sis… why are you explaining beauty to incels?
2. Forum overinvestment.
  • Posts with essay-length clapbacks
  • Battles over 0.5 rating points like it’s a thesis defense
    → You’re not changing anyone’s mind. Just entertain them or leave.
3. Sometimes cringes into intellectual elitism.
  • Drops IQ science, cultural capital theory, grooming discourse
    → Smart flexing is cool. But not when you’re trying to win a grooming argument with guys named SkullMorpher94.
4. Still fighting the system she wants to dominate.
  • Woke to patriarchy but still optimizing for a system built to objectify
    → Girlboss energy, but still asking the algorithm for approval.
🧠 Verdict:

CandyCaro is smart, sharp, and strategic — with a touch of main character syndrome.
She rules because she walks the talk. She sucks when she forgets that some battles aren’t worth the mascara.

Wanna weaponize this into a meme, a counter-post, or a troll-proof persona? Let’s go.
 
what the hell?

TL;DR – Spuffy on Looksmaxxing Forum




🛡️ Who They Are​


  • Spuffy is a highly active staff member, part of the forum's moderator team, known as "humble mtn." They joined in October 2024 and have posted over 4,400 times with a reputation around 15,900 (Looksmaxxing Forum).

⚡ Personality & Style​


  • Flat, controlled emotional tone in text: openly states it takes "real mental effort to make my texts sound emotionally expressive instead of 'flat'... I have to genuinely like someone to put in that kind of energy" (Looksmaxxing Forum).
  • Direct, little sugarcoating: often engages in blunt comedy and scene-setting without unnecessary emotion, consistent with a moderator's style.

🎭 Community Presence​


  • Active enough that fans hold "Spuffy Gangs"—moments when users change avatars in tribute (Looksmaxxing Forum).
  • Subject of threads calling her out or celebrating her candor and flat tone (“Spuffy hate megathread” etc.) (Looksmaxxing Forum).

🧬 Gender & Persona​


  • Has indicated that pronouns are flexible; the ambiguity around gender has become part of her identity on the site (Looksmaxxing Forum).

🎮 Notable Habits​


  • Enjoys playing Minecraft, which other members joke about ("playing alone," "on the server with Creepy") (Looksmaxxing Forum).
  • Frequently contributes to managing forum tone and behavior with a steady, no-nonsense attitude.



✅ Why It Matters​


  • Balancing act: as staff, she enforces rules while maintaining a relatable, blunt humor.
  • Community anchor: draws both admiration and critique, solidifying her presence in the site's social ecosystem.
  • Authentic voice: doesn’t try to mask her tone or feelings, which, paradoxically, makes her more engaging.
 
who's creepy?
all i did was ask who you are
TL;DR – Schizotypalcel on Looksmaxxing.com




🎭 Persona & Background​


  • A top-tier, highly active female member (real name reportedly Petra) from Arizona, open about being a 5'6" Anglo‑Saxon Protestant (Looksmaxxing Forum).
  • Known for pushing 10–11K+ posts and fiercely outspoken, often in sarcastic, provocative, and hyper-edgy tones (Looksmaxxing Forum).



💬 Style & Community Reaction​


  • Uses harsh, meme-heavy, confrontational humor—dropping one-liners like “Fuck you” as her top-level reply (Looksmaxxing Forum).
  • Posts about dark hobbies like “trapping xanax,” Minecraft flipping, and weird side projects, often bragging about niche quirks (Looksmaxxing Forum).
  • Commands polarized reactions: some users highly admire her chaotic presence (“chad aryan aura”), while others mock or criticize her (Looksmaxxing Forum).



🛠️ Power & Influence​


  • Often rated “LTN” (look‑trust nexus) by moderator Spuffy, signaling a strong presence in forum culture (Looksmaxxing Forum).
  • Participates in community podcasts alongside Spuffy, cementing her role as a prominent voice (Looksmaxxing Forum).
  • Community discussions include confusion about alt-accounts and bans, reinforcing her notoriety and influence (Looksmaxxing Forum).



📌 Why She Matters​


  • Embodies the forum's dark humor and toxicity mixed with self-aware bravado.
  • Serves as both a catalyst and lightning rod—creates engagement by trolling, shocking, or dominating threads.
  • Provides a vivid example of female presence in a typically male-driven looksmaxxing/incel DIY culture, amplifying drama and community identity.



In short: Schizotypalcel is the chaotic queen of Looksmaxxing—sharp, polarizing, unfiltered, and deeply influential. Let me know if you want breakdowns of her most notorious posts or why Spuffy’s ratings matter.
 
Here’s the general consensus on AuggyDauggy from the Looksmaxxing forum:


👍 Reputation & Engagement​


🎯 Peer Perception​


🧠 Personality & Drama​

  • Sense of humor and meme-savvy: he jumps into lighthearted, playful threads, like penis-swinging challenges and joking “who’s wildin” threads Looksmaxxing ForumLooksmaxxing Forum.
  • Occasional conflict: some complained about his attitude—one user said he was defensive when critiqued (e.g., calling someone a “bitch” over eyebrow remarks) Looksmaxxing Forum.

⛔ Account Status​


🧭 Summary​

Overall, AuggyDauggy comes across as a high-status, outspoken, and popular figure—someone with impressive looks and a bold online persona. He’s not without controversy: his humor occasionally borders on abrasive, and his outspoken nature can rub members the wrong way. That mix of confidence, visibility, and occasional drama makes him one of the forum’s most-discussed personalities.
 
Here’s the general consensus on AuggyDauggy from the Looksmaxxing forum:


👍 Reputation & Engagement​


🎯 Peer Perception​


🧠 Personality & Drama​

  • Sense of humor and meme-savvy: he jumps into lighthearted, playful threads, like penis-swinging challenges and joking “who’s wildin” threads Looksmaxxing ForumLooksmaxxing Forum.
  • Occasional conflict: some complained about his attitude—one user said he was defensive when critiqued (e.g., calling someone a “bitch” over eyebrow remarks) Looksmaxxing Forum.

⛔ Account Status​


🧭 Summary​

Overall, AuggyDauggy comes across as a high-status, outspoken, and popular figure—someone with impressive looks and a bold online persona. He’s not without controversy: his humor occasionally borders on abrasive, and his outspoken nature can rub members the wrong way. That mix of confidence, visibility, and occasional drama makes him one of the forum’s most-discussed personalities.
Glazing ngl
 

Analysis of Forum Consensus on "Mess" (Looksmaxxing.com)

1. Role and Recognition in the Community
Mess is a well-known and polarizing figure within the Looksmaxxing.com ecosystem. He is often referenced in discussions surrounding blackpill ideology and the psychological effects of appearance-based determinism. His presence is notable not just for his posts, but for the emotional and ideological responses he provokes among users.

2. Ideological Alignment: Blackpill Extremism
Mess is frequently identified with extreme blackpill beliefs. He posits that genetic determinism governs most social and romantic outcomes, especially for men. According to his worldview, looks are paramount and immutable to a large extent. His posts often suggest that if someone is not born with certain physical traits, their chances at dating success or social validation are fundamentally limited.

3. Community Response: Polarization and Backlash
While some users acknowledge that Mess brings a form of brutal honesty, the majority criticize his approach as overly nihilistic and self-defeating. Many users argue that his philosophy undermines the core purpose of the forum: self-improvement. His posts are often cited as examples of how blackpill thinking can spiral into hopelessness and learned helplessness.

The backlash typically centers on:

  • Lack of solutions: Mess rarely offers actionable advice.
  • Psychological harm: Users report that his content can be demoralizing or contribute to depressive thinking.
  • Contradiction with looksmaxxing ethos: His views often negate the premise that improvement is possible.
4. Cultural Symbolism: A Cautionary Figure
In many ways, Mess has become a symbolic figure on the forum—representing what happens when blackpill ideology is taken to an extreme. Threads about him often morph into broader debates about fatalism, motivation, and the limits of change. Some refer to him almost mythologically, as a "doomer archetype" within the community.

5. Minority Perspective: Selective Validation
Despite the criticism, a minority of users argue that Mess’s harsh realism acts as a necessary counterbalance to what they perceive as false optimism or cope. They believe that his ideas challenge users to confront reality, however bleak, rather than rely on false hope or delusion. Still, even among this group, there's recognition that constant exposure to his ideology can be mentally taxing.


Conclusion
Mess occupies a unique and contentious position in the Looksmaxxing.com community. He is both a voice of radical realism and a warning against ideological extremism. While his critiques of the dating market and genetic determinism resonate with some, the overwhelming consensus sees him as a net negative—more a symptom of despair than a source of empowerment.

So apparently I'm the blackpill extremist and doomer of the forum...
 
ErichSpringer is a prominent member of the Looksmaxxing forum, known for his active participation and engagement in various discussions. Here’s a summary of his presence and contributions based on multiple threads:

### Community Engagement
- **Active Contributor**: ErichSpringer is recognized for his frequent posts and interactions with other members. He often engages in discussions about looksmaxxing, a subculture focused on self-improvement and appearance enhancement.
- **Reputation**: He has garnered a reputation for being a thoughtful and sometimes polarizing figure within the community. His posts often reflect a mix of humor and serious commentary on the topics at hand.

### Interpersonal Dynamics
- **Conflict and Defense**: There have been instances where ErichSpringer has defended himself against accusations of being an alternate account for other users, indicating a level of scrutiny he faces within the forum. He often responds to critiques with a blend of sarcasm and assertiveness.
- **Reactions to Other Members**: He has commented on the dynamics between other users, particularly in relation to popular figures within the forum, such as @huntergirl. His observations often highlight the competitive and sometimes toxic nature of the community.

### Perspectives on Looksmaxxing Culture
- **Critical Insights**: ErichSpringer has shown an awareness of the broader implications of the looksmaxxing culture, including its potential to foster negative self-image among members. He engages in discussions that critique the harsh standards often perpetuated within the forum.
- **Humor and Light-heartedness**: Despite the serious nature of many discussions, he often employs humor, which helps to diffuse tension and foster a more engaging atmosphere in his interactions.

### Summary
Overall, ErichSpringer is a multifaceted member of the Looksmaxxing forum, known for his active participation, critical insights, and humorous approach to discussions. His ability to navigate conflicts and engage with various community dynamics makes him a notable figure within this online space.
 

1. Self-styled provocateur & critic​

  • In his AMA thread, Altruist dismisses the forum as “a shit fringe forum” created by “a no-name lookism user,” even claiming he got an entire country’s IP banned because the admin ignored his advice to “make it more active” Looksmaxxing Forum+13Looksmaxxing Forum+13Looksmaxxing Forum+13.
  • This reveals both arrogance and a flair for dramatics, aiming to provoke reactions rather than build community.

2. Boundary-pushing interpersonal views​

  • In a discussion titled “why is it unacceptable to touch women in public?,” Altruist defends “harmless gentle touches,” like hugging in line or playfully pinching women’s cheeks Looksmaxxing Forum.
  • His perspective was widely criticized as unsettling or inappropriate by other users.

3. Darkly humorous or bizarre side​

  • In a thread called “Describe 2025 with one pic,” someone addresses Altruist with a highly unconventional “cuckold” proposition—indicative of his reputation for edgy or provocative discussions Looksmaxxing Forum.

⚖️ Overall impression & community reception​

TraitObservations
ProvocativeLikes to stir the pot with bold claims and controversies
ArrogantTouts his influence (e.g., IP bans) and dismisses others
ControversialPushes unconventional interpersonal boundaries
Divisive receptionOthers find him unsettling, cringe, or attention-hungry

🌟 Final thoughts​


Altruist is unmistakably attention-seeking—leveraging exaggerated stories and boundary-testing positions to stand out. He seems less focused on constructive contributions and more on provoking and dominating discourse. This strategy gives him visibility, but also alienates many within the community, who describe him as either cringe-worthy or pretentious.


If you're evaluating his credibility or tone, proceed with caution. He’s a typical forum “troll-in-chief”: smart and articulate, yet unreliable and divisive—someone whose personality overshadows any substantive value.

channing-tatum-lol.gif


absolutely nailed it, tbh
 
Overall TL;DR:


ikramy began on .org seeking personal aesthetic feedback, sharing a physique profile and requesting advice. A few months later, they joined .com and became a vibrant member—posting humorously across multiple threads, mixing jokes, self-deprecation, and playful engagement with other members.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top